I've got to agree - some people are just trash-spewing jerks, but trash-spewing isn't a threat, and if you start construing it as a threat, then everyone's got to watch what they say, not just in terms of vitriol, but sarcasm, black humour, jokes in intentional bad taste, and jokes in unintentional bad taste. Not everyone is good at understanding how what they'll say will be interpreted, sometimes people slip up, and for the consequences to even POSSIBLY include something like this - 8 years of jail time and probably going on some watchlists - is nuts.Andy Chalk said:I'm honestly surprised at people who seem perfectly comfortable with the idea that we now live in a "be careful what you say" society. This kid - and he is a kid - spends three months in jail and faces a longer sentence than some killers simply because we are too afraid to make a call between a genuine threat and shit-talk on the internet, and this is somehow okay?
*eye roll* Cannot believe I missed that - shows how long it's been since I've been either age, really. It was a last minute swap-out for being able to buy porn. And smoking? Are cigarettes 18+?Irridium said:Small correction, you can't buy booze in the US if you're 18. You have to wait 'till 21 for that. You can totally drive a machine that can easily kill, cast your vote on politics and government, get married, have sex, go to actual jail, and every other fun thing adults get to do. But drinking? Now that's just crazy!
I don't think "being nice to people" is something you can legislate in a free society.mythgraven said:... And yet, I see no mention of legislation aimed at stopping people from acting like -raging, incoherent, psychotic, belligerent ASSHOLES- to one another online.
Was this supposed to be ironic? It's hard to tell sometimes.mythgraven said:Youve been warned, Internet. Youve been being warned with increasing severity over the last few years.
Can't spend a dozen years controlling your populace through fear of terrorism and other things without shit like this occurring.Andy Chalk said:I'm honestly surprised at people who seem perfectly comfortable with the idea that we now live in a "be careful what you say" society. This kid - and he is a kid - spends three months in jail and faces a longer sentence than some killers simply because we are too afraid to make a call between a genuine threat and shit-talk on the internet, and this is somehow okay?
What? So social media is all business now?social media is not a playground
Cases take a long time to go through the legal system. Most Criminal trial defendants end up being in jail for months maybe even over a year before their case eventually gets a verdict. Since he is eighteen, he goes through the same hoops as everyone else and is not a kid like his father keeps insisting. I'm pretty sure his case will eventually be dismissed, and even if it doesn't, the state does not have much evidence. Just let the court system sort it out.Bobic said:Oh yeah, he's only been in jail for three months, I see nothing to be concerned about.NvrPhazed said:FranckN said:what happen to that of "you are innocent until proven guilty"?
civil rights are a joke, it seems.
ummm no one said he was convicted just arrested and charged, but thanks for playing.
I'm with you 100% on this, Andy.Andy Chalk said:I'm honestly surprised at people who seem perfectly comfortable with the idea that we now live in a "be careful what you say" society. This kid - and he is a kid - spends three months in jail and faces a longer sentence than some killers simply because we are too afraid to make a call between a genuine threat and shit-talk on the internet, and this is somehow okay?
I agree with this. It is getting pretty out of hand. Everyone is a terrorist now. Be nice or go to jail.Andy Chalk said:I'm honestly surprised at people who seem perfectly comfortable with the idea that we now live in a "be careful what you say" society. This kid - and he is a kid - spends three months in jail and faces a longer sentence than some killers simply because we are too afraid to make a call between a genuine threat and shit-talk on the internet, and this is somehow okay?
Simple, page views. LoL is popular. If this was just an article about reckless speech, nobody would care. I mean, The Escapist does this a lot. Like all the time. Like the article about the PS4 requiring PS+ for online play.ElFuzzy said:I'm confused with the inclusion of League of Legends in this article. From what I gather, he was using Facebook whilst playing a league match? I'm not going to get into how much that bother's me in the first place, but instead it seems to be irrelevant. I don't recognize the name of the player, and they don't mention any affiliation he might have, so it seems that he's just happens to play. Also, if an opponent messages you on Facebook, wouldn't they have to actually know you on Facebook? If the actual conversation was shown, instead of an except, maybe I wouldn't be so confused.