Dammit, I was gonna link to this, it really did make me think of it.Freebird. said:Marvellous stuff. The end was crazy and the first half reminded me of this.
I mean only if it was 1 to 1 scale with the the ink. So all of the ink in the graph was in the bar.Mullahgrrl said:whell what the heck else could it be representing?AngryMongoose said:No. Not necessarily.
Unless it reprents the entirely of the black ink in each panel.
Those graphs are stupid, need numbers and units!
were you introduced to them through the escapist? Because they have been around a long time in internet terms. I see you made that account to post that comment so it's hard to tell how long you have been watching there stuff. Anyway my point being they have had literally hundreds of episodes so if you haven't seen all the backlog it would probably help give you a fuller picture of where they are as compared to where they've been.microski said:LRR has gone so downhill since kathleen started having a bigger part in it. I'm sorry, but it's the truth. The funniest bit of this video was the part after the credits.
I've been watching them from pretty much day 1. They've had some great videos back in the day, but lately the humor has been lacking. Any video involving kathleen usually does not interest me or my friends (though there are a couple).Eric the Orange said:were you introduced to them through the escapist? Because they have been around a long time in internet terms. I see you made that account to post that comment so it's hard to tell how long you have been watching there stuff. Anyway my point being they have had literally hundreds of episodes so if you haven't seen all the backlog it would probably help give you a fuller picture of where they are as compared to where they've been.
Also on a side note, good and bad are opinions, so they cannot be considered "truth".
Good one.chris11246 said:By reading this post you the number of readers who have read a part of or all of the post.
Normally I would try to respond with a witty post or a short uninteresting phrase such as LOL.
I might quote a personthen respond to what they posted or show that I agree with it.ucciolord1 said:I am afraid.That was fantastic.....Freebird. said:Marvellous stuff. The end was crazy and the first half reminded me of this.
Yeah, I suppose they could have infinity as a number but i still think tit should be marked out.AngryMongoose said:I mean only if it was 1 to 1 scale with the the ink. So all of the ink in the graph was in the bar.Mullahgrrl said:whell what the heck else could it be representing?AngryMongoose said:No. Not necessarily.
Unless it reprents the entirely of the black ink in each panel.
Those graphs are stupid, need numbers and units!
Instead, if it has a scale we can't see, it doesn't have to be infinitely long.cc
No, I mean it wouldn't need to go to infinity. It could be convergent. Since, although increasing the size of the middle bar would increase the amount of ink in the middle, thus necessitating an increase in the size of the middle bar, the amount the bar would need to increase each time would be diminished, and in the same way 0.9 recurring is exactly one, and not inifinity, this would have an exact value, and would not have to be infinity. (though, in this case, infinity would also work).Mullahgrrl said:snip
Yeah, I suppose they could have infinity as a number but i still think tit should be marked out.
Charlie Brooker's video = awesomeFreebird. said:Marvellous stuff. The end was crazy and the first half reminded me of this.