Left 4 Dead 2

Recommended Videos

Giovanto

New member
Jun 3, 2008
203
0
0
Please tell me I am not the only one wishing they were NOT making a sequel already? It just looks so much more generic and seems to forget what made L4D so great. The characters are not hard to distinguish, the Tank looked...ehhh...cartoony? Just seems like it will murder the franchise. Oh yeah, did I mention its extremely rushed?
 

AkJay

New member
Feb 22, 2009
3,555
0
0
I'm sorry sir, but.. rushed? Valve does not rush games, they will announce it this early, sure, but they will deliver about 3-4 years down the road, and as for cartoony, they just wanted to announce something for the upcoming E3, and it was made with the source engine.
 

DrunkenKitty

New member
Nov 20, 2008
283
0
0
It's useful if topics like this have links posted, rather than asking people to google it themselves and reply having likely looked at a different page than you did.
 

Rand-m

New member
Feb 8, 2009
482
0
0
I agree, I almost wish they'd wait longer. AND BRING BACK THE OLD CHARACTERS!

Can anyone say... Cameo?
 

DrunkenKitty

New member
Nov 20, 2008
283
0
0
AkJay said:
I'm sorry sir, but.. rushed? Valve does not rush games, they will announce it this early, sure, but they will deliver about 3-4 years down the road, and as for cartoony, they just wanted to announce something for the upcoming E3, and it was made with the source engine.
They announced a release already: November 17th, 2009.
 

YuheJi

New member
Mar 17, 2009
927
0
0
DrunkenKitty said:
AkJay said:
I'm sorry sir, but.. rushed? Valve does not rush games, they will announce it this early, sure, but they will deliver about 3-4 years down the road, and as for cartoony, they just wanted to announce something for the upcoming E3, and it was made with the source engine.
They announced a release already: November 17th, 2009.
But you do remember what happened the first time they announced the HL2 release date, right?
 

knightguy123

New member
May 20, 2009
171
0
0
Giovanto said:
Please tell me I am not the only one wishing they were NOT making a sequel already? It just looks so much more generic and seems to forget what made L4D so great. The characters are not hard to distinguish, the Tank looked...ehhh...cartoony? Just seems like it will murder the franchise. Oh yeah, did I mention its extremely rushed?
it not not left 4 dead 2 its left dead 42
 

AkJay

New member
Feb 22, 2009
3,555
0
0
DrunkenKitty said:
AkJay said:
I'm sorry sir, but.. rushed? Valve does not rush games, they will announce it this early, sure, but they will deliver about 3-4 years down the road, and as for cartoony, they just wanted to announce something for the upcoming E3, and it was made with the source engine.
They announced a release already: November 17th, 2009.
Just because they announced it does not mean it will be set into stone.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,976
0
0
I was kind of hoping they would add a new campaign or two to the existing one first... :(
I really don't want to pay another 50 bucks for 5 more levels running on the exact same engine.
 

Ripshot

New member
Aug 5, 2008
224
0
0
well I kind of like Zombies in Louisiana (I assume it's there, seems like it)

and this is Valve, they're probably going to push it back
and then again, they can work incredibly quickly when they get into gear
 

Outcast107

New member
Mar 20, 2009
1,965
0
0
It look good imo. I'm not sure what the OP saying the Tank look cartoony. It look like a hill billy version of the tank. Just fatter. But It seem you also get melee weapons, like chainsaws and a frying pan.
 

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
First of all, I'm going to say that I was pretty pissed when I first heard about this. However, do a bit of research before you start shouting it down.

Theres an interesting artical and a podcast about on Rock Paper Shotgun.

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/

And here are some footage of the game on IGN

http://uk.pc.ign.com/dor/objects/14352245/left-4-dead-2/videos/l4d2_gmp_dockstart_052809.html;jsessionid=2lsaqjlwkmdtq


It does basically feel like a great big HUGE bit of DLC, but it's big enough that I can understand a completely new game (I'm not that happy about it but still). It's basically Left 4 Dead, and then some.

That means all the original boss infected (Smoker, Tank, Witch ect) plus new ones, of which two have been announced. One is a kind of mix of the tank and a normal infected, like it's take sterioids but it's only worked down one side. It basically pushes with his huge heman arm (sounds like how a big daddy does) or grabs you and keeps smacking you to the ground until someone rescues you. Theres a wondering witch (only appears in new day light levels) who instead of crying sings an eary song and actually moves around, creeping up on survivors and so on, meaning its a lot harder to avoid her.

There seems to be a little more enthesis on story this time. Not hugely but each campaign leads into each other for instance, and the new survivors have more back story and develope as they move though the campaigns

The maps also sound a lot more open too, theres lots of different directions and secret paths to take, some of which I think the Director may force you to take (puts a vehical in your way or something)

Theres also weird minor stuff like zombies that wear hazard suits (these ones won't be effected by fire) and bullets that set your enemies alight.

Theres also ofcoarse melee weapons, which include a bassball bat, a frypan (What?) a chainsaw and an axe, plus more to come. I think you may have less bullets meaning that melee weapons become essential.

This is still really, really weird, like weirder than by dad turning out to be a goldfish. But still...congratulations ValvE! It took you less than a decade to make a game. That quite an achievement.
 

Da_Schwartz

New member
Jul 15, 2008
1,847
0
0
All they needed to do is add more enemies, guns, and maps to the original.. How hard can this be?
Maybe a customizable character look or two.
 

Nanissimov

New member
Feb 17, 2009
571
0
0
Join the club, its not that i dont like left for dead, this is the same portal debate, first one was great but you dont want the second one becuase you know its ganna be a MONSTOROUS TURD! The olny thing is i hope valve to the least makes it good, good new charectars,hot college chick and guy with big tounge (you know what im talkin bout :)) and just make it fun.
 

thatstheguy

New member
Dec 27, 2008
1,158
0
0
I really hoped they would of called it "Left 5 Dead". I guess you can't get everything you want. Still, not like Valve to release a sequel to a game in such a short time. I sense a disturbance in the horizon.
 

Giovanto

New member
Jun 3, 2008
203
0
0
Nanissimov said:
It should be called "Left 2 die" :) it would be so much better!
Funny thing is...THIS IS WHAT I THOUGHT! When it first came out I thought "The sequel should be called Left 2 Die."

And on topic...that is true. Its probably E3 eye candy.
 

elricik

New member
Nov 1, 2008
3,080
0
0
Why so early? I know it won't be released in November, but I was kinda hoping for some new maps via DLC for the first game before the 2nd came out. Plus lets talk about the title. "Left for Dead 2" Why? Couldn't they have done anything better?