M.A.G.
- Thread starter Alotak
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Sorry I though 1337 talk would come off as sarcastic. The game still doesn't look as good as the E3 2005 trailer.Jumplion said:
I was going more along the lines of the drunk quote, which seems quite accurate.shatnershaman said:
Though I have yet to meet more then three people who know about RvB, and less who actually watch the show well enough to know the so-called "universal quote".
This is over the span of a few years... Though I proved my point with "friends" just like he proved his point with "friends", so it's like trying to say "Germany is awesome because Jack and Jill gets high", the numbers are too low to speak anything. Get a poll together, asking people if they know of RvB, or better yet, just ask them if they know of that specific "universal quote" without mentioning RvB... and we'll start to talk numbers... =p
my only concern is in how fluid the animation will be. considering the amount of data being transferred in these massive games, i doubt the animation is going to be fluid since it will ramp up and down based on the connection speed of other users...
now, if 10% of players have crappy connections, it's less noticable when you have a 20 player game, since you'll only notice 2 people who glitch around. but now apply that 10% to 200 people, and you could have an entire squad of 20 glitchy players.
if you walked into the right grouping of people, the game would look like crap.
now, if 10% of players have crappy connections, it's less noticable when you have a 20 player game, since you'll only notice 2 people who glitch around. but now apply that 10% to 200 people, and you could have an entire squad of 20 glitchy players.
if you walked into the right grouping of people, the game would look like crap.
What i'm worried is that what ever system they use to organize all the players and objectives, that it will become too complicated.
It would be so organized that it would turn complicated and it would be more of a Army Simulator than a game if it isn't that already.
It would be so organized that it would turn complicated and it would be more of a Army Simulator than a game if it isn't that already.
Objective 1 ....... patrol town square *COMPLETE*Indigo_Dingo said:
Objective 2 ....... build sandbag defense bunker, here's a shovel
in real life, the military handles logistics. a sim like experience would be a series of my examples with small brief uneventful excersions into the city. maybe a firefight twice a month.Indigo_Dingo said:
given the premise, i doubt that any game design would even begin to approach a sim-like experience. and with that many players in one game, they are probably going to design the levels and scenarios to maximize casualties and action.
I own all three consoles (Although the ps3 see's less use than my 360) but that's like saying it's ok for the hooker i just hired to charge $500 for a blowjob because she's an awesome sushi chef.Bulletinmybrain said:
Well it depends, did she make you sushi afterwards? Similarly, will the PS3 be able to play blu-ray movies whenever you get them?Decoy Doctorpus said:
If the answer is no, then you have just paid for a 360.
If the answer is yes, you have just paid for a PS3.
You don't have to defend it. Sony is a corporation made up of hundreds if not thousands of people including a team of highly trained (and paid) lawyers waiting to sue minor websites into oblivion. They can take care of themselves.Indigo_Dingo said:
No you're about hookers./sarcasmIndigo_Dingo said:
DICE should really start suing with all the people knocking them off (battlefront,new LOTR battlefront,Frontlines,Undertow,MAG)
EDIT:
And people that to edit wikipedia's articles.Decoy Doctorpus said: