I personally think Marriage is a silly concept.
But hey if they wanna do it that's their choice.
But hey if they wanna do it that's their choice.
Six months? That's an incredibly short period of time, you'd barely know the other person.Kopikatsu said:My understanding is that the general rule of thumb was marriage is expected/acceptable after six months of dating. My grandparents got married at 18 after dating for four months, and they were married for over fifty years (up until my grandfather passed away).
As for myself, I've wanted to be married since I was about twelve. 'Course, I'm much older now and still have yet to ever be in a relationship of any kind, so I kind of gave up on the idea of ever being married (or in a relationship).
Living together first should be mandatory. How do you know you want to spend the rest of your life with someone when you haven't been exposed to their dirty socks on the floor?Abomination said:In this day and age of more independent oriented individuals, less clandestine culture and equality between the sexes both financially and socially I would consider it quite foolish to get married before one is closer to 30 than 20.
I suggest living together and being in a "financial relationship" for at least 2 years before even trying to make it a legally binding arrangement.
One might think they've "found the one" but who the "one" is now and who the "one" is after a career change can be a different beast altogether.
It's why the idea of getting married after 6 months of "dating" seems just absurd. What is "dating" anyway? Going to the movies every weekend? Maybe a nice lunch or dinner. A "fun outing"? That's no way of establishing how well you're going to live with someone. You're only spending time enjoying yourselves, of COURSE that person is going to seem like the perfect match when the only thing you do with them is fun stuff.Colour-Scientist said:Six months? That's an incredibly short period of time, you'd barely know the other person.Kopikatsu said:My understanding is that the general rule of thumb was marriage is expected/acceptable after six months of dating. My grandparents got married at 18 after dating for four months, and they were married for over fifty years (up until my grandfather passed away).
As for myself, I've wanted to be married since I was about twelve. 'Course, I'm much older now and still have yet to ever be in a relationship of any kind, so I kind of gave up on the idea of ever being married (or in a relationship).Living together first should be mandatory. How do you know you want to spend the rest of your life with someone when you haven't been exposed to their dirty socks on the floor?Abomination said:In this day and age of more independent oriented individuals, less clandestine culture and equality between the sexes both financially and socially I would consider it quite foolish to get married before one is closer to 30 than 20.
I suggest living together and being in a "financial relationship" for at least 2 years before even trying to make it a legally binding arrangement.
One might think they've "found the one" but who the "one" is now and who the "one" is after a career change can be a different beast altogether.
Six months? Hell to the no. I don't know anybody who is comfortable with that. My family, even my grandparents, have always felt that a year is the bare minimum, and even then that's still pushing it. Two or three years is much more inside their comfort zone. And that's definitely my rule, as well. Two or three years, and a few good arguments.Kopikatsu said:My understanding is that the general rule of thumb was marriage is expected/acceptable after six months of dating. My grandparents got married at 18 after dating for four months, and they were married for over fifty years (up until my grandfather passed away).
One of my cousins got married at 21, and I know a work friend's child got married at 19 (though in that case, they were religious and it's not unusual). I understand your point and used to think the same, but I've since changed my mind.Colour-Scientist said:As you can probably guess, I am totally baffled by their desire to get married so young. I mean, if you know you want to spend the rest of your life with this person, what's the rush into marriage? Surely, you have all of the time in the world to do it.
Where do you live? Eighteen-dickety-two?LetalisK said:22 is about right for where I live. 25 is "what took you so long"? 30 and people wonder what's wrong with you.
This is not a paragraph that reflects all that well on you.KingsGambit said:The largest problem we now face is that women are financially independant and choosing to leave marriage and kids much later, if at all. And it's easy to forget that by the time a woman is 30, she's lost half her child-bearing years (and the better half too).