BabyfartsMcgeezaks said:
Then they tease an amazing scene from your favorite game and goes ''loljk it's just for pachinko'' which is kind of a slap to the face. They've shown they care more about pachinkos than the games millions of people love.
If this is the response they can expect, then I see no reason why they should do otherwise. In fact, with the way their fans have reacted in the past, it's probably an actual catalyst to leaving video games.
hermes said:
Doesn't mean we have no right to "hate them", though.
You have the right to hate anyone for any reason. You can hate Doctor Phil because the Space Ponies beat the lizard people at Quidditch. Doesn't mean it's logical, worthwhile, or not based on a false sense of entitlement.
Cowabungaa said:
So people can't care about something without being "entitled"?
Please point to where I said that. Like, I want a specific quote where I say that.
Kibeth41 said:
It's not it.
The issue is that the IPs are literally being used purely for pachinko machines.
Which shouldn't be an issue if you don't feel entitled to these games. Don't like it? Don't play the pachinko games! That's been the basic argument for everything else in the industry.
Silvanus said:
We all criticise art we like and don't like. It's a big part of why most of us are here, presumably.
I find trying to make an artistic argument here to be rather disingenuous. This isn't about the art, but about the limitations on the commerce.
erttheking said:
Doesn't make what Konami did any less of an infuriating dick move.
Didn't say it did. So what?
A friend of mine just found out she no longer has a bus route that services places she needs to go. She's upset, but she's handling it like an adult. She's contacting the powers that be, talking to them in an adult fashion, and trying to resolve this in a civil fashion. She hasn't threatened to kill the planning board or...well, so much as raised her voice to my knowledge. She's not owed anything, she wants something, and somehow, her actions seem to demonstrate that more than whatever hashtag people are floating around right now.
Then again, this is over a necessity, not a toy, and therefore she has incentive to do more than grandstanding. Maybe that's the difference.
Now, maybe you're different, but I haven't reacted to a "dick move" by my brother on anything approaching this level since I was like eight years old. I don't think you're different, though. I've seen you respond to other outrages in the same fashion I have: with embarrassment. Because this sort of conduct is embarrassing.
Hair Jordan said:
The "entitlement" you describe is a fundamental tenant of market principles.
As long as the market is gaming.
Really, you don't see this sort of behaviour on this scale outside a very specific niche of consumer products. If something were that fundamental to market principles, one would expect to see them more widely distributed. That doesn't happen. The "entitlement" I describe is histrionics and theatrics. Nobody threatens death over a washing machine or stove not being released. Well, I'm sure someone does, but it doesn't end up widespread enough to end up on the news or trending on Twitter. You don't even see this level inside similar entertainment genre enthusiast groups.