Mass Effect 2 - A Caboose review

Recommended Videos

Cab00se206

New member
Jul 9, 2008
160
0
0
This is kinda nostalgic. As Yahtzee had an opportunity to review Bioshock as one of his first video reviews on the Escapist and then got to rip on Bioshock 2, Mass Effect was the first review I ever wrote, and it was amazing to have the Escapist as a place where I could put my opinion. Now we come to the incredibly anticipated sequel, Mass Effect 2.

I my first review on Mass Effect, I lavished praise on the game for its unparalleled storytelling, engaging plot and awesome characters, but I was also critical of certain gameplay aspects. The Mako driving sequences were boring and fairly useless, the gunplay was a little awkward with unpredictable targeting, there were a few glaring graphics issues, and there were a few forced RPG sequences which could be somewhat dull, without much to change things up.

It's like Bioware used my review as a template for what to change. The gunplay has been overhauled and is a satisfying central gameplay mechanic, the Mako is gone (although whether the replacement is any better is a matter for debate), the game does a great job of breaking up RPG elements with frequent action sequences, and the graphics have been improved even further.

The biggest change is in how Mass Effect 2 uses gunplay. It is now one of the focuses of the game, and is the biggest innovation. Fighting is now very satisfying, and holds its own against most other third-person shooters. Whereas before you fired an unsatisfying-sounding gun until the red triangle on the enemy's torso disappeared and they unconvincingly ragdolled to the floor, now an enemy will flail as your shots hammer into him, before being dropped to the ground. It's really fun and very satisfying, and the introduction of armour classes and a very effective cover system adds a tactical element to the gunplay.

The weapons have been overhauled, with sniper rifles now being able to actually hit something (and consequently becoming one of the most awesome weapons of the game), the introduction of SMG's as a rapid-fire weapon for the classes that can't use the assault rifle, and the introduction of heavy weapons. Guns also use ammo now, instead of overheating, and this has changed the dynamic of the gunplay significantly. Also, in the first game there were two or three different models of each weapon, with the higher-tier weapons usually using a different gun model, but they all fire the exact same way. The only difference was the speed at which the enemy's health bar shrank. ME2 introduces different types of weapons, with an upgrade to the normal rapid-fire assault rifle with a burst-firing battle rifle, for example.

The look of ME2 has also improved significantly, even from its already excellent level. The addition of emotive lighting effects add a great new atmosphere to the game that really works, the graphics have been heightened even further, with far more realistic textures that avoid the 'plastic' look that some skin had in the first game. The biggest improvement, however, is in how the technology has been utilised. The horrific texture popping that plagued the first game has been almost entirely eliminated, and graphical glitches are far less common.

The game is also is a lot more cinematic, as much as some people consider 'cinematic' as a curse word, but when a great deal of the game is spent watching conversations, it really does feel like you're watching an interactive movie, and it really does work. When you are talking to somebody, they do not simply stand there, there is usually some degree of custom animations that really sells the fact that you're talking to individuals.

Bioware has continued its sterling tradition of engaging characters and emotive stories, and the conversations you have with your team-mates are wonderfully enjoyable. There'll be somebody who relates to you, no matter what kind of a person you are, and you may feel a level of friendship with these characters which make you forget you're playing a game. Bioware has put a lot of effort into making every member of your team a realistic, whole character with their own flaws and morals. You'll be hard pressed to find a cliché among your crew. Also, your choice of conversation topics may lead to more romantic options, this is a Bioware game after all, and with a surprising number of people. While in the first game your Commander Shepard could choose to pursue the human female, the human male, or the conveniently bisexual Asari, now your romantic choices have really opened up, and it's actually quit gratifying to see. If the player character can feel a friendship with some of these characters, why shouldn?t Shepard?

Another thing that Bioware has done exceptionally well is creating a deep universe for the player to experience. Walking around the Normandy, you can hear crewmen talking about personal worries, exploring a hub world you can listen in on people in their everyday lives, and by activating terminals across the galaxy you can listen to galactic news. It?s a really nice touch, and it never seems hackneyed or corny. My personal favourite is when a Salarian is talking with his Asari daughter about getting her mother a present because she will far outlive him. It?s different, interesting, and surprisingly moving.

Now despite my possibly fanboy-level rambling, Mass Effect 2 is by no means a perfect game. While the annoying Mako sections are gone, the plant scanning mechanism isn't much better. It takes less time, but it is possibly even more boring. Worse, the game hijacks you into doing them, at least if you want to do well in your mission. Also, there are less RPG aspects. There's even more to explore, but there is a distinct lack of sidequests. The ones you do find are either only found through the tedious planet-scanning bollocks, or are solved almost incidentally along the path of the main quests. It is also a bit of a small RPG by many standards. I played through 100% completion, mapping very star system and completing every quest I could find, and it still only took me 33 hours. Compared to Bioware's other epic, Dragon Age, where I played for 57 hours and got less than 75% completed, it is quite a short game for RPG standards.

Also, the game sometimes feels formulaic. You get dossiers on potential teammates, you go find them, they either need rescuing or can't leave until you do something for them, you finally get them to come with you, you talk to them, then they need your help with something personal, and by helping them you gain their trust and secure their loyalty. It does make sense, but by the tenth time it really doesn't feel natural. This is especially noticeable when the team member is gained late in the game, which I will demonstrate with an example. One of the team, an Asari named Samara, is the one I got last, and quite late in the game, since the other were all much cooler and I liked getting them more. When she was aboard, I talked with her once, and had barely left and went back up to the command deck, before she wanted to talk to me about her loyalty mission. It didn?t feel silly, however, until she said, in all seriousness,
"You're the first person I feel I could entrust this with."
Really? She?d known me all of an hour, and since I'd been playing a renegade character, I was a bit of a dick to her for most of that, and I was the only person she could trust? She must not have gotten out much.

Now, this may seem like an unbalanced review, like I was overly praising of the game beyond its merits, or that I 'forgot' to mention other problems, but in all honesty I cannot think of more negative aspects, and I can't diminish my praise for ME2 in all honesty. It is a worthy successor to a great game, lifted by the lessons of the first in an exceptional game.

Obviously it's not a game that everyone will love, as it's quite short and small in scope for RPG purists, and the long dialogue-driven periods without combat may irritate dedicated, twitchy FPS fans, but for everybody in between that bridge that vast gulf, Mass Effect 2 is an exceptional game, and I cannot think of a game that I would recommend higher.
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,367
0
0
Umm... is that suppose to be the Red vs. Blue Caboose? Because... you couldn't of missed the target if you been aiming the wrong way on another planet.
 

Daedalus1942

New member
Jun 26, 2009
4,164
0
0
It's just a shame you forgot to mention the glaringly obvious plotholes that they didn't even try to patch up, the numerous game breaking glitches or hell, even the fact that it's no longer a tactical real time rpg, but now a third person shooter.. but hey... what do I know?
 

Cab00se206

New member
Jul 9, 2008
160
0
0
Daedalus1942 said:
It's just a shame you forgot to mention the glaringly obvious plotholes that they didn't even try to patch up, the numerous game breaking glitches or hell, even the fact that it's no longer a tactical real time rpg, but now a third person shooter.. but hey... what do I know?
I'm interested to know, what plot holes and game-breaking glitches have you experienced? I haven't experienced either of those.

As for the fact that is is no longer a 'tactical real-time RPG', I'm not exactly sure what that means, but I don't think that the fact that its shooting gameplay has been improved to the standards of some third person shooters is a bad thing. Why do you?
 

bluebrino

New member
Dec 10, 2009
69
0
0
Cab00se206 said:
Daedalus1942 said:
It's just a shame you forgot to mention the glaringly obvious plotholes that they didn't even try to patch up, the numerous game breaking glitches or hell, even the fact that it's no longer a tactical real time rpg, but now a third person shooter.. but hey... what do I know?
I'm interested to know, what plot holes and game-breaking glitches have you experienced? I haven't experienced either of those.

As for the fact that is is no longer a 'tactical real-time RPG', I'm not exactly sure what that means, but I don't think that the fact that its shooting gameplay has been improved to the standards of some third person shooters is a bad thing. Why do you?
Yeah same here. I always hear people saying that there were major plot holes in it but never really came across any.

SPOILER ALERT
The only one I could think of was with the human reaper larva and how exactly did harvesting colonists make it. But I think that it was intentional to add to the mystery of the Collectors' goals.
 

Daedalus1942

New member
Jun 26, 2009
4,164
0
0
Cab00se206 said:
Daedalus1942 said:
It's just a shame you forgot to mention the glaringly obvious plotholes that they didn't even try to patch up, the numerous game breaking glitches or hell, even the fact that it's no longer a tactical real time rpg, but now a third person shooter.. but hey... what do I know?
I'm interested to know, what plot holes and game-breaking glitches have you experienced? I haven't experienced either of those.

As for the fact that is is no longer a 'tactical real-time RPG', I'm not exactly sure what that means, but I don't think that the fact that its shooting gameplay has been improved to the standards of some third person shooters is a bad thing. Why do you?
Let's see... where do I begin?
Okay, the plot for the 2nd game is written as though they didn't even try to tie it in with the first game (apart from the direct story elements that you yourself can alter).
In the first game Cerberus are the worst scum imaginable (bar Saren and the Geth. They use people in experiments, they murder entire colonies and destroy people's lives and in the second game, they're painted as a "noble organization with questionable methods".
In the first game (depending on one of the choices you make in regards to the backstory) Cerberus murdered your family [spoiler\]and suddenly in II you're fucking working for them... sure -.- Good one Drew (Karpyshyn).[/spoiler]

As well as in the second game you're suddenly introduced to the TIM (The Illusive Man). Who? Nobody knew who this fucker was (apart from people like me who've actually read the book series). No mention of him in the first game, not even a hint. Then suddenly, Bam (who is this guy?).
As for game breaking glitches... there were issues with the save files where you'd load a quicksave and end up right back at the start of a mission and i can't even count the number of times I'd use charge (I was a vanguard) and then somehow wind up trapped in the fucking ceiling. This is on the PC version (supposed to be the superiour version of the game).

As for the shooter elements, I'm not saying it wasn't done well. I'm saying they practically took every element a traditional action rpg has and deleted it.
They turned the game practically into JUST a 3rd person shooter / action game.
The levelling up system is story oriented (apart from previous levels due to the first game) and they're just utter bullshit.
They completely change the skills from the previous games and made the bullet types a skill.
Then the addition of ammunition (wtf!?).
The only remotely interesting part of the game for me that still managed to retain any depth was the conversations, and characters. If the new crewmembers hadn't been so interesting, I'd have put the game down.
It's short, much shorter than the previous games.
They removed the majority of sidequests, and essentially the entire game is collecting your crewmembers and then going off to fight the final battle. How unimaginative can you get?
I know you didn't like scanning the planets. I know I didn't like scanning the planets and I'm yet to meet someone who did.
I never really had many gripes about the mako itself, but alot of people did.
I never had a problem with the controls on either 360 or PC (i own both).
I can see how people didn't enjoy the mako due to the same landscapes being copypasta, but I loved the whole searching the actual surface of the planet for my next quest, money or hidden insignia/matriarchal writings.

These aren't even half of what was wrong with the game, but I don't feel I need to elaborate any further.
As it stands, Mass Effect II is my most hated game released so far this year.
I absolutely loved the first game, and am quite disappointed at the potential that both the books and sequel have squandered in what were almost limitless possibilities in a world containing what could have been an incredibly rich, and rewarding series.
 

Rylot

New member
May 14, 2010
1,817
0
0
There weren't any plot holes. To have a plot holes it would've needed a plot. The character development was nice but to have that take the place of the story was kinda pointless. The whole thing with the collectors was dumb and as transparent as a "plot" can get, not to mention the "human reaper" thing at the end was hilarious. I would love to know what went on at that meeting:
"Crap, we need a really good final boss."
"I've got it! A human reaper!"
"That is literally the worst idea I've ever heard."
"Do you have a better idea?"
"Lets roll with it."
 

Daedalus1942

New member
Jun 26, 2009
4,164
0
0
Rylot said:
There weren't any plot holes. To have a plot holes it would've needed a plot. The character development was nice but to have that take the place of the story was kinda pointless. The whole thing with the collectors was dumb and as transparent as a "plot" can get, not to mention the "human reaper" thing at the end was hilarious. I would love to know what went on at that meeting:
"Crap, we need a really good final boss."
"I've got it! A human reaper!"
"That is literally the worst idea I've ever heard."
"Do you have a better idea?"
"Lets roll with it."
I did actually have a better idea.
My idea would have been they were creating a human reaper in the image of Shepherd (and not a thousand feet tall).
Think of how many government factions, species, and minds that could have indoctrinated without anybody even knowing.
Also, the plot from the first game was fairly decent (at least passable), whereas the second game was just woeful.
I only pointed how it didn't even try to tie in with the previous game.
I didn't go into how badly written the whole story is, but you've pretty much said that for me, and I thank you.
 

The_Healer

New member
Jun 17, 2009
1,720
0
0
For such a large game with so many options I think you need to review it in more detail.

Although I enjoyed the game, I found it quite lacking in an RPG sense and although I haven't played an rpg with relationships before, I found them quite artificial.

But hey, it is a video game...
 

Superior Mind

New member
Feb 9, 2009
1,535
0
0
Heh, I wrote a review for ME2 on IMDB, I pretty much made the exact same points - including the fact that I had previously written a review and that Bioware seemed to have checked off all the points I made and corrected the issues. Good review, more in depth than mine, nice work.
 

ZephrC

Free Cascadia!
Mar 9, 2010
750
0
0
Oh, didn't you know? You're not allowed to praise ME2, if you try all the RPG snobs pop up out of the woodwork. They think any game that isn't made exactly how they prefer it is completely inferior and you're obviously a stupid Halo fanboy if you like it.

I used to like RPGs, but these morons have nearly ruined the genre for me. (Okay, I still like playing them as much as ever, but I'm far less likely to admit it in public because I don't want to be associated with these brain-damaged wastes of space.)
 

ZephrC

Free Cascadia!
Mar 9, 2010
750
0
0
Rylot said:
I did like ME2, it just had its problems.
Oh, I wasn't talking about you. That whole Human Reaper thing really wasn't done very well at all, and the game wasn't perfect. You don't even have to like it. I just get mad at certain people that seem to believe that anyone who does like it is inferior.
 

Rylot

New member
May 14, 2010
1,817
0
0
Those people generally make life suck, even when you agree with them.
 

Daedalus1942

New member
Jun 26, 2009
4,164
0
0
ZephrC said:
Rylot said:
I did like ME2, it just had its problems.
Oh, I wasn't talking about you. That whole Human Reaper thing really wasn't done very well at all, and the game wasn't perfect. You don't even have to like it. I just get mad at certain people that seem to believe that anyone who does like it is inferior.
my main gripe was the plot holes they didn't bother to try and fix in relation to the first game, and the fact they turned what could have had limitless potential, into what essentially is now a third person shooter. That and the whole Cerberus thing, seriously wtf Karphyshyn?
-edit- Also the cover system was fucking woeful... Seriously Deadrising had a better cover system and that was just hiding behind a wall so you could shoot at the guy who couldn't see you.