These people just want to cause mayhem. They don't care who gets hurt. That said, there's simply no excuse for attacking any member of public service who's attempting to do their duty, be they a fireman, paramedic or a police officer.Biosophilogical said:See this bit? That pisses me off. Unless a fireman is using his hose as a weapon (or his axe/oxygen tank/etc) you don't interrupt them (especially not to attack them!). I'd sort of understand attacking a police officer during a riot (I wouldn't necessarily support it, but it'd at least make some semblance of sense) but a firey? Next they'll be attacking paramedics! And then what!? Who could you possibly attack in a riot that makes less sense than a medical professional or a fireman?BGH122 said:Rioters attacked firemen who attempted to put out the blaze and attacked members of the public who assisted, or even spoke to, the rescue services.
I've updated the OP with the new riot locations.
No, we don't use those. We use Sprinter vans with a mesh grille over their windshield. We're heavily under-equipped.Mad Stalin said:You don't have those armored vans in the british police force?Deathninja19 said:OK for one you've obviously never been to England or seen one of our towns or cities, are streets are so small you can barely fit an average sized car through some roads if there are parked cars. We couldn't have bigger cars if we wanted to (which we don't because our gas prices are so high).Mad Stalin said:Well, brits are bad at rioting, but contain with teargas and beanbag shotguns? Or you know, bigger cars
Second we're great at rioting, we're just terrible at containing them. Part of the reason in this case is that the areas are sort of police no go areas due to the amount of violence is directed towards police on a daily basis. Shouldn't be like this but there's nothing you can do really.