McDonald's Boss Says Videogames Are Making Kids Fat

Recommended Videos

Girlysprite

New member
Nov 9, 2007
290
0
0
while they may raise a somewhat vbalid point I dare to say that they were a much bigger factor in the Obesity problem then videogames. However, it has been proben that games these days don't move around as much as their grandparents do. And no, I dont mean their grandparents when they were children, I mean their grandparents NOW. The eldery move around more then the kinds, and that's just sad.
Also a point of irony, in a lot of (poor) neighboorhoods, a macdonalds playground is the only (clean & safe) playground nearby.
 

tarantulaboy52

New member
Jan 4, 2008
10
0
0
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.Oops, I think a little pee came out.

But seriously, videogames may be partly to blame for children's more sedentary lifestyle but they aren't pumping our bodies full of cholestorol and trans-fats.

Also, it's a tad hypocritical to point the finger at an industry that they are trying to break their advertising into (Guitar Hero III and a Big Mac anyone?).

This man should be ridiculed and then pitied for his stupid claims. If he keeps it up perhaps Sony might head-hunt him for their PS3 advertising campaign.
 

LisaB1138

New member
Oct 5, 2007
243
0
0
I can't believe the comments. Unfortunately, this is true; at least in part.

When there is a huge trend like obesity, one simply must look at what has changed.

I realize most of you are not my age (forty-six) so let me elaborate.

When I was a kid, we had McDonalds. I grew up in North Texas, and most of the food my mom made was fried with gravy. Thursday was chicken-fried steak day at school; Friday was fish--also fried. There was no "low fat" anything. These things did not exist. You put a cup of sugar into Kool-aid to sweeten it. We got diet soda finally in high school. It was called "Tab" and I started drinking it, not because of calorie concerns, but because I discovered that if I spilled it, everything didn't get sticky.

However, despite all of these extremely poor diet choices FORCED on us by our ignorance, I don't remember any "fat kids." Really. I'm sure there were some, but I honestly don't remember any kid being so overweight as to be called "fat." Overweight, certainly, but "fat" or "obese", no.

So why, despite all our newfound knowledge and expertise in diet, is there this explosion in obesity? The answer lies in what has changed.

What has changed is the incredible amount of screen time kids get today. When I was a kid, there wasn't 24 hour programming for kids. There was Saturday morning. Once a year, we got Charlie Brown Xmas and Rudolph. Once a year "The Wizard of Oz" came on. Woe to you if you missed them because it was 12 months before you'd get another chance. Now kids have probably 10 channels offering programming 24 hours a day. Now throw in video games and computers, and you've got a pretty hefty amount of butt-sitting going on.

A second factor is general laziness and parent paranoia or inability to say no. We walked or rode our bikes if we wanted to go to a friend's house. Now, kids are either too lazy (OMG--it's like a mile!) and parents give in to driving Chad four blocks, or the parents are too paranoid their kids are going to be snatched by a stranger to allow them to walk the four blocks.

People will always look for solutions that call for other people to change. So they point the finger at food rather than the real culprit, screen time, which would require actual effort to control. You can laugh at the McDonalds guy all you want, but remember as you're doing so you're sitting on butt in front of a screen.

Oh, BTW, if you ARE an "active kid" in a myriad of activities, my bet is that suddenly there's no time for Mom to cook a real meal, so you're pulling through the Micky D's drive through at least once a week. When I was a kid, McDonalds was a treat, not a regular meal. But I guess that's their fault too, right?
 

greygelgoog

New member
Dec 29, 2007
121
0
0
Personally, I blame the "Happy Meal." It operates on the same principle the tobacco industry does: get'em while they're young. Interestingly, all of my gamer friends are thin as rails so I question if gaming is the real problem.

But to directly address LisaB1138, screen time isn't the only thing to have changed in the last generation. Eating habits have shifted so that food is designed to be more convenient, often at the cost of nutritional value. This added convenience has also replaced the traditional 3 meals a day with day long grazing. And if kids are fatter, the baby boomers are leading the way. Your post seems to suggest that this is entirely a childhood issue that they're parents (coming from a more active era) don't suffer from. In fact the sedentary nature of the modern workplace, especially in combination with the aforementioned shifts in eating habits, means that adults today are in no position to complain about the kids' expanding waist lines.

As far as screen time goes, I think studies should more closely analyze the difference between watching TV and simply having the TV on. When I was growing up (back when children's entertainment was starting to hit it's stride as it's own industry) the TV was on but mostly as background noise. Both growing up and today seeing other peoples children I rarely see a child simply zoning out in front of a TV. When I have seen it, the child also looks so bored that you could simply roll a ball in front of them and watch as they leap at the opportunity to do something else.

As for gaming, every problem I've ever seen goes right back to that convenience issue I mentioned. Studies have shown that the difference between overweight and disgustingly fat is the simple difference of whether the potato chips are in easy reach or across the room. The amount of time doing nothing and the amount of chips eaten doesn't change, but you actually have to stand up to get them. This is anecdotally true for every gamer I've met. The fatter ones keep an entire buffet within arms reach so they never have to move. The thinner ones keep the food in that most surprising place, the kitchen. The only thing that changed is whether they have to actually get up to get the food. So really the problem comes down to how convenient food is (remember the days when you had to track your food for 4 days and then kill it yourself?), at which point McDonald's really is at fault for much of this. And snack foods, but I don't see them pointing fingers at other industries.
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
I don't think anyone's blaming McDonald's exclusively for the shocking rise of fatass kids in our culture. I certainly don't, and while I'm not quite the doddering oldster that LisaB is, I also remember a childhood in which Saturday mornings were sacred because they were the only real tv time I'd get all week, and computers were... well, they weren't. I walked to school, rode my bike all around the neighbourhood and beyond (as long as I stayed on our side of the main street - one of the benefits of a small town upbringing) and ate out rarely.

The problem here isn't that Easterbrook's comments aren't accurate (they are), but that he starts with promising words about complexity and then immediately points his finger at videogames. You can almost hear the triumphant "OHO!" in his voice. His interest in discussing the truth about childhood obesity begins and ends with his desire to deflect the blame to anything but his greaseball burger joint, and he deserves to be called on it.
 

LisaB1138

New member
Oct 5, 2007
243
0
0
Malygris said:
The problem here isn't that Easterbrook's comments aren't accurate (they are), but that he starts with promising words about complexity and then immediately points his finger at videogames. You can almost hear the triumphant "OHO!" in his voice. His interest in discussing the truth about childhood obesity begins and ends with his desire to deflect the blame to anything but his greaseball burger joint, and he deserves to be called on it.
So despite the fact that it's consumers' lifestyle choices making them fact, he's supposed to sit back and accept the blame and have his company treated like a villain? As if they're selling meth over the counter?

I agree that video games are an easy target, but to say the man has no right to call a spade a spade seems a bit much also. The truth is, I'm tired of groups pointing fingers at vending machines in schools. I'm tired of people acting like dupes crying "he made me" while they fill their baskets with chips and TiVo and WoW their butts to immensity.

Why can't someone admit that it's their own damn fault their kids are fat? That despite the incredible amount of marketing McDonalds does, they decided it was easier to give in to their kids whining twice a week and buy them that Happy Meal?

Last time I checked, the parent still controlled what food is purchased. To sit around and blame the quality of McDonalds food after you bought it again and again and again makes one either a hypocrite or an idiot.
 

ParkourMcGhee

New member
Jan 4, 2008
1,219
0
0
I play games up to 60 hours a week, and I actually have muscles and I don't even exercise that much... but guess what: I rarely eat McDonald's and I don't drink ANY fizzy drinks. Hmm. Just overthrew the whole of their argument V_V.
 

LisaB1138

New member
Oct 5, 2007
243
0
0
Not really. Weight gain is as individual as hair growth. Some people gain weight much easier than others. My kids play lots of games, but they aren't fat either. *shrugs*

There's always a witch hunt to find someone to blame when something goes wrong. People looking for the quick fix that alleviates themselves of both responsibility and action.
 

SamSloth

New member
Dec 23, 2007
12
0
0
strange how he doesn't blame reading books for contributing to obeseity, maybe this is an early sign of him being a moronic scaremongerer
 

Lampdevil

New member
Dec 12, 2007
49
0
0
Duck Sandwich said:
So a diet solely consisting of McDonalds food is unhealthy, but McDonalds food itself isn't unhealthy. Wow.
Well they do sell those nifty fruit and yogurt parfaits! :D

Ahem. It's a bit wrong-headed to point a finger at any particular aspect of the obesity equation, and go "Them! Those guys are SO MUCH WORSE than us! Lay off!" because it... doesn't accomplish much. Yes, kids really ought to go outside more and get more fruits and vegetables. If anyone doesn't know this at this point? They're incredibly ignorant. Parents need to step up and raise their kids right... but that's not news either, is it? Perhaps if the world had more smart parents, we'd have kids that were better off.

(Though all this AAAH FAT KIDS IT'S TERRIBLE OHNOES panic always sticks in my teeth a bit, every time it comes around. We should all be healthy and run marathons and not eat nothing but cheeseburgers, and it's good not to drop dead of a heart attack... but there are worse things in life than being a little pudgy.)
 

hickwarrior

a samurai... devil summoner?
Nov 7, 2007
429
0
0
But i don't favor most of the vegetables, because they are bitter or just don't have much taste to it, at all. It may be healthier(spelling?), but i think the saying 'bitter medicine helps better'(if not said like that) is more adequate for vegetables.

And about some mcdonald bigwig, i don't think he knows why games appeal to our audience, i guess. Still stupid to shift on games though. I just laughed the first time i read this.
 

Spinwhiz

New member
Oct 8, 2007
2,871
0
0
Yeah, another person blaming video games instead of placing the blame on whom it should be on...PARENTS! It doesn't even help to write about it here, because the people that need to listen aren't part of this community. Kick your fat ass kids outside and start meeting people. Play a sport, instrument, become part of a club (not a gaming club) ANYTHING to meet people. Fast food and sitting on your ass is bad for anyone! Either by itself isn't really that good for you either! For the love of god I wish I could take a 4x4 and jam it right up every morons ass...sideways. I'm not sure if that would help them understand, but it may jostle their brains a bit.
 

Girlysprite

New member
Nov 9, 2007
290
0
0
hickwarrior said:
But i don't favor most of the vegetables, because they are bitter or just don't have much taste to it, at all. It may be healthier(spelling?), but i think the saying 'bitter medicine helps better'(if not said like that) is more adequate for vegetables.
Open a cooking book on them ;) there are great ways to spice them up.
 

Duck Sandwich

New member
Dec 13, 2007
1,750
0
0
SamSloth said:
strange how he doesn't blame reading books for contributing to obeseity, maybe this is an early sign of him being a moronic scaremongerer
That's a damn good point. It's easy to blame whatever's popular. But where are all the nutjobs saying "OMG HARRY POTTER MADE LITTLE TIMMY FAT?"
 

Watershed

New member
Dec 10, 2007
106
0
0
Duck Sandwich said:
SamSloth said:
strange how he doesn't blame reading books for contributing to obeseity, maybe this is an early sign of him being a moronic scaremongerer
That's a damn good point. It's easy to blame whatever's popular. But where are all the nutjobs saying "OMG HARRY POTTER MADE LITTLE TIMMY FAT?"
Isn't Harry Potter busy being blamed for turning children into evil witches?