Michael Atkinson Steps Back From Pre-Election Net Censorship

Flying Dagger

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,344
0
0
Lullabye said:
Flying Dagger said:
I think that a removal of anonymity could be a good thing, but this isn't the way to go about it.
Agreed. Though, it will only work in a place where you won't be reprimanded for posting an opinion other than that approved by the government.(for example, here in Canada it should be quite safe, however in China.....)
Definitely, but in places where people use anonymity to bully, troll or flame it could be take away their cover leaving them open to the guns of public knowledge.

i think i may have pushed that metaphor too far. gotta stop playing shooters.
 

ReverseEngineered

Raving Lunatic
Apr 30, 2008
444
0
0
It makes me sad that he still doesn't get it. He thinks people are just ganging up on him because they hate him, or that they want to make a spectacle out of him. The truth is, people honestly don't like his policies.

I'm not sure what Australia's constitution looks like, but in most first-world nations, freedom of speech prevails. You don't have to identify yourself to the government in order to speak and you can't be imprisoned for stating your opinion just because it runs counter to what the government would prefer. In fact, it's been a common theme throughout history to write under a pseudonym to avoid persecution for your beliefs, and Atkinson's reactionary law-making is a good example of why such anonymous discourse is important.

It's clear that Atkinson used his position as attorney-general to silence people who opposed him. I can't think of a greater abuse of power in a democracy. He owes the Australian people more than an apology -- he should be tendering his resignation.
 

Brett Alex

New member
Jul 22, 2008
1,397
0
0
ReverseEngineered said:
I'm not sure what Australia's constitution looks like, but in most first-world nations, freedom of speech prevails.
Yeah... funny story: we kinda left the free speech part out when we were drafting our constitution. I guess it just didn't seem important 110 odd years ago.

Sadly no joke, there is no provision for guaranteed freedom of speech in the Australian constitution.
 

Skratt

New member
Dec 20, 2008
824
0
0
He really does have a lot of similarities to Jack Thompson. Are they brothers or cousins or something?

You know us gamers. We're more dangerous than murderous drug dealing ***** slapping biker gangs. We might post anonymously against a politician and then it would be total anarchy in the streets.
 

Skratt

New member
Dec 20, 2008
824
0
0
Armitage Shanks said:
ReverseEngineered said:
I'm not sure what Australia's constitution looks like, but in most first-world nations, freedom of speech prevails.
Yeah... funny story: we kinda left the free speech part out when we were drafting our constitution. I guess it just didn't seem important 110 odd years ago.

Sadly no joke, there is no provision for guaranteed freedom of speech in the Australian constitution.
Sadly, the ones in power at the time wanted to make sure they could stay that way. Which is really where democracy can break down if you elect people that "know best" they tend to lean towards tyranny and everybody wonders why.
 

RelexCryo

New member
Oct 21, 2008
1,414
0
0
Skratt said:
Armitage Shanks said:
ReverseEngineered said:
I'm not sure what Australia's constitution looks like, but in most first-world nations, freedom of speech prevails.
Yeah... funny story: we kinda left the free speech part out when we were drafting our constitution. I guess it just didn't seem important 110 odd years ago.

Sadly no joke, there is no provision for guaranteed freedom of speech in the Australian constitution.
Sadly, the ones in power at the time wanted to make sure they could stay that way. Which is really where democracy can break down if you elect people that "know best" they tend to lean towards tyranny and everybody wonders why.
This is why some civilians want to own assault rifles.
 

Skratt

New member
Dec 20, 2008
824
0
0
RelexCryo said:
Skratt said:
Armitage Shanks said:
ReverseEngineered said:
I'm not sure what Australia's constitution looks like, but in most first-world nations, freedom of speech prevails.
Yeah... funny story: we kinda left the free speech part out when we were drafting our constitution. I guess it just didn't seem important 110 odd years ago.

Sadly no joke, there is no provision for guaranteed freedom of speech in the Australian constitution.
Sadly, the ones in power at the time wanted to make sure they could stay that way. Which is really where democracy can break down if you elect people that "know best" they tend to lean towards tyranny and everybody wonders why.
This is why some civilians want to own assault rifles.
If I didn't have to fill out all that pesky paperwork, I would so become an assault rifle owner. But, if that gun is ever used in a crime (as in it was stolen) you get in a WHOLE lot of trouble. At least I understand it to be the case.