Man Goes to Jail for Being an Internet Troll

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Man Goes to Jail for Being an Internet Troll


A U.K. man has been sentenced to 18 weeks in jail for being an internet troll.

Being a troll cost Colm Coss of Manchester more than just some hate mail and a flood of angry forum replies. The 36-year-old unemployed man will also have to give up a few months of freedom because he "preyed on bereaved families" by posting rude messages on websites dedicated to reality TV personality mauled to death [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade_Goody] by a dog. The court was told that among his comments, Coss claimed that he had "had sex with the victims' dead bodies."

"You preyed on bereaved families who were suffering trauma and anxiety," Chairwoman of the bench Pauline Salisbury told the defendant. "We know you gained pleasure and you aren't sorry for what you did."

Coss was charged with "sending malicious communications that were grossly offensive," which is apparently illegal in the U.K. under the Communications Act 2003. He would have got away with it, too, except he sent pictures of himself to his neighbors saying that he was an "internet troll," one of whom passed the pictures on to police for some reason. Coss admitted to being a troll during a subsequent police interview.

And now it's time for some audience participation. What do you think is most disturbing: The fact that being a troll is literally against the law in the U.K., the fact that Coss' neighbors felt it necessary to inform the police that there was a troll living down the street or the fact that the police thought the matter was important enough to warrant an interview and then formal charges?

I don't like trolls. They're attention-seeking jerks who will say anything to get a rise out of people. When they get demolished in a forum thread, or banned, or even punched in the mouth, I don't mind at all. But I'm having a hard time believing that someone is going to jail for it. Any society that puts people in prison for being a dick is a society that's in deep trouble indeed.

Source: Wordsmith [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-11650593] for the tip.


Permalink
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
That is too funny. Guess realID might have cut down on trolling... at least in the UK.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
It's more then trolling in this case, it's enjoying the act of traumatizing traumatized people. If he was trolling somewhere else on the same idea, he wouldn't have been arrested.
 

SeanTheSheep

New member
Jun 23, 2009
10,508
0
0
Is it just me that sees the irony that he's managed to be extremely succesful as a troll?
He 1) Got a rise out of people
2) Got a rise out of people affected by an issue, and
3) He got a rise out of the authorities.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
TheAmazingTGIF said:
This seems like a breach of free speech (I know that it didn't happen in the US, but still)...
He does seem like a massive tool but that is what free speech is about. This could be concerning to people on the internet in the UK.
Certain kinds of speech are NOT protected. "I fucked your dead child" is one of the unprotected ones.
 

Nick Timperman

New member
Apr 4, 2010
1
0
0
Then again, I don't think the U.K> constitution gives free speech and such... Since it's under a monarchy. So it's probably whatever the king or queen decides.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
For those interested, The Communications Act (2003) [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/contents]. There is 411 pages of it though.

Nick Timperman said:
Then again, I don't think the U.K> constitution gives free speech and such... Since it's under a monarchy. So it's probably whatever the king or queen decides.
Uh...REALLY suggest you read this. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom] Queen 'Beth doesn't really make the laws anymore.
 
Jun 26, 2009
7,508
0
0
Nick Timperman said:
Then again, I don't think the U.K> constitution gives free speech and such... Since it's under a monarchy. So it's probably whatever the king or queen decides.
The Queen has only the power to deny laws from becoming true. She can't make laws, it's not a total Monarchy.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Well, this is the kind of thing I'm talking about when it comes to other countries in various debates where I talk about how the US has the highest level of freedom and human rights in the world, then someone fires back that it's not true and points out how their nation (which will be something like the UK) is ahead of us according to some statistic or poll, and then something like this happens.

To be honest, I see both sides of the equasion, and why people want to curtail behaviors like this, but to be honest dealing with jerks is the lesser of two evils when it comes to putting people in jail for being jerks given that it opens so much room for abuse.

What's more, freedom of speech, doesn't just mean "freedom of speech you like or agree with" but the freedom to say what you want without these kinds of consequences. Once you start regulating the jerks, it turns into people simply wanting to regulate anyone they don't agree with.

There is no requirement that you have to be nice to anyone, that you have to like everyone, or that you have to remain silent about those you don't like. That's what freedom is all about.

Yes, words can hurt, and do a lot of damage, but as Heinlan put it "You can either have freedom or safety, never both".

That's simply my take on things. There is no doubt in my mind that this guy was an obnoxious trouble maker, indeed he reminds me vaguely of Fred Phelps without the religious overtones, but the police shoulx not have been involved, and sending him to jail was both overkill, and an affront to human rights.
 

GoGo_Boy

New member
May 12, 2010
218
0
0
lacktheknack said:
TheAmazingTGIF said:
This seems like a breach of free speech (I know that it didn't happen in the US, but still)...
He does seem like a massive tool but that is what free speech is about. This could be concerning to people on the internet in the UK.
Certain kinds of speech are NOT protected. "I fucked your dead child" is one of the unprotected ones.
Quoted for truth.

I mean who cares if it's the internet. He just went way, way too far.
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
TheAmazingTGIF said:
This seems like a breach of free speech (I know that it didn't happen in the US, but still)...
He does seem like a massive tool but that is what free speech is about. This could be concerning to people on the internet in the UK.
Shout "I've got a fucking bomb" in an airport and see how free your speech is. There is no free speech unless you understand it as the ability to say what you want but you may have to accept the consequences.
 

Crimsane

New member
Apr 11, 2009
914
0
0
What do you think is most disturbing: The fact that being a troll is literally against the law in the U.K., the fact that Coss' neighbors felt it necessary to inform the police that there was a troll living down the street or the fact that the police thought the matter was important enough to warrant an interview and then formal charges?
Hmm, puzzler of the week. A! No, C! Wait, B! No no no, A!
 

Tomtitan

New member
Jun 7, 2010
60
0
0
Nick Timperman said:
Then again, I don't think the U.K> constitution gives free speech and such... Since it's under a monarchy. So it's probably whatever the king or queen decides.
Maybe if you travelled back in time 200 years that would be the case. The Queen is a figurehead monarch, she has basically no political power. Seriously, what kind of place do you think the UK is? We have a democratically elected government just like you guys.

And this guy got what he deserved. Free speech isn't something that can be used to hide from this kind of thing. You can't say that kind of thing and then say you're protected under free speech, that's not what we have it for.

You forget, this isn't a random comment on a forum like this full of people well-versed in internet culture and people who know a troll when we see one. These comments were on a community that isn't aware of this kind of stuff (although I fear the community that congregates around Jade Goody...).

Edit: Fun fact: The UK is basically the only country in the world without a written constitution. Think about it, there's been no massive revolution in the UK during which there was a sudden change in the political system (at least in a thousand years anyway), which is usually when a country writes a constitution.