Medieval II Total War Review.

dukethepcdr

New member
May 9, 2008
797
0
0
I like the concept of the Total War series and have tried three different Total War games including the one you reviewed. The biggest gripe I have about it is the camera control. I spend more time trying to see what is going on and trying to get over to the units I need to see in order to command them than I do actually figuring out strategy. I get my butt kicked every map I do because of the clunky camera. If it had a more basic camera like the older RTS games do where you are top down most of the time but can zoom in when you really want to, it would be so much easier. I agree that the system specs are rediculous for an RTS too. That is totally not necessary. I've got RTS games that are 10 yeas old and use 2-D maps with sprites yet they are still more fun to play than this game.
 

Morderkaine

New member
Dec 23, 2007
132
0
0
I must disagree with your review (but I love the screenshot, I didnt know you could look at your units with that much detail). I have played the game many times, its one of the few I often fall back on to play. I will admit, sometimes the computer will be rather stupid and let itself be picked apart by archers, but those times are few. Often it does a decent enough job of moving its troops that you actually have to think and react properly to combat it. I am nearly always a better general than the computer, but I have to work hard at it and I like that,
My main reason for loving the game is the realism built into it - and if you read gamespot reviews it definately gets the 'Oh, Snap!" award - when something happens where it just stuns you. My favorite two occurences are thus...
1: Im up on a hill defending and the enemy king is leading his army against me. I have a few capatpults defending against his 800 or so guys. Ive maybe killed the first 8 and I decide to watch a catapult boulder during its flight. It lands square in the middle of the royal knights leading the charge against me and I get the message "The enemy king has been slain in battle!" I laughed my ass off - and its great that you have a chance, albiet small, to pick off a certain guy in the middle of a unit.
2: I was the english and the french were my main target as I had to get through them to gain more land. I was constantly excomminicated for attacking a fellow christian faction. So I got pissed off at being excomminicated and my happiness going down that I landed a huge army on the papal states and took them over - and got the message that I removed the pope and put a puppet pope on the throne. That was just awesome and let me get away with a ton of stuff - but I had to guard against them trying to take it back every few turns.
Other great stuff is the moral value - troops run when flanked or losing too badly and it really makes you have to plan and think a lot more. I was seriously out-numbered in a battle and even though I was winning my troops ran because the enemy kept on coming in more and more waves. Morale and troops fleeing overwhelming numbers was a serious concern back in the day, and even in mordern warfare, so adding that to game does really increase the realism. Their goal in making the game seems to have been realism, and they hit it head on.
 

Vic Sage

New member
Aug 6, 2008
56
0
0
tis an awesome game, its the only game ive replayed about 10 times without getting bored of it other than CoD4, its has to be one of the best, if not THE best, rts/tbs games on the pc for a long time, the scottish campiaign is difficult, but rewarding if you enjoy seeing britain trampled underfoot :D