Yes and no.rockavitch said:If money was indeed owed then it's expected that it gets paid back, other than that I don't have anything else to say as I fell/fall in to the "It doesn't endear to me" group.
Investments are a risk, In a situation like this your not so much lending money but giving someone money with the hopes that if what your investing in succeeds you'll get a share of the profits and make more money than what you gave out.
Of course the problem with this is that if the product in question doesn't succeed there is no money to return to you, so you lose what you put into the project.
There are all kinds of scams run in relation to this, and a lot of legal bad blood when some investor winds up taking a bath, typically claiming that the person they gave money to lied to them or whatever. There are also issues like when someone invests in a specific project undertaken by a bigger company, the project crashes, and while the company has enough money where it could reimburse the investors it doesn't due to the terms of the contract and the fact that they were gambling on a specific project. This can get unusually nasty due to the manuvering and contract terms involved.
At any rate, the bottom line here is that Vivendi invested mony in Double Fine, but then got what it thought was a better deal and pretty much said it wanted to do a "take back" and of course Double Fine which needed the money said "no".
As far as paying back a fraction of the money, the reasn why it was doubtlessly dropped at that is that "Brutal Legend" was not a major success, and as such Vivendi's share came out to less than it invested, such are the risks.
It's corperate manuvering, and exactly the kind of thing that is ruining the gaming industry. The bottom line as it seems to me is that Vivendi invested with a company that wound up becoming the competition due to other deals, and got all butthurt about it, with Activision as Vivendi's new sugar daddy running point to try and get them their money back.