Okay, I imagine all of us got this one, and I'm surprised no one has mentioned yet: that Europe and Asia are different continents. What made this especially egregious in my case was that I was told this by my parents
right after they had given me a globe. I spent hours trying to find that seventh continent they assured me was there, and when they finally got tired of waiting for me, they explained. When I asked why what was obviously one continent was referred to as two, the best answer they could give me was "it just is". That answer has never been satisfactory to answer any question, under any circumstance, in the entire history of humanity, and naturally I was no exception. The exchange at school a few days later didn't help, either; my teacher was very surprised when I corrected her, and when she insisted that the two were separate, and I asked why, she finally paused, thought about it, and then said "well, I guessed people were wrong about that one". I was immensely pleased at having been able to find and correct this, and so was very surprised when the teacher promptly went back to talking about "the seven continents". When I raised my hand to call her on it again, she ignored me. Though I didn't know what the words meant, this taught me an important lesson about ideological inertia and general human stupidity; that glorious team that brings us such joys as Daylight Saving Time ("we can reduce energy consumption by consuming more energy!") global warming denialism ("planetary temperatures don't rapidly undergo major shifts- that whole 'Permian extinction' was just the result of legalized gay marriage and, um, time machines!" and international metrification


retty much the whole imperial history of France!:

.
Remus said:
All this reminded me of a scene I saw in the Starz series "DaVinci's Demons". In it, Leonardo is touring the Pope's private library and at one point comes across a huge, very toothy skull. "The skull of a Dragon" the Pope says. (it's a T-Rex) It's just too bad Leo didn't pull some facial reconstruction bit where he would draw skin around said skull only to come out with one very toothy bird.
Well, one very toothy
dinosaur; there's a reason no one takes cladistics seriously. But since that would've been in 15th century, long before anyone had any real idea what 'dinosaurs' were, it would, at best, have been "a somewhat birdlike dragon".