But nowhere will you find a court of law willing to say that two people sharing completely identical DNA (twins) are the same person and should be treated as such for legal purposes. Hypothetically, if you had a twin brother with identical DNA to your own, would you trust him with complete power of attorney over all of your assets? Would you trust a court or government that treated you and your twin as one single entity?oliveira8 said:They the same person DNA wise. They might be different on personality and other technicalities but they all share the same DNA code. Tho all of 3 of them werew changed geneticly.
A single human being. That is what "a person" means.
They are not the same person by any understanding of the term. They would identical siblings at best, but as their genes are clearly no longer identical (thanks to tampering) then neither are they. Would you consider yourself the same person as your father and mother just because you share portions of the same genetic code? (After all, they're imperfect copies of each other and their father. The same goes for any human with their parents: genetically imperfect copies.)
I suspect the use of a "sci-fi" term like "clone" is obscuring the genetic realities of the situation, here.