Because clearly none of those problems ever existed before M rated videogames.furnatic said:And parents wonder why kids are having sex and shooting each other at such an early age.
Game ratings aren't managed by the Federal government, instead by an independent body, the ESRB. Therefor it technically is not illegal to supply a minor with a mature game. It is however illegal for a retailer to sell a mature game directly to a minor.afaceforradio said:It's a federal offense to supply an underage person with an age-rated item, she shouldn't have been sold the item by law!VanityGirl said:Nothing bothers me more when I see a parent go into gamestop, pick up a title like Manhunt and say "Oh yeah, my 8 year old would like this".
It gives me a sense of slight disdain as I see an obvious nongamer pick up a game for their gamer kid without any knowledge on the content of the game.
My buddy who works at Gamestop told me that he had a woman come in and grab a copy of GTAIV. The guy, being a good employee, asked if she'd ever played a GTA before.
The lady responded, "Oh this isn't for me, it's for my 7 year old son". The man aked her if she knew anything about Grand Theft auto. The woman responded with a simple "No".
After explaining that you can buy hookers, drugs, beat people to death, shoot police, and all the other things you can do, the woman (who wasn't listening) just said OK and still bought the game.
Before I get the "Well if they're mature enough argument" let's step back and think.
DO you remember how you acted a 5-10? Most likely you weren't the cream of the crop maturity wise. I sure wasn't. I climbed trees and played Scoooby Doo and Boogerman on my Genesis!
I don't mind when parents let their kids play games, but I do mind that they aren't taking a more active role in watching what their kids play.
These are the same people who look back 20 years later and say "Why is my kid so fucked up?"
What is your opinion on the matter?
I hate it myself. Same with films. Age ratings are there for a reason.
Myrddin Emrys said:I don't have a problem with letting kids play the game so long as they know and recognize that it isn't real and in no way meant to happen. If I had a child and they did something wrong and it was in any way related to a game they played, I'd take the game from them. I likely wouldn't be giving my seven year old child GTA though, but I wouldn't keep all M rated games away.
However, I don't support a parent ignorantly buying a game for a kid. I worked at a GameStop for a short period of time and had a similar situation occur and by law I had explained the same situation to the mother and she simply nodded and bought the game. She came back a few days later ranting and raving about how she couldn't believe I sold her the game.
So in all reality, it really depends on both the child and the parent. If the child can't accept that it isn't real then they shouldn't have it. If the parent is too ignorant to pay attention to what they are giving their kids-- they probably won't notice if their kid is messed up or realize why.
I just meant i think its wrong and sad that a parent wouldn't even take the time to read the label or know what the game is about before they expose their children to it. It exposes them to world they don't really understand and shouldn't experience until they're older. It'd be like letting a five year old watch Pulp Fiction.Penguinness said:How do you find it extremely wrong if you don't know?Mezmer said:I find it extremely wrong. I had good parents, every time I asked for a rated M game as a kid, they just gave me a look that said "No way in hell". I can't imagine letting a kid playing GTA. They don't need it. I played Pokemon and Jak and Daxter as a kid, kept me entertained for embarrassingly large amounts of time. I think I played my first M game when I was...12 or 13? But it was Oblivion, which was supposed to be rated T so I guess that barely counts.