Microsoft to release tool to make griefing easier!

Recommended Videos

Cabisco

New member
May 7, 2009
2,433
0
0
Ickorus said:
Firstly on an unrelated matter you made me paw at my screen like a cat because of your damned avatar!

And looking at my current reputation on Xbox live I believe it's something close to 80% of people avoided me compared to only 20% said nice things or nothing. It looks damned likely i'm going to troll hell with that kind of record but to be honest nearly all my friends have similar scores. Apart from the terrible ones... it actually seems the better you are the more you're avoided :p
 

PoolCleaningRobot

New member
Mar 18, 2012
1,237
0
0
If they want a system that works, they'll have to use moderators but that would be too expensive to implement over all of xbox live so in my opinion there's nothing they can do about their service's shitty reputation. From another article about this I'm under the impression Microsoft is only doing this because xbox live is know for having 12 year olds screaming obscenities at people and they want a more "family friendly" image. I doubt they care if this system will work. I think matches work better when, depending on the size the match, there's one or more "hosts" or moderators who ultimately have the power to kick or block people from a game but even then its hard to implament. I don't see a lot of value in a long term reputation system
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,131
4,817
118
kingthrall said:
PREPARE YOURSELF MORTARS TO SERVE MY MASTER FOR ETERNITY (insert diablo 3 skeleton king voice here)

Really, I am going to enjoy all these threads soon, while I sit back with my pc and laugh at this.

I find it Ironic that you can almost pick the types of haters deeper in this image provided that will be cast down into the hell. With the racists ect at the deepest end and the Hackers being the gluttons ect.

Hey, I can see my house from here!
 

doomed89

New member
May 5, 2009
188
0
0
Random monitoring is the only effective system for something like this I think. And before anyone goes off on privacy crap and what not we are talking about conversations you are having with strangers over the internet.
 

Darkbladex96

New member
Jan 25, 2011
76
0
0
But what did he do wrong? Now banning players for not makimg cookie cutter builds of popular ov erused, and possibly played out games styles is a bannable offense? Are you saying that its fair for the community to have its head so far up its ass that they can get me banned for having a suboptimal build if so so... LoL is the only game that deserves to die.

Jandau said:
5ilver said:
Jandau said:
Reputation systems only work if there is considerable oversight and a number of failsafes. For instance, LoL has a solid system in the Tribunal (not perfect, but robust and solid), where players report others, then once a sufficient number of reports has been accrued that player is forwarded to the Tribunal. There, other players get to review cases at random, each case consisting of stats and chat logs for a number of games that player participated in. Finally, if enough players decide that the accused deserves punishment, it is then forwarded to a moderator who makes the final call.
The moderators make the final call in only the cases that involve a perm ban. In all other instances- it's entirely automated.
And to give an alternate opinion on The League Tribunal- it is absolutely the worst rep system I've ever seen or been a part of. You can get suspended for days or even weeks without even breaking a single rule. To give an example: A person recently got banned because he was playing Mordekaiser as a jungler.
More info: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=35658688
Except he wasn't. In that particular game, he played an unconventional build of a not-too-great champion for the first time (his own words) in a Ranked game. I can totally understand why his team was less than thrilled. Also, you don't get banned for one game. Ever. You can't. You had to have been reported by multiple people for a number of games. I've done a decent number of Tribunal cases and I've never seen a case with less than 4 games that that person was reported for, usually, 6-7 games were listed.

People are naturally butthurt when they get a suspension, and they tend to cry about it, saying that it was just one game. It wasn't. It never is. To even show up in front of the Tribunal you had to have been reported over and over again.
 

doomed89

New member
May 5, 2009
188
0
0
Darkbladex96 said:
But what did he do wrong? Now banning players for not makimg cookie cutter builds of popular ov erused, and possibly played out games styles is a bannable offense? Are you saying that its fair for the community to have its head so far up its ass that they can get me banned for having a suboptimal build if so so... LoL is the only game that deserves to die.
Yeah that's a pretty horrible system, I mean kick him out of the clan whatever if he sucks fine but to suspend him for the actual game is ridicules.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,313
0
0
Darkbladex96 said:
But what did he do wrong?
Basically lost intentionally in ranked? There are builds that are unorthodox but work, but most of the things people get in trouble for just do not work. Ranked is for people playing to win, if you wan't to dick around with derpy builds, do it in normals, or better yet bots.
 

Godhead

Dib dib dib, dob dob dob.
May 25, 2009
1,692
0
0
This seems really similar to what Valve did with DOTA 2. Course that really only reinforced bad behavior and was really hard to get out of there once you got in there.
 

Generic4me

New member
Oct 10, 2012
116
0
0
The system can't possibly work, it's fundamentally flawed. Every time I join a match I mute everybody in the match, because I don't like listening to morons spewing bullshit.

So I'm automatically in the lowest layer simply because I muted everybody, because the system compensates. And I'll forever be in the lowest layer because I'll have to mute all the stupid douchebags whom are in that lowest layer with me, further cementing me in that lowest layer.
 

Micalas

New member
Mar 5, 2011
793
0
0
Edit: To those comparing this to tribunal in LoL, you are very much wrong. What Microsoft is proposing is a Prisoner's Island system, something that player behavior team of Riot has said they will never institute because it doesn't nothing to reform behavior. It causes a spiral effect where you get with worse and worse people until you hit the bottom.

5ilver said:
Jandau said:
Reputation systems only work if there is considerable oversight and a number of failsafes. For instance, LoL has a solid system in the Tribunal (not perfect, but robust and solid), where players report others, then once a sufficient number of reports has been accrued that player is forwarded to the Tribunal. There, other players get to review cases at random, each case consisting of stats and chat logs for a number of games that player participated in. Finally, if enough players decide that the accused deserves punishment, it is then forwarded to a moderator who makes the final call.
The moderators make the final call in only the cases that involve a perm ban. In all other instances- it's entirely automated.
And to give an alternate opinion on The League Tribunal- it is absolutely the worst rep system I've ever seen or been a part of. You can get suspended for days or even weeks without even breaking a single rule. To give an example: A person recently got banned because he was playing Mordekaiser as a jungler.
More info: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=35658688
I say it on the LoL forums all the time and I'll say it here. I have almost 2k games played and I've never even been suspended. Contrary to popular belief, it's pretty easy to not be a dickhead in game.
 

thethird0611

New member
Feb 19, 2011
411
0
0
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/125633-Xbox-Ones-Reputation-System-Locks-Harassers-Into-Their-Own-Hell

Let me just go ahead and post that, and post what many people in there have said...

IT

IS

NOT

AUTOMATED.

You only get sent down a level when an Xbox Mod sees you do bad shit in game, then THEY can send you down, not an automated system which can griefed.
 

snakeinthereeds

New member
Jun 22, 2013
12
0
0
Huh, looks like it might be pretty nice if it's properly looked after. There are some failsafes, but just how functional are they going to be everyone will be finding out once they're seen in action, or not.

doomed89 said:
Yeah that's a pretty horrible system, I mean kick him out of the clan whatever if he sucks fine but to suspend him for the actual game is ridicules.
He was actually suspended from the game for that? Just how significant to the fate of the world are these ranked matches exactly?
 

Gennadios

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,156
0
0
5ilver said:
And to give an alternate opinion on The League Tribunal- it is absolutely the worst rep system I've ever seen or been a part of. You can get suspended for days or even weeks without even breaking a single rule. To give an example: A person recently got banned because he was playing Mordekaiser as a jungler.
More info: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=35658688
It wasn't that cut and dry, that person racked up weeks of complaints and wasn't a particularly communicative player. An example of the kind of player people don't like to play with. It's not really unfair to have him 'test' his builds in the low rep ghetto.

Personally, I think it's about time to start rep systems, or at least test them out. Too many 12 year olds in games now adays, and it's not like you can just flash an ID and set up a 30-something game with ease.

I'm just glad it's coming to the XBone first, I don't do Microsoft, so they can get the ball rolling and more competent people will take their place.
 

Darkbladex96

New member
Jan 25, 2011
76
0
0
major_chaos said:
Darkbladex96 said:
But what did he do wrong?
Basically lost intentionally in ranked? There are builds that are unorthodox but work, but most of the things people get in trouble for just do not work. Ranked is for people playing to win, if you wan't to dick around with derpy builds, do it in normals, or better yet bots.
Oh, so its in the rules not to play around in ranked with quarky builds in ranked? If not there should be no problem, otherwise these play to win people should be partied up. They take their own risk playing a game of stakes with randoms. You should never punish players for exploring gameplay options. Game mode is irrelevant.

Unless the game checks for some prerequisite before match making a build should not ne grounds for ban. Ever. Unless said build is illegal.WHat happened was just an examplepeople being dicks. Nothing more.

At most those players that dont like his build should be able to avoid him. But to lose your right to play the game because some asshats dont like how you play is the worst system ever.

What next? Banning people for suboptimal hotkey placements? Banning because you dont like someones macros.

"Hes green we dont like him..."

If he plays ranked the only performance that matters is ranked.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Soopy said:
When I read the title, I thought it might be a cynical reference to the departure of Don Mattrick, to Zynga...
XD

Ickorus said:
The fail safes they have in place sound logical and the system could work
Their failsafes are vague promises at this point.

thethird0611 said:
IT

IS

NOT
It is not automatic. From all appearances, it is largely automated. The use of "automatic" here appears to apply to the concept of you getting a one time grief bomb.

If you're going to scream at people, try and make sure you've got the information right.
 

doomed89

New member
May 5, 2009
188
0
0
major_chaos said:
He was actually suspended from the game for that? Just how significant to the fate of the world are these ranked matches exactly?
I don't know all the information I got on it was in this thread and the link but it sounds like the players are just dicks to anyone who doesn't play the way they do. Something similar happened to me in a game called gunz everyone had this style where the block doge and shoot in one motion because of a cool glitch that made the game unique so the devs started building the game around that, meanwhile I just aimed and killed them doing the gun dodge instead of the sword one and pissed them off lol, good thing there was no rating system in there or else I would of had a low one. I also used a machine gun to compensate for lag and was called a sprayer lol. But yeah player rating systems never work, the only thing that works if an admin having a brain and seeing/hearing it, so video/audio recordings.

Hey that's what they need to do. Let players start an audio/video recording that goes straight to the mods for review with all relevant information. That system would work great, and players who waste the mods time can just have that ability taken away.
 

Bad Jim

New member
Nov 1, 2010
1,763
0
0
Gennadios said:
5ilver said:
And to give an alternate opinion on The League Tribunal- it is absolutely the worst rep system I've ever seen or been a part of. You can get suspended for days or even weeks without even breaking a single rule. To give an example: A person recently got banned because he was playing Mordekaiser as a jungler.
More info: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=35658688
It wasn't that cut and dry, that person racked up weeks of complaints and wasn't a particularly communicative player. An example of the kind of player people don't like to play with. It's not really unfair to have him 'test' his builds in the low rep ghetto.
Surely there's a better system to punish people who screw around in ranked play. Some sort of ranking system that drops them into lower leagues if their eccentricity repeatedly loses games.

http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=35659021

Oh wait. It seems he can never drop leagues due to bad play. I dare say a lot of ill feeling could be avoided if bad players were brought back down into the leagues they deserved. Being a team game it is quite possible to get promoted through luck, since you could just get better teammates several times in a row, or the games could just work out better. So why is there no system that can pull bad players back down?

Another idea - instead of bad repping players for fruity builds, players could give them a score multiplier. If they're just trolling, they'll plummet in the rankings, but if their choices are legit, they'll be about as likely to go up as down.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,313
0
0
Darkbladex96 said:
otherwise these play to win people should be partied up.
They were, its called queing up for a ranked match. The entire point of ranked is to play more seriously. The place for screwing around is normals, not ranked where if you make me lose it dings my LP.
 

TheCommanders

ohmygodimonfire
Nov 30, 2011
589
0
0
What seems really strange about this to me is the fact that being muted hurts you. I often blanket mute entire lobbies, depending on the game. It's nothing against most of the people there, but if I'm not talking (don't have a mic hooked up) I don't need people yelling at me while I'm unable to respond. Seems a strange thing for them to mark people down for.
 

Jandau

Smug Platypus
Dec 19, 2008
5,030
0
0
Darkbladex96 said:
But what did he do wrong? Now banning players for not makimg cookie cutter builds of popular ov erused, and possibly played out games styles is a bannable offense? Are you saying that its fair for the community to have its head so far up its ass that they can get me banned for having a suboptimal build if so so... LoL is the only game that deserves to die.
What did he do wrong? We don't know. That's one of the points I was making in my post - he only posted about that one game, and you can't wind up in front of the Tribunal for one game. You can't. It doesn't happen. You have to have been reported in multiple games by multiple people for it to even have a chance of winding up before a Tribunal. However, when people get suspended or banned, they tend to drudge up one game where they did something wrong and point to it saying "I was banned for THIS????". No, you weren't, you were banned for consistently being a dick over a longer period of time.

As for that one game and the question of non-cookie cutter builds - it's not, as you put it, about a community with its head so far up its arse. First of all, this was a Ranked game. In case you aren't a LoL player, Ranked games are the tryhard section of the game. This is where people are expected to bring their A-game. Sure, unconventional picks are a thing, but players picking unconventional stuff are expected to be proficient with it. If you want to practice, you go and play Normal games or Bot games. There are plenty of platforms for you to perfect something you want to play, but if you take it to Ranked, then know what you're doing.

But the player in question picked Mordekaiser. Now, Morde is at the moment not the best champion, but a valid pick. However, he is picked as a solo laner, NOT as a Jungler. In fact, he is objectively an inferior Jungler. It's not a matter of there being two or three champs for each role that are considered valid picks, it's about him ignoring a few DOZEN champs that are suited for the role and picking one guy who kinda sucks at it.

But it's not just that - he then declares it's his first time playing that champion in that role. So he's playing a champion unsuited to the role for the first time, which means he likely doesn't know what he's doing. He's intentionally screwing four other people over, some of which might be counting on that particular game for a promotion to a higher league. So yes, people were upset.

If you don't want people taking the game seriously, if you want to play for fun and/or fool around, go for it, that's what Normal games are for. If you play Ranked, then don't fuck around and waste people's time.