Wait, it took them six months to work out that it "might be a monster, or it might be a boat"? Really?
Anyhow, I'm incredibly skeptical for two reasons. One, the Loch Ness Monster Fan Club aren't exactly likely to be unbiased in terms of "is the monster real?" queries. And two, the Daily Mail are hardly considered by most to be a reputable bastion of journalistic integrity...
Anyhow, I'm incredibly skeptical for two reasons. One, the Loch Ness Monster Fan Club aren't exactly likely to be unbiased in terms of "is the monster real?" queries. And two, the Daily Mail are hardly considered by most to be a reputable bastion of journalistic integrity...