Let's have a GENDER WAR!

Recommended Videos

Carbonyl

New member
Jun 2, 2011
451
0
0
Oh come now, you don't have to kill off the other gender!


You just need to sedate them.
 

Carbonyl

New member
Jun 2, 2011
451
0
0
Naeras said:
Why is Cosmopolitan encouraging their (female) audience to poison, steal from, physically hurt and emotionally harass partners they for some reason suspect might be hiding something from them? [http://www.cracked.com/article_19066_7-psychotic-pieces-relationship-advice-from-cosmo.html]

WHY CANT MEN DO THIS AS WELL
FUCK THE FEMINISTS
RAGE

Cosmo, and all other "women's" magazines do a disservice to all genders, and it's not feminists who preach that. The magazine writers are just fucked-up people, and much of the populace is insecure and thus, gullible.
 

Naeras

New member
Mar 1, 2011
989
0
0
Carbonyl said:
Cosmo, and all other "women's" magazines do a disservice to all genders, and it's not feminists who preach that. The magazine writers are just fucked-up people, and much of the populace is insecure and thus, gullible.
Scroll two posts up from the one I'm quoting now. ^^
 

YouCallMeNighthawk

New member
Mar 8, 2010
722
0
0
all we need to do is take hostage a few women take their egg and then fertilize them and genetically enhance some super men to do our bidding :)
 

Jewrean

New member
Jun 27, 2010
1,101
0
0

A game from the 90's called Gender Wars. Play as Male or Female. Run missions such as destroying weapons caches, raiding for prisoners for artificial insemination, or just go on a killing spree in a tank.

What's hilarious though is that this video points out one of the games biggest flaws. Traversing it's elevators.
 

Carbonyl

New member
Jun 2, 2011
451
0
0
Naeras said:
Carbonyl said:
Cosmo, and all other "women's" magazines do a disservice to all genders, and it's not feminists who preach that. The magazine writers are just fucked-up people, and much of the populace is insecure and thus, gullible.
Scroll two posts up from the one I'm quoting now. ^^
Thank you for reminding me to stop being serious! Oi, me, that was a close one.

I'll get back to work on my bra-based siege weapon designs.




Honestly though, I really take issue with women's magazines, they make me angry.
 

II Scarecrow II

New member
Feb 23, 2011
106
0
0
ChupathingyX said:
DigitalSushi said:
sERIOUSLY, i DON'T KNOW A SINGLE GUY THAT CAN DO A BARBECUE WITHOUT POISONING EVERYONE.
I know heaps of guys who can make an awesome barbecue.

Then again, I do live in Australia.
QFFT MATE!! I don't know any guy that can FAIL a barbecue, my 14 year old brother included. Aussies just have a knack for being awesome :)
 

SlaveNumber23

A WordlessThing, a ThinglessWord
Aug 9, 2011
1,203
0
0
Reminds me of the book 'The knife of never letting go', awesome book. Anyway back on topic, men will win easily, all that firearms training from playing all those shooters will pay off. The Starcraft players can command the army of men.
 

Zorg Machine

New member
Jul 28, 2008
1,303
0
0
DigitalSushi said:
Esotera said:
I think males would probably win if it came to outright war, as on average we are stronger & more likely to be into sports than women, also we'd have most members of the military. If it came to a cold war though, I've no doubt women would win by espionage.
We need women to make more men though, also the male genetic code is starting to break, you know the Y chromosome is smaller and has less genetic detail I think.
As it turns out, that is bullshit. While the x chromosome is bigger than it originally was and the y chromosome is smaller than it originally was, they haven't changed for thousands of years. It was a one time mutation way back.

OT: While women would have the upper hand in espionage (more persuasiveness and stuff) it would still be pretty damn easy to identify them and arrest them so I don't think that would work very well. Men would win due to the large weapon advantage that we have but if the women defended themselves for long enough we would all die out anyway.

So really, it's a dare battle. Who can hold out long enough without caving to save our race...so it will probably end with a mutually beneficial agreement slightly favoring the women in a way that us men don't notice until it's too late.
 

Naeras

New member
Mar 1, 2011
989
0
0
Carbonyl said:
Thank you for reminding me to stop being serious! Oi, me, that was a close one.

I'll get back to work on my bra-based siege weapon designs.




Honestly though, I really take issue with women's magazines, they make me angry.
Thank you, now my computer screen and keyboard is full of coffee due to laughing.

Also women's magazines are stupid, and thankfully most women I know tend to agree on that. My girlfriend wondered how the writers of this shit hadn't been put in an asylum already, before (jokingly) claiming I was cheating because I was sitting weird.

I should also go back to working on my dumbbells with integrated hand grenades and boxing gloves, while I'm at it.
 

Crazycat690

New member
Aug 31, 2009
677
0
0
Women would obviously win because any real gentlemen would not only not attack women, they would defend them, and since there are more women in the world and even kids can use guns all I can say is...

...I for one would welcome our new female overlords.
 

Biosophilogical

New member
Jul 8, 2009
3,264
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
We can pee standing up.


You can't begin to comprehend just how jealous women are of that amazing ability.
I'm just going to put this out there, but gay guys would become our greatest resource. When the gender-pooh hits the proverbial ceiling fan, there is going to be a hetero-crippling lack of boobs. So guys would need to heavily rely upon the combat prowess of gay men, or surrender within a week to the booby-powers of the enemy.

OT: I think that there are two possibilities on the guy side. Either we'd become so lost in mob mentality that our competitive streak will boil over into all out war, which would probably result in prison-homosexuality (without females, there would be no real alternatives except other men, so while it wouldn't be true homosexuality, there'd still be a dramatic rise in man-on-man sexy-times[footnote]Meaning no, we would not realise that we were destroying the other half of the reproductive cycle, meaning yes, humanity would be doooooooomed[/footnote]), OR we'd mostly lose our motivation as the majority punctuates their every attempt at self-motivation with "But boobs"[footnote]For example; "We should burn their farms, blow up their factories and wipe them from this earth ... but boobs ..."[/footnote].

I'm not too sure about the girl side, you'd have to get a female to create an over-exaggerated depiction of the female mentality.
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,886
0
0
Biosophilogical said:
Daystar Clarion said:
We can pee standing up.


You can't begin to comprehend just how jealous women are of that amazing ability.
I'm just going to put this out there, but gay guys would become our greatest resource. When the gender-pooh hits the proverbial ceiling fan, there is going to be a hetero-crippling lack of boobs. So guys would need to heavily rely upon the combat prowess of gay men, or surrender within a week to the booby-powers of the enemy.
Don't worry, we have many hidden stockpiles of porn around, we'll make it through this.
 

Carbonyl

New member
Jun 2, 2011
451
0
0
Naeras said:
Carbonyl said:
Thank you for reminding me to stop being serious! Oi, me, that was a close one.

I'll get back to work on my bra-based siege weapon designs.




Honestly though, I really take issue with women's magazines, they make me angry.
Thank you, now my computer screen and keyboard is full of coffee due to laughing.

Also women's magazines are stupid, and thankfully most women I know tend to agree on that. My girlfriend wondered how the writers of this shit hadn't been put in an asylum already, before (jokingly) claiming I was cheating because I was sitting weird.

I should also go back to working on my dumbbells with integrated hand grenades and boxing gloves, while I'm at it.

YOU WERE SITTING WEIRD? You are obviously not only cheating, but have devoured all of the many bastard children you have sired! That's what it says in my lady-dictionary, at the very least.


Now, back to the tampon bazooka prototype!
 

TheEvilGenius

New member
Apr 18, 2010
50
0
0
Well, I think men would win the the first battles, but women would win in the long run. You see, all of the men would become tremendous ass holes and therefore, the women would fall madly in love with us and thus become involved with us. Then, after the relationship is established, they would call upon the power of estrogen and clever use of what I call "Vaginal Ransom" to mind-game us into submission.

Wait... that's already happening!

 

Naeras

New member
Mar 1, 2011
989
0
0
Carbonyl said:
YOU WERE SITTING WEIRD? You are obviously not only cheating, but have devoured all of the many bastard children you have sired! That's what it says in my lady-dictionary, at the very least.


Now, back to the tampon bazooka prototype!
I didn't devour all of them. I merely sacrificed a few. Five or six, I can't remember. Most of them are still alive, they're hanging upside down in the closet.
proy3 said:
Well, I think men would win the the first battles, but women would win in the long run. You see, all of the men would become tremendous ass holes and therefore, the women would fall madly in love with us and thus become involved with us. Then, after the relationship is established, they would call upon the power of estrogen and clever use of what I call "Vaginal Ransom" to mind-game us into submission.

Wait... that's already happening!

http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/004/077/Raisins_Face.jpg
Do your homework beforehand and make sure you become so good in bed the woman can't play the vaginal ransom card. If they'll lose more orgasms than you will on average, that plan will fail.
Other reasons that plan will fail is that as soon as everyone's an asshole, there won't be relationships. They'll just seduce the women, sleep with them once or twice and dump them while hurting their feelings and making them cut/suicide/eat so much ice cream they become fat and die of heart diseases. Either way, they lose. :V
(also women don't actually like assholes :V)
 

Marcus Kehoe

New member
Mar 18, 2011
757
0
0
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
If it was a real war it would be many year's.

In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.

But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
Have you ever heard of cyanide tablets? And remote control bombs? And castration?
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
 

Durgiun

New member
Dec 25, 2008
842
0
0
Marcus Kehoe said:
Durgiun said:
Marcus Kehoe said:
If it was a real war it would be many year's.

In fighting men would ultimately win because they are naturally stronger and while woman with training may be an even fight an un-experienced man has advantage over an un-experienced woman on average.

But if it comes to a war that requires replenishment woman win, they only need a few men to impregnate many woman. So if 3 guys get captured that could be potentially hundreds of babies while with men if 3 woman get captured you got 3 babies.
Have you ever heard of cyanide tablets? And remote control bombs? And castration?
When you get to that stuff the gender line begin's to disappear. It doesn't matter who, anyone can push a button or shoot a gun, when it comes to that point it is a game of numbers.
And women would have more of them. As I remember, I heard something about some people creating sperm out of bone marrow from a male and a female. So women would have tha advantage. But the superior numbers would bolster the ego and the the men would have to fight guerilla style.
 

D Moness

Left the building
Sep 16, 2010
1,146
0
0
Dan Steele said:
This is going to turn into "macross do you remember love" isn't it?
At least we aren't bred for war like the Zentradi and the Meltrandi.
 

GryffinDarkBreed

New member
Jul 21, 2008
99
0
0
Call me when women are deployed to frontline combat, made to enlist in the draft, and are charged almost twice as much for car insurance, and aren't favored in child custody hearings.

Until then, men aren't on equal social standing to women.