Me too. It's rare to see such a humble, honest politician.ManiacEskimo said:I'd vote for Andy. Andy 2015!
So anyone knows how voting works in Canada? It has something to do with... geese, right?
Me too. It's rare to see such a humble, honest politician.ManiacEskimo said:I'd vote for Andy. Andy 2015!
Ha ha ha. Did you notic how Paul couldn't help but smile in that bit?mariomario said:Can Paul sobbing be my ringtone?
It might be wiser to learn what his policies are or at least what party he leads, rather than vote solely on personality. Something tells me, Andy would rule with an iron fist.Dr Funfrock said:I'd absolutely vote for Andy for Prime Minister, but given the competition I'm not even sure that's a compliment.
I think it's actually just a silly gag dating back to the previous Rapidfire series. The detective(Graham) would come in and use the same kind of un-logic to figure out who the criminal was, at which point the officer on duty would reveal that they already knew that because the criminal confessed or something else equally obvious. One of the cops(James) made multiple appearances and talked about becoming a detective himself. Now he is, and he and Graham work together solving crimes with their crazy random-fact logic.gardian06 said:so the first 3 episodes including the rapid-fire-detectives seemed to be more "in a round about chain we can connect anything, and get the right answer," but with this episode it felt more like "now we are just guessing because we have no clue, but these sting of words."
so the question is: is this supposed to be a social commentary on the state of police work in Canada, and potentially around the world, or a testament to how random knowledge can in fact be a good thing, but only in given situations?
I think it would be more along the lines of the seedy salesman1 will always have a different seedy salesman2 which will always have a different seedy salesman item. now the causality loop begins when each of the 2 seedy salesmen each have a seedy salesman with a seedy salesman, and one of them is selling the original seedy salesman. though I know seedy salesman sells snuggy cultist who worships the demon who will reign seedy salesmen on the world sorry if that was an idea already.Moontouched-Moogle said:I think it's actually just a silly gag dating back to the previous Rapidfire series. The detective(Graham) would come in and use the same kind of un-logic to figure out who the criminal was, at which point the officer on duty would reveal that they already knew that because the criminal confessed or something else equally obvious. One of the cops(James) made multiple appearances and talked about becoming a detective himself. Now he is, and he and Graham work together solving crimes with their crazy random-fact logic.gardian06 said:so the first 3 episodes including the rapid-fire-detectives seemed to be more "in a round about chain we can connect anything, and get the right answer," but with this episode it felt more like "now we are just guessing because we have no clue, but these sting of words."
so the question is: is this supposed to be a social commentary on the state of police work in Canada, and potentially around the world, or a testament to how random knowledge can in fact be a good thing, but only in given situations?
It hurts a bit to explain the joke, but now you know, and knowing is half the battle!
Also, loved the stinger at the end. But I wonder: If Kathleen buys the sunglasses, does she also have to buy the seedy salesman?
And if the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handyDVS BSTrD said:Remember Andy I'm pulling for ya, we're all in this together.