MCU Casualties

Recommended Videos

Cicada 5

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2015
3,140
1,711
118
Country
Nigeria
Im Lang said:
Agent_Z said:
Saltyk said:
The thing is that the MCU movies has always made it a big deal that they try to prevent casualties. It's not like they were Man of Steeling it and hoping people could survive two super powered beings ramming through their living room at the speed of sound. In Avengers 2, we see Tony send the Iron Legion in to protect the people in a local village, for example. In Avengers, they were making an effort to keep the fighting contained and making the effort to protect civilian populations, like when Cap went to protect that diner.

I won't say that I think those numbers are realistic, but in universe it makes sense that the casualties aren't absolutely catastrophic.
That's just it. The idea that casualties are this low is too straining on suspension of disbelief. Showing a higher body count won't make these people less herois, just show they have limits.
Limits they don't really have. Limits that only exist for the sake of telling a story, instead of a 2 minute confrontation and then the end credits. Comics are fun, cheap theater. If you're looking for something that's internally consistent, this was never the medium.

It's simple isn't it? If their regular activities led to a few megadeaths, it would be a completely different story. Since these are comic books, there is no more justification needed, any more than there is to bring a character back from the grave.
Superhero comics have changed a lot from what they were like in the 40s, 50s, 60s, 80 etc. And clearly, it's not just a few deaths considering the plot of Civil War. Saying "it's fiction, ignore it" isn't a valid excuse. I might as well be watching Looney Tunes.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
Those casualty numbers are ludicrously small, but I imagine they're rather hesitant to ascribe a massive death count to the Avengers, since at the end of the day this is a Captain America film and I find it highly unlikely they want audience sympathies stacked squarely against him.

As a hypothetical, the concept of "accountability for super beings" is desirable, without going into the absurdity of attempting to figure out how that would work on a nuts and bolts level. In the actual film, I suspect the plan they're presented with is going to be deeply problematic on at least one level. They've already laid the ground work for that in Winter Soldier.
 

Cicada 5

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2015
3,140
1,711
118
Country
Nigeria
Im Lang said:
Agent_Z said:
Im Lang said:
Agent_Z said:
Saltyk said:
The thing is that the MCU movies has always made it a big deal that they try to prevent casualties. It's not like they were Man of Steeling it and hoping people could survive two super powered beings ramming through their living room at the speed of sound. In Avengers 2, we see Tony send the Iron Legion in to protect the people in a local village, for example. In Avengers, they were making an effort to keep the fighting contained and making the effort to protect civilian populations, like when Cap went to protect that diner.

I won't say that I think those numbers are realistic, but in universe it makes sense that the casualties aren't absolutely catastrophic.
That's just it. The idea that casualties are this low is too straining on suspension of disbelief. Showing a higher body count won't make these people less herois, just show they have limits.
Limits they don't really have. Limits that only exist for the sake of telling a story, instead of a 2 minute confrontation and then the end credits. Comics are fun, cheap theater. If you're looking for something that's internally consistent, this was never the medium.

It's simple isn't it? If their regular activities led to a few megadeaths, it would be a completely different story. Since these are comic books, there is no more justification needed, any more than there is to bring a character back from the grave.
Superhero comics have changed a lot from what they were like in the 40s, 50s, 60s, 80 etc. And clearly, it's not just a few deaths considering the plot of Civil War. Saying "it's fiction, ignore it" isn't a valid excuse. I might as well be watching Looney Tunes.
I said, "They're COMIC BOOKS" ignore it. Not "It's fiction". Biiiiiiiiiiig difference. "Fiction" includes Hemingway. "Comic Books" do not.
"It's comic books" isn't much of an excuse either.
 

Silentpony_v1legacy

Alleged Feather-Rustler
Jun 5, 2013
6,760
0
0
Compared to fan theories that like four hundred thousand billion people died in the Superman/Zod fight, I'd say this balances it out well enough.

And to be fair, the aliens and RoboCop were comically(no pun intended) stupid and bad at their jobs. I mean the Avengers tried to control the New York Invasion, and the aliens, who have technology thousands of years more advanced than ours, totally let them. Imagine today's American Marines letting the ancient Romans direct and control a battle in ancient Rome. Not likely.

And Big-O? Come on, ONE town?! Get like 4. From all around the world. Different continents. The Avengers are a team, meaning they have to be together. If you divide them once the world ends. Three or more and its overkill.

So am I shocked by like 200 people dying? No, not really. I don't think those 'villains' were capable of doing more than that.