Library of Congress to Archive Tweets

Kiithid

New member
Aug 12, 2009
151
0
0
Armored Prayer said:
Cpt_Oblivious said:
Armored Prayer said:
*Slowly tilts head* Really?

I mean I can understand for some of the more important tweets, but even the non important ones?
Yea, everyday people have given us so much information about history, like Samuel Pepys' diaries a few hundred years ago. And random graffiti on various buildings as well.
I guess that true, but the historians will have to dig through a lot of crap to find the gems.
They are the archeologists of the future. Who said Indiana was dead, he just went to the webz.
 

Lvl 64 Klutz

Crowsplosion!
Apr 8, 2008
2,338
0
0
Jedoro said:
What's next, Facebook statuses? People in the future are going to think we were all retarded.
"Now, if you'll all open your Theology textbooks to the chapter on Bieberism..."
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Cpt_Oblivious said:
Armored Prayer said:
*Slowly tilts head* Really?

I mean I can understand for some of the more important tweets, but even the non important ones?
Yea, everyday people have given us so much information about history, like Samuel Pepys' diaries a few hundred years ago. And random graffiti on various buildings as well.
Well, it's funny you should say that... http://twitter.com/samuelpepys
 

Cpt_Oblivious

Not Dead Yet
Jan 7, 2009
6,933
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Cpt_Oblivious said:
Armored Prayer said:
*Slowly tilts head* Really?

I mean I can understand for some of the more important tweets, but even the non important ones?
Yea, everyday people have given us so much information about history, like Samuel Pepys' diaries a few hundred years ago. And random graffiti on various buildings as well.
Well, it's funny you should say that... http://twitter.com/samuelpepys
Mind thoroughly blown. Thank you Root.

Also, why did you get rid of the Time Lord title?
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
You naysayers do know that the Library of Congress does this all the time, right, with blogs and stuff?

-- Alex
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Yeah, because how epic your burrito was is so damn important to US history!! /sarcasm

but in all seriousness, It would make much more sense if they only recorded the tweets that actually change history rather than every single one regardless of significance.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Virgil said:
This is a very terrifying thought.

I mean, I definitely see how cataloging this is valuable and would potentially be useful to researchers and academics and future-people who want to try to figure out where everything started to go wrong...

... but still. It's twitter.
Agreed

At least get the information from somewhere that has less unimportant crap obscuring the view of useful information...
 

Matt_LRR

Unequivocal Fan Favorite
Nov 30, 2009
1,260
0
0
Virgil said:
This is a very terrifying thought.

I mean, I definitely see how cataloging this is valuable and would potentially be useful to researchers and academics and future-people who want to try to figure out where everything started to go wrong...

... but still. It's twitter.
Only tangentally related, but I figure you'd know - why no twitter bird forum badge for adding your twitter account to your profile?

-------

Actually related: I can see -why- they're doing this, but I kinda hope they're weeding out everyone who types in text-speak, and all the porn bots. Cuz, seriously.

... maybe everything tagged with Justin Bieber, while they're at it.

-m
 

Strategia

za Rodina, tovarishchii
Mar 21, 2008
732
0
0
Oh good gods. Yeah, archiving personal letters and the like is understandable, after all those tend to chronicle things that were worth writing down. When, you know, informing other people about your personal situation actually took time and effort. When you didn't tweet about every single one of your wet goddamn farts. Archiving important tweets, OK, but the whole system? That's a new low in information technology.
 

aemroth

New member
Mar 17, 2010
59
0
0
Virgil said:
This is a very terrifying thought.

I mean, I definitely see how cataloging this is valuable and would potentially be useful to researchers and academics and future-people who want to try to figure out where everything started to go wrong...

... but still. It's twitter.
Finally, someone shares the same concerns as me. Terrifying indeed. I see it as another step, along with cloud computing, mass surveillance and all the remaining phenomenons that stem from our technological and increasingly online age. Soon enough we'll be hearing and reading something in the lines of"Big Brother is watching you" all over the place :p
 

swenson

New member
Sep 5, 2009
119
0
0
That is incredibly cool! I've actually worried before about how future generations will be able to learn about us if all of the sites we spend so much time on go down and there's no other copy available. A project like this, though it might seem trivial, could prove to have unimaginable wealth for historians of the future, if for no other reason than to find out how people of our generation thought and acted. Very neat.
 

GodKlown

New member
Dec 16, 2009
514
0
0
My first reaction was "you have got to be fucking kidding me". The more I think about it, the more this is like a digital version of a time capsule. But you know, instead of digging up a forty year old Twinkie, future generations can marvel at Oprah's weight struggle and Lindsey Lohan's drug abuse through the years.
While being tax-payer funded, what qualifications do you need to document Tweets? And how much money would one be paid from the Library of Congress to store Tweets?
Historical moments since 2006, I'm cool with them archiving that. Your mom saying she is sitting in the back yard and watching Desperate Housewives online? Yeah, nobody gives a hot poop about that now, I doubt the future will give a shit either.

If you Twitter, I already pity you, but just start posting the grossest and strangest Tweets you can about anything. Talk about getting drunk, doing crystal meth and jerking off to 2 Girls 1 Cup. Better yet, just start making totally ridiculous predictions about technology. Take that, future!

We're already seen the future in Back To The Future 2, so start bitching about the lack of flying cars and hover boards and self-lacing Nikes, then blame people in the future for making the present suck ass.
 

Chimaera

Niche Game Fangirl
Oct 28, 2005
210
0
0
"A lot of it is going to be trivial fluff,"

More like most. I wonder if there were a way to opt out how many people would use it? :)
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
There may be a good thing from this. Now Congress can show people all the insanely stupid shit their typing, probably getting them to stop.
...

Shut up, let me dream.