Left 4 Dead 2 and WoW graphics

Recommended Videos

kwagamon

New member
Jun 24, 2010
289
0
0
So I just had an argument with my friend over which has more advanced graphics, Left 4 Dead or World of Warcraft. I say Left 4 Dead 2 but he disagrees. So Escapists, will you help me settle this one?
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
16,478
5,078
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
your friend is an idiot, really arguing the advanced ness of either games graphics is stupid since they are so unrelated but I suppose in terms of processing power needed to run both games, l4d needs more to do what it does
 

Terminate421

New member
Jul 21, 2010
5,771
0
0
World of warcraft is better at activity going on involving players

Left 4 Dead 2's detail takes the cake in graphics though. Plus its better as a game.
 

TerranReaper

New member
Mar 28, 2009
953
0
0
The graphics on WoW does keep improving but it's simply just too outdated to compare to L4D2, a newer game. Not exactly a fair comparison here...
 

VincentX3

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,299
0
0
ciortas1 said:
Worgen said:
On that you're wrong thoough. WoW needs, literally, a beast of a computer to run at its fullest. I suspect it's gonna be even harsher in Cataclysm.

Also, just because WoW needs a beast of a computer doesn't mean it's graphics are more advanced, Since the discussion isn't about potentiality, but the graphic advancement.
 

kwagamon

New member
Jun 24, 2010
289
0
0
Terminate421 said:
World of warcraft is better at activity going on involving players

Left 4 Dead 2's detail takes the cake in graphics though. Plus its better as a game.
Roughly what I said, but he just won't listen.

Novskij said:
L4D2 has a very boring style to its graphics, its very plain and bland.

WoW is colourful and stylized, so i think your friend is right.

WoW graphics have better design than Left For Dead 2.
Not talkin' about which one has a more interesting style, because personally I'd say that's a tie simply due to the vast difference in style making it impossible to compare.

By the way, I actually showed him this and in his response in his exact words: "They're all high."
 

The Lunatic

Princess
Jun 3, 2010
2,291
0
0
Uh..

Seriously?

Anyone with eyes can see how much more advanced and better looking L4D's graphics are compared to something like WoW.

Blind fanboyism is the only thing which would say otherwise.

Simply ignore it.
 

strum4h

New member
Jan 3, 2009
644
0
0
They are trying to completely revamp everything in cataclysm. So I would have to go with l4d now and when cata comes out WoW.
 

kwagamon

New member
Jun 24, 2010
289
0
0
strum4h said:
They are trying to completely revamp everything in cataclysm. So I would have to go with l4d now and when cata comes out WoW.
Just because they're revamping doesn't mean that it'll be better. I'd hold off on that call until it actually comes out.
 

HellsingerAngel

New member
Jul 6, 2008
602
0
0
WoW has to render ten of thousands of people and keep track of them even if they aren'ton your screen because they're somewhere in the completely open and almost load free world. L4D2 is within small lobbies of people that things can be rendered at certain stages, so not everything has to be kept track of at once within a level.

Because of these limitations and the release dates on both L4D2 and WotLK, 4D2 has the better graphics, simply because they have more memory to render better models as the processing power doesn't need to go into other areas.
 

VanityGirl

New member
Apr 29, 2009
3,471
0
0
ciortas1 said:
Worgen said:
On that you're wrong though. WoW needs, literally, a beast of a computer to run at its fullest. I suspect it's gonna be even harsher in Cataclysm.
*looks at her 5 year old laptop*
My laptop runs it just fine. It's not really a beast, I just do regular mantainance on it and try keeping it bug free.
 

Jasper Jeffs

New member
Nov 22, 2009
1,454
0
0
World of Warcraft has a better and more impressive art style, but Left 4 Dead 2 has pretty exploding body parts.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
16,478
5,078
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
ciortas1 said:
Worgen said:
On that you're wrong though. WoW needs, literally, a beast of a computer to run at its fullest. I suspect it's gonna be even harsher in Cataclysm.
all that means is that the wow engine is becoming less and less optimized for use, its easy to have a rather ugly and low poly game run like shit even on a really powerful comp, if its not optimized right, really if wow gets slow its probably because the devs are either pushing the engine to do things its not meant to (I remember the slowdowns during the sprinkler things in.... blackwings lair?) or its a badly coded game
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,746
6
43
Country
USA
Why is this even a discussion? I've been hearing for years how "great" WoW's graphics are, but it's only because of their stylized, cartoon graphics that it looks cool at all. Hell, I had WoW-tards telling me that Guild Wars looked like crap when it came out, and yet at the time WoW looked like Warcraft 3 with the blocky, low-detail models. I believe I even spotted one character that literally had 2 polygons for its face, and only its textures made it look presentable.
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
poiumty said:
Considering WoW uses a decade-old engine, it'll be safe to say that comparison with any current gen game is just unfair.
Left 4 Dead 2 still runs on the Steam Engine doesn't it? Last I checked, the Steam Engine has been tweaked over the course of time, but overall it is still a decade old engine.

As for Graphics, my vote goes to World of Warcraft. Just look at the Outlands or Northrend worlds, they look gorgeous.
 

microhive

New member
Mar 27, 2009
489
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
poiumty said:
Considering WoW uses a decade-old engine, it'll be safe to say that comparison with any current gen game is just unfair.
Left 4 Dead 2 still runs on the Steam Engine doesn't it? Last I checked, the Steam Engine has been tweaked over the course of time, but overall it is still a decade old engine.

As for Graphics, my vote goes to World of Warcraft. Just look at the Outlands or Northrend worlds, they look gorgeous.
Just want to say that the source engine is a continually evolving engine that gets optimized all the time and incorporates all sorts of nice modern advancements.WoW however can't due to the engine's limitations and the number of hardware they have to support.