Isn't that essentially what they were trying for again with the Wii-U with the gamepad and trying to capitilize on the 'Wii' brand, only to find out that market had shifted its focus to phones and tablets? The Wii already burned itself out rather quickly. It was a great money maker for Nintendo while it lasted, but it dried up within a few years.wombat_of_war said:going casual
I don't think they're going to be abandoning the Wii U anytime soon but I'd say it's fairly likely that they've started development on its successor, or will be soon. The PS4 started development back in 2008, these things take time.Brian Tams said:1. You cannot abandon the Wii U and begin developing another console
Miyamoto would have nothing to do with it - a hostile takeover is simply a legal maneuver that any public company is subject to.the hidden eagle said:Hostile takeover?Lmao,you're joking right?Miyamoto would fight to the death for his top two money makers to stay with Nintendo.But thanks for giving me a laugh because saying that Nintendo could be vulnerable to a hostile takeover is lulz worthy.
that really is Nintendo's biggest problem I think with the damn thing. They dropped the ball on the marketing department. I don't know what happened but I find it odd that them and Disney for that matter have shitty marketing departments. I mean they have unlimited money and yet no one knows what the Wii U is and in Disney's case they sold a crappy version of Frozen which is one of the best movies they have ever made. I saw a shit ton of advertisements for the Wii. They knew exactly what to sell, who they wanted to sell it to, etc. I see next to no Wii U advertisements. If they advertised it better and more then I think it would do fine. In my honest opinion though 2014 is going to be the year that either makes or breaks it. A lot of big guns are being released for it this year and if that doesn't push consoles then its done.Johnny Novgorod said:I always figured the Wii U suffered due to lack of marketing/exposure. To this very day I'm not exactly sure what it is, how it looks like and what games you can play in it. So lower the price and market that fucker.
Honestly the tablet is the key to console RTS games. I actually spent a day and mapped out the controls for League of Legends to a console and the only one that would work was the Wii U with its tablet. Nintendo has the tools to finally bring real good RTS gameplay to consoles. Not saying it would ever over shadow PCs but Nintendo does have a market they could corner if anyone ever figured it out.GonzoGamer said:I think it really is all about the games. It's a decent console and I would get it if it had games I want.
As grand pu bah president of Nintendo I would first contact Bethesda & Obsidian and have them make a Fallout game that's exclusive to the WiiU & a prequel to it on the 3ds. I would of course get our own guys to do the testing on it. That tablet thing would make an awesome pipboy.
Let's also make the next Dawn of War a WiiU exclusive. Once again that tablet would go well with an RTS.
Then I would get whoever holds the rights to D&D video games to make one for the WiiU; a game where you get together with your friends to play D&D again. The DM holds the tablet and guides (and to a certain extent creates) the adventure.
Their strength right now is local multiplayer and the tablet could be great too if they did clever stuff with it.
Yes to all of these, especially the figures, sword and shield replicas, and the real Nintendo Land. I wish Nintendo did more merchandising with their properties in general. Pokemon gets tons of merchandise of all kinds, but most Nintendo franchises are ignored in this regard.Big_Willie_Styles said:1) Design a bunch of new Pokemon (always wanted to do that.)
2) Put in some ideas for the next Zelda game.
3) The stuff I didn't know that was mentioned by others above.
4) Greenlight Nintendo action figures that will be sold in the U.S. market (because they damn never are, just Japan) and get myself three of each one.
5) Commission a true-to-scale Master Sword and OoT Mirror Shield and make two of 'em because why not?
6) Greenlight one of my video game ideas.
7) Announce the creation of a Nintendo Land amusement park in America (and probably Japan, somewhere.)
8) Meet with a bunch of people to greenlight new Nintendo-branded IPs.
9) Add Ganondorf with his sword to the next Super Smash Bros., reinstate Roy and Mewtwo and Dr. Mario, add Blaziken (Mega Evolution is his Final Smash,) add Wolf Link & Midna, add the Chimera from Earthbound, add Ridley, add the Mii, add Professor Layton, add a character from Wonderful 101, add Little Mac, add Tingle, etc.
Disney does know how to market though. It doesn't portray the movie for what it really is, but it gets butts in the seat. In the West cartoons are for kids, so the way to market that is by making it look all goofy. If you market its dramatic elements, parents aren't going to take their kids to see it. Because who wants the watch a serious cartoon, am I right?KazeAizen said:I don't know what happened but I find it odd that them and Disney for that matter have shitty marketing departments. I mean they have unlimited money and yet no one knows what the Wii U is and in Disney's case they sold a crappy version of Frozen which is one of the best movies they have ever made.
I would agree with you if it was anyone else but Disney. The consensus it seems for the marketing for that movie was that it sucked until they released the third trailer for it. Which nails what they should've been selling, and if parents aren't going to take their kids to a Disney animated movie then they are parenting wrong. It was only after the release of the movie that I saw better commercials and the word spread via word of mouth that "No its not what's in the trailers at all. Its so much better." Disney is known for having touching and dramatic moments along side the fun ones in their movies. Playing up action and comedy was just not a smart way to go.Casual Shinji said:Disney does know how to market though. It doesn't portray the movie for what it really is, but it gets butts in the seat. In the West cartoons are for kids, so the way to market that is by making it look all goofy. If you market its dramatic elements, parents aren't going to take their kids to see it. Because who wants the watch a serious cartoon, am I right?KazeAizen said:I don't know what happened but I find it odd that them and Disney for that matter have shitty marketing departments. I mean they have unlimited money and yet no one knows what the Wii U is and in Disney's case they sold a crappy version of Frozen which is one of the best movies they have ever made.