I think this sums it up nicely. Completely agree.bob1052 said:The best of DC heroes are better than the best of Marvell but as a whole Marvell is better than DC.
I think this sums it up nicely. Completely agree.bob1052 said:The best of DC heroes are better than the best of Marvell but as a whole Marvell is better than DC.
By best heroes of dc you mean hero I take it XDbob1052 said:The best of DC heroes are better than the best of Marvell but as a whole Marvell is better than DC.
Here are some thread categories that are sure to receive a lock:
Vs. Threads: Who would win in a fight: A or B? Which is better: X or Y? These are dull, repetitive, and are surefire ways to start a flame war. All three things that The Escapist does not wish to be recognised as.
Kpt._Rob said:Can I ask if you've ever actually read any DC comics? I used to feel the same until I started reading them, and realized what an interesting cast they actually have. There are obvious cases, like Superman, who we tend to think of as being more of a superpowered boyscout than an interesting character, but once you actually read some good Superman comics you find that he's really a much more engaging character than our perceptions of him might lead us to believe. Is he overpowered? I'm not going to say that he's not, but the best writers tend to craft stories in which that element of being overpowered is actually his weakness (check out the TPB for Superman: Sacrifice [written by Geoff Johns] if you don't believe me). He's a deontologically motivated character, and that leads those who don't think about the complexities that role can bring to dismiss him, but there really a lot more there than most people realize, because often his biggest conflicts are internal. I don't have time to get into what an incredible character Wonder Woman is (though you could check out Movie Bob's Big Picture episode about her if you wanted to see some more interesting parts of her history), she also plays a really interesting role in Superman: Sacrifice as well. I would also advocate for Green Lantern (specifically Hal Jordan and John Stewart), as interesting characters, especially in that they work well as foils to Batman.TheHighDino said:DC have no good superheroes (apart from Batman obviously) and only a handful of decent super villains, The Joker, The Riddler.. etc...
Speaking of Batman, after I started reading DC comics, I eventually came to feel that Batman is actually one of the more boring characters from the DC universe. Like any of their characters the right writer can make all the difference, but more often than not he's just kind of a stiff board of a character who uses being dark and mysterious in place of having actual character, and ironically enough is not that different from Sinestro [Green Lantern's nemesis] in his approach to crime fighting (only stopping short of actually being Sinestro in that he doesn't kill).
I'm not going to say that DC is better. I tend to read DC more than Marvel, but the idea that you could dismiss either of these big companies is kind of ridiculous. They've both got intricate complex histories with a pantheon of characters (some more unique than others, granted), and I feel like if you just write one or the other off, you miss the opportunity to experience some really good stories.
Alright mate, sorry this got you so riled up. I'm only saying I prefer Marvel, especially because I totally 100% agree with Royal King's statement.GiantRaven said:snip
I'm only saying, this sounds right to me. In the Marvel universe, MOST of the characters have a limit and it makes SOME sense as to why there are so many around. Spider-Man, Daredevil, Cyclops, Captain America, Black Panther... all susceptible to your common variety bullet. In the DC universe, you have Superman, who can do nearly everything, who is pretty much invincible (except to Kryptonite, obviously)... and to draw on King's point, most other heroes seem obsolete next to a guy like Superman.Royal King said:Marvel wins, and it's all Superman's fault.
In Marvel, you have invincible guys (Sentry, for example) but none of them are mainstream poster boys. When you look at a Marvel hero, you don't think "Is this guy weaker than Spider-man?" Or "Is he as good as Wolverine?" You don't think that because there are no centric characters that dominate the others.
...In DC, however, you have Superman.
The Flash runs fast. So does Superman. Wonder Woman is super strong, can fly, and deflect bullets. So can Superman. Aquaman can breath underwater. So can Superman...AND IN SPACE. (Or hold his breath, same thing.) Hawkman has a mace that smashes things. Superman has his fist that smashes more things. Martian Manhunter can read your mind. Superman can, apparently, erase your memories with a kiss. (Low blow!) Green Lantern can create anything his mind can think up. Typically this is not as powerful as a Superman punch. Or Laser eyes. Freeze breath.
The only hero that stands out is Batman, simply because he is everything that Superman is not. Not powerful, can't fly, can't reverse time by flying, etc.
So you have 1 all mighty God character and his totally-not-a-God friend that are interesting. Everybody else is NAGAS.
NAGAS stands for Not As Good As Superman.
I was actually using Quicksilver as a Flash equivalent to show that running really fast is a kind of stupid and limited power that shouldn't be capable of selling large quantities of comics. I understand that SOME people like reading The Flash and Aquaman, but some people also consider X-Men Origins: Wolverine to be an overwhelmingly good film.GiantRaven said:But readers do care THAT much about The Flash (using a DC equivalent speedster example). And if there are a lot of people willing to pay money to read about a certain character, why shouldn't there be a book about them?OrokuSaki said:Because they know that nobody really cares THAT much about Quicksilver.
Unfortunately everybody has their fanboy weakness. It was probably a good thing I decided to excuse myself from the thread for the sake of my forum healthbar.OrokuSaki said:You really are working double-time to defend DC Comics at every turn, aren't you?
Hey! He died of cancer! D:penguindude42 said:I also like DC, because they've got the Captain Marvel that doesn't suck.
~Tom<3