This is the inherent problem that always sits on the lap of "videogame addiction" arguments. It IS an addiction, but not in the usual chemical sense. It's a psychological addiction, which is validly recognized by NIMH. However, in the case of actual psychological addiction (as opposed to people who claim to be addicted so they won't get blamed for something), it's a result of an addictive personality. In other words, the person who is addicted gets addicted to things, it's not that the things he's addicted to are addictive. It's just like people who get addicted to a sport, or a certain food, so on and so forth. And I'm actually somewhat proud that the court system didn't even try to blame the games, they put the blame on the person who is to blame, namely the lawyer. And yes, he does need help to overcome it, but that doesn't mean the addiction wasn't his fault to begin with.Richardplex said:It's compulsion, not addiction, brain isn't being dependant on chemicals yada yada yada.
P.S. Nothing against you, Richardplex, just saw your comment and realized that line would help reinforce my post and give me something to elaborate on. I'd have used anyone else if they had said the same thing too. Sorry if it comes off as me attacking you, that isn't my intention.