TheArcaneThinker said:
Why isnt there a study that doesnt involve casual games , facebook games....
Because such a study couldn't be used as an "argument" why the AAA industry should stop revolving about the wast majority of their consumer base and start revolving about people that aren't their consumer base.
Honestly, I'm getting sick of this argument. Every time someone brings up the male to female ration gaming, I know it will lead to someone having a snarky comment to some AAA publisher telling them how they are woring and should start focusing on female players as much as male players. Now, don't get me wrong. I have nothing against big publisher pandering to anyone. If they want to do it, they can do it. I don't care. After all I'm not the targeted audience for the wast majority of the games since "widening the audience" has become a big thing.
But I hate those false arguments.
People are making a separation of the casual and core argument for a reason and it's not "because they don't want to share their games with others". It's because the markets for those 2 groups is vastly different and pandering to the other market means
destroying my fun and I don't want that. They have their own developer, let those developer make games for them. I've lost the FPS market because casuals can't into fast paced FPS games. I've lost the RTS games because every game has to be a billion seller. I've lost the RPG market because people can't into reading and need quest marker, voice acting, overcasualized stats systems, magic, combat, world layout and everything else.
So yeah, sorry if it hurts someone that I don't want the things I like to get fucked up just so that he or she can enjoy it. Actually, I'm not sorry. Fuck them. Anyone who actually loved Morrowind will tell you what piece of shit Skyrim is. Everyone who loved Thief will tell you what piece of shit the new Thief is. I don't want to see more things I enjoy getting ruined just to pander to someone who actually doesn't really care about the game.
EDIT: