I thought that was implicit. The statement I quoted was about the "consumer" which on average spends/plays/cares more about AAA titles, which is why I don't agree with what was said in general.TiberiusEsuriens said:-snip-
I thought that was implicit. The statement I quoted was about the "consumer" which on average spends/plays/cares more about AAA titles, which is why I don't agree with what was said in general.TiberiusEsuriens said:-snip-
At the same time though, they are only doing this near the end of the generation when games made for 360 are winding down and less money can be made.thethird0611 said:I would love to re-use and slightly change an old phrase to fit this news...
"Microsoft could find the cure to Cancer, Diabetes, and AID's, and people would still hate on them"
Seriously, can we fucking give them some damn credit? They are cutting what is most likely a VERY profitable policy (because of AAA games), and flushing it down to help out the indies.
X1 gets the DRM dropped? PARANOIA, THEY ARE GOING TO PUT IT BACK IN.
Patching fee dropped? BAD PR, MS HATES INDIES, MS NEVER DOES GOOD.
Sorry, little bit of frustration from people who cant actually calm down for to read 1 good bit of news.
See, I can agree with you on both points, they are actual level headed criticisms, that's just unlike most MS criticisms on the Escapist. People on this site just get way to into group think and need to calm down and use some level headed thinking.Diablo1099 said:At the same time though, they are only doing this near the end of the generation when games made for 360 are winding down and less money can be made.thethird0611 said:I would love to re-use and slightly change an old phrase to fit this news...
"Microsoft could find the cure to Cancer, Diabetes, and AID's, and people would still hate on them"
Seriously, can we fucking give them some damn credit? They are cutting what is most likely a VERY profitable policy (because of AAA games), and flushing it down to help out the indies.
X1 gets the DRM dropped? PARANOIA, THEY ARE GOING TO PUT IT BACK IN.
Patching fee dropped? BAD PR, MS HATES INDIES, MS NEVER DOES GOOD.
Sorry, little bit of frustration from people who cant actually calm down for to read 1 good bit of news.
Also, I'm uncertain if this will carry over to the Indies on Xbone.
While I'll give you the DRM thing, MS still loaded a gun, pointed it at consumers and threatened to fire it.[footnote]Heavy Handed Analogy, I know[/footnote]
While they didn't fire, which is nice, the fact is that they were going to is a red flag and makes it a tad bit harder to trust anything that they do.
I Agree with you there, but this *IS* the Internet.thethird0611 said:See, I can agree with you on both points, they are actual level headed criticisms, that's just unlike most MS criticisms on the Escapist. People on this site just get way to into group think and need to calm down and use some level headed thinking.
But yeah, I'm hoping that it carries over to the X1, especially with Sony doing its best to court developers. The more platforms a small title can get onto, the bigger profits it can make.
That Right there? That Bias, That Hate? That's the damage that Microsoft has done to its own Brand, just like EA during Sim City.Now your second point, I once again agree with you, and I am still currently watching Microsoft's actions, but there are people who are just saying "Oh, they are going to re-implement it a year in" with no evidence, just because they have this horrid bias and hate.
So yeah, I just get frustrated with a lot of what I read, just because people cant actually be non-bias and constantly get up into the trend of hating.
He, ze good ol Internet.Diablo1099 said:I Agree with you there, but this *IS* the Internet.thethird0611 said:See, I can agree with you on both points, they are actual level headed criticisms, that's just unlike most MS criticisms on the Escapist. People on this site just get way to into group think and need to calm down and use some level headed thinking.
But yeah, I'm hoping that it carries over to the X1, especially with Sony doing its best to court developers. The more platforms a small title can get onto, the bigger profits it can make.
Might as well blame the sky for being blue
/jk
That Right there? That Bias, That Hate? That's the damage that Microsoft has done to its own Brand, just like EA during Sim City.Now your second point, I once again agree with you, and I am still currently watching Microsoft's actions, but there are people who are just saying "Oh, they are going to re-implement it a year in" with no evidence, just because they have this horrid bias and hate.
So yeah, I just get frustrated with a lot of what I read, just because people cant actually be non-bias and constantly get up into the trend of hating.
They've pissed off so many people that Sorry ain't cutting it.
You might get sick of it, but keep in mind that they, for the most part, brought it on themselves.
...The hat simulator is a dangerous thing to dabble in. One moment, you're just happy to have a bowler hat on your scout. The next moment, you have a backpack worth $40,000 and you don't even know where the time went.Mumorpuger said:I want in on this hat shenanigans I've been hearing so much about...Necrofudge said:I was thinking of the exact same thing. I doubt I'd want Valve to do that anymore, though. It would just waste time better spent fine tuning the already burgeoning PC tf2 community.Mumorpuger said:Ooo, can we have Valve update TF2 and The Orange Box? That'd be incredible.
There is a difference alright, but in the end it has the same effect and just shows that MS pissed off a LOT of people.thethird0611 said:He, ze good ol Internet.
Now that is very true, but I think there is a difference between someone saying...
"Sorry Microsoft, your shot yourself in the foot on this one, your going to have to regain my trust"
Than someone saying...
"No one should buy an X1, it has NOTHING good, they are going to re implement the DRM, they are going to spy on your with the Kinect, the games suck, your a fanboy/dudebro if you buy one, and Microsoft will never ever make anything else good"
At least I see a difference. Meh.
when a child runs up claiming to have a 'amazing surprise' which turns out to be a dog turd, most people will be a little wary of any other 'surprises' even when the child swears black and blue that it's different this time.thethird0611 said:I would love to re-use and slightly change an old phrase to fit this news...
"Microsoft could find the cure to Cancer, Diabetes, and AID's, and people would still hate on them"
Seriously, can we fucking give them some damn credit? They are cutting what is most likely a VERY profitable policy (because of AAA games), and flushing it down to help out the indies.
X1 gets the DRM dropped? PARANOIA, THEY ARE GOING TO PUT IT BACK IN.
Patching fee dropped? BAD PR, MS HATES INDIES, MS NEVER DOES GOOD.
Sorry, little bit of frustration from people who cant actually calm down for to read 1 good bit of news.
josemlopes said:They really dont know anything about PR, do they?Earnest Cavalli said:According to Eurogamer, the firm "made the policy change on the quiet earlier this year," and as of the time of this article's publication, submitting patches to Microsoft does not require a complementary sack of cash.
It is good news but please excuse me for not praising Microsoft because they decided to be less of dicks. Is that really what we as gamers have come too? We must praise a company for not enhancing our gaming experience but for retracting previous draconian policies?thethird0611 said:I would love to re-use and slightly change an old phrase to fit this news...
"Microsoft could find the cure to Cancer, Diabetes, and AID's, and people would still hate on them"
Seriously, can we fucking give them some damn credit? They are cutting what is most likely a VERY profitable policy (because of AAA games), and flushing it down to help out the indies.
X1 gets the DRM dropped? PARANOIA, THEY ARE GOING TO PUT IT BACK IN.
Patching fee dropped? BAD PR, MS HATES INDIES, MS NEVER DOES GOOD.
Sorry, little bit of frustration from people who cant actually calm down for to read 1 good bit of news.
SO no daily patches to fix the latest bugs thus maknig your experience better, only free patch after you already finished the game?Earnest Cavalli said:Microsoft does reserve the right to charge any developers that it deems to be abusing the system with an overlarge number of updates, but that caveat seems like a legitimate safeguard against abuse than any real effort on Microsoft's part to generate an additional revenue stream for the wealthy-as-god computing giant.
no amount of testing can find everything. people find flaws in games 3 years after their release. i agree that the game shoudl work (no gmaebreaking bugs) and the less annoying bugs the better, but the complexity of agames nowadays mean 0 bugsi s pretty much impossible. all it does is make us not able to get them fixed.ecoho said:I for one had no problem with the fee, it got developers to get it right the first time rather then selling a broken game and patching it later. As for indie titles not having the money to pay the fee, well the fee should scale on how successful the developer and the game are but they should not be given special treatment because they have less money, there is no excuse for shipping a broken game.