The infamous SCAMola said:
I don't know what the exact quote is, but going by oliveira's comment, I would say that no, there's norhing ironic. Saying that L4D2 is just L4D with better graphics is kinda stupid to me.
To clarify what Yatzhee says is:
"Imagine if Valve released Half Life and then a couple of years later release Half Life with the same story but with better graphics.Everyone would go nuts and"...something about sending Gabe into a a mental institute.
The thing is that L4D2 is not the same game as L4D.
L4D2 is just not a reskin of L4D(till the game gets released I'll stand by these facts.) You got major overhaul to the games gameplay, new weapons with special type of bullets and mechanics, common uncommon Infected, Melee weapons, new special Infected, new mechanics to the existing special infected, more campaigns, versus, Survivor and I think they also mentioned a new game mode(Not sure about that), improved and more evil AI Director and most likely a new Source Engine update.
Its just alot of stuff to make to put out as free DLC. If Valve would make that DLC payable there would be even more boycott groups.
The better option would be an expansion, but what if the new mechanics ruin the already existing client?
Anyway when the game gets released, we are finally going to see if L4D2 is worth the full price or it should have just been an expansion pack.