Microsoft Accidentally Identifies Chrome As "Severe Threat"

KarlMonster

New member
Mar 10, 2009
393
0
0
No, MS *claims* that a mere 3000 people were affected. I'd be surprised if they can determine the actual number.

If MS really wanted to be complete bastards, they could automatically target Yahoo! or Google toolbars. And if anyone complained, MS could just say it was mistaken for spyware - which might happen to be true.
 

RemuValtrez

New member
Sep 14, 2011
168
0
0
Well now I'm sort of glad I refused to get Chrome. Would have just went back to using firefox after this messup anyways.
 

Reynaert

New member
Jan 30, 2011
134
0
0
The quotes in the title are misplaced.
It should be: Microsoft "Accidentally" Identifies Chrome As Severe Threat
 

Aeshi

New member
Dec 22, 2009
2,640
0
0
AgentBJ09 said:
Z-bot Virus
Summary:
This type of trojan secretly installs spy programs and/or keylogger programs.

I honestly don't blame Windows Anti-Malware programs for picking up Chrome for something similar to this. Who's to say Google isn't doing that when their search engine is basically a log of everything you type into it, to the point where it tailors the ads to you if you use it long enough.
This is what I was thinking, thought maybe MS should confront Google on that rather than just deleting a browser that will most likely be reinstalled within a minute or two of being deleted.
 

Saviordd1

New member
Jan 2, 2011
2,455
0
0
Honestly this was handled professionally and quickly so I don't see why everyones complaining, if they wanted to do it on purpose way more then 3000 people (which is pretty small in the long run) would have been affected.
 

Sunfirecross

New member
Oct 17, 2008
39
0
0
Guess what!? I was one of those 3,000 people that had Chrome uninstalled on me. Don't know what it was or why it wouldn't re-install but now I do.
 

AgentBJ09

New member
May 24, 2010
818
0
0
Aeshi said:
This is what I was thinking, thought maybe MS should confront Google on that rather than just deleting a browser that will most likely be reinstalled within a minute or two of being deleted.
Yeah. I would also if I was Microsoft. In fact, I would try and deconstruct Chrome and find out if it DOES have these kinds of programs in it's source code.

Generic Gamer said:
Yeah, that or an extension was dodgy and MSE deleted the entire browser rather than the extension since 3000 Chrome users isn't a huge proportion of them.

OT: Oh come on people, Microsoft wouldn't purposefully do this, how dumb do you have to be to think this is a viable tactic for them?
Indeed not, however people thinking this is a viable business tactic from Microsoft doesn't shock me either. A lot of gamers, especially here, really detest Microsoft, so when they get the chance to bash them for anything that sounds bad, they leap at the chance.

Anything to make them feel good, even though they likely didn't consider the possibility that something of this nature could be true. If Chrome was tagged for this kind of thing, and the browser was deleted in response, why not investigate the idea of a keylogger or built-in spyware instead of writing off Microsoft as the Big Bad Wolf trying to take down the three Little Pigs of Internet browsers?
 

Smerf

New member
May 4, 2011
177
0
0
if you dont use microsoft, you dont have to worry about them screwing up (go linux)
 

Formica Archonis

Anonymous Source
Nov 13, 2009
2,312
0
0
Happens in the industry. Not as vile a sin as the time McAfee [http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/mcafee-update-breaks-windows-xp-systems-6594] decided the Windows service host (a critical part of Windows) was a threat and deleted that! When three BSODs-on-boot came in to my shop in as many hours, I got rather suspicious!
 

Prof. Monkeypox

New member
Mar 17, 2010
1,014
0
0
I've always though google was kind of an evil corporation...

Maybe the security scan saw something we didn't and was genuinely removing something horrible. Oh, god! We've inadvertently removed the one line of defense we had against google sleeper agent programs!


(jk)
 

Ruwrak

New member
Sep 15, 2009
845
0
0
SO this is the new way to make us use Internet explorer 8 huh?

Formica Archonis said:
Happens in the industry. Not as vile a sin as the time McAfee [http://www.eweekeurope.co.uk/news/mcafee-update-breaks-windows-xp-systems-6594] decided the Windows service host (a critical part of Windows) was a threat and deleted that! When three BSODs-on-boot came in to my shop in as many hours, I got rather suspicious!
Actually... I think that happened to me once. How else would one lose a win32.sys registry file when one is 14 years old and -NOT- doing clicky click in the registers? :p
 

ckam

Make America Great For Who?
Oct 8, 2008
1,618
0
0
If I was using Chrome I would have said, "No! My bookmarks!"
 

Jaime_Wolf

New member
Jul 17, 2009
1,194
0
0
I am sure I am not the only person who finds this slightly suspicious. I'm usually not a fan of crazy conspiracy theories, but how often does the signature file accidentally block a program as popular as Chrome? And it just so happens that the one time it does this, it blocks probably the biggest competitor to one of Microsoft's products - a product that has regularly been the target of questionable business practices?
 

OriginalLadders

New member
Sep 29, 2011
235
0
0
Jaime_Wolf said:
I am sure I am not the only person who finds this slightly suspicious. I'm usually not a fan of crazy conspiracy theories, but how often does the signature file accidentally block a program as popular as Chrome? And it just so happens that the one time it does this, it blocks probably the biggest competitor to one of Microsoft's products - a product that has regularly been the target of questionable business practices?
What? You mean that a Microsoft programme removing a programme made by Microsoft's rivals from people's machines might not have been an accident? Perish the thought!

...

As a Linux fanboy user, I may be a little biased here.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Shame to be a minority. But yes, I find Google to be quite threatening in every aspect of google. Shame it was unintentional because Google is hazardous to the health of the webberverse imho.
 

SteakHeart

New member
Jul 20, 2009
15,098
0
0
Well, Chrome is a major threat to intelligence.

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

But seriously, that's a pretty embarassing mistake.