its pretty obvious why. The launch titles are pretty bad. Once the actual nintendo titles come out in June, it will be flying off the shelves. In other words, get it now before you can't when the games come out.
It's a $100 gimmick, and no one in the mainstream world has been able to test it out. Not sending demo units to every store they could manage has made this a marketing problem from the start.Chris Plante said:Midnight 3DS Launch Underwhelms in New York
Nintendo's midnight launch of the 3DS went nearly unnoticed by the New York public.
Read Full Article
Of course I get the gist of your opinion and I agree, but I feel obligated to point out that the 3DS has all the things you just listed, though we're not aware of the specs of the browser and the digital camera is a pretty low quality 3d camera.Xanthious said:Portable consoles are just a tough sell now. Why would someone want to buy a device dedicated to just gaming when they could have a device that does gaming, and mp3s, and doubles as a digital camera, and offers fully functioning web browser, and so on and so on. Oh, and games on this much more versatile device cost a fraction of what they cost on a portable console.
Wow I don't even know what to say to this. First of all, your definition of a hardcore gamer is my definition of a tech junkie. I think most "hardcore" gamers should look for the best games, not the best hardware. Idk who's been making fun of the system for months or who "has been left with the impression that it is a at best quirky system, that has to be held just right, in perfect conditions, may cause headaches, seizures or blurred vision, may damage small children's eyesight, has next to no battery life, and spies on you at every step you take and reports it all back to Nintendo like a little pocket Judas." Nobody has heard these things (least of all the "crazed gamer community") because half of them are not true, and in case you haven't heard, the 3d can be turned down or off. (and I'm having absolutely no problems maintaining full 3d view for long periods of time) You're using information selectively instead of objectively. Wasn't there an article on this very sight just yesterday that stated that optometrists view on the system was that it was more beneficial than hazardous?....and that it had twice as many preorders as the Wii? And the games are coming very soon. I'm looking forward to a new 3d Mario, Paper Mario, Mario Kart, Phoenix Wright vs Professor Layton, Ocarina of Time 3d, Starfox 3d, possibly all of which are coming this year. Add to that whatever we're gonna be shown at E3, and Nintendo fans have plenty of reason to buy the system and lots to look forward to.faefrost said:The problem is the 3DS is more than a bit schizophrenic about what portion of the "Gamer" niche market it is going for.
The traditional hardcore gamers. Those who do spend more money in exchange for gaming power currently have their attention more focused on SONY's two new offerings. The Xperia Play and the PSP2 (or whatever they are calling it this week) They may buy into the 3DS just because they are rampant gaming consumers. But only if there are several killer games to do so with. This group of consumers long ago learned not to jump on gimmicks. And really doesn't seem to be chomping at the bit for the 3DS. Marketing failed to attract any real buzz here, and even worse the various gaming related webcomics have been making fun of the thing for months. The webcomics have been doing a much better job than Nintendo's marketing to a degree that much of the more crazed gamer community (ie us!) has been left with the impression that it is a at best quirky system, that has to be held just right, in perfect conditions, may cause headaches, seizures or blurred vision, may damage small children's eyesight, has next to no battery life, and spies on you at every step you take and reports it all back to Nintendo like a little pocket Judas. I am guessing that this is not the marketing platform that Nintendo planned on launching with...
So this leaves the die hard true blue Nintendo4Life fans as the launch target audience. You know the ones that have Zelda tattoos (oops, wait no Zelda game yet) or Mario tattoos (nope not here either). Ok, the ones that have Pokemon tattoos (ummmm? Bad news sunshine, they are already playing it on their DS's). Hmmm? So they are targeting the rabid Nintendo loving 3d submarine simulator fan? SteelDiver4Evah?
It's kind of sad seeing Nintendo drop the ball this badly on this one. I know they have had their flops (Virtual Boy anyone?) But they are normally so good at this, and the 3DS started out with so much good word of mouth buzz when it first showed up at CES. It stole the show out from under MS and SONY.
Haha, great jokes. I think the real question is "Why would someone want to buy a device that does shallow games, a poor digital camera, plays MP3s but with bad battery life, a piss-poor web browser, and comes with an expensive monthly bill when what they want is to play great games?" Oh, and those cheaper games for your phone are cheaper because they have so little content, let's not forget that important detail. Smartphones do a lot, but they master none of it. I can get a better game platform. I can get a better digital camera. I can get a better MP3 player. I can get a device with a better web browser (it's called a laptop). Smartphones sacrifice quality for convenience, and while that might be good for just your average joe looking for something to dick around with while he waits in line at the DMV or something, gamers aren't buying them over dedicated gaming machines, photographers aren't buying them over quality cameras, and so on.Xanthious said:The era of handheld consoles is largely over. Mobile gaming on the iPhone and Android OS is more than enough to fill most folks' need for gaming on the go. This is not to say the market is dead, because it isn't. It just become a somewhat of a niche market now relegated to hardcore gamers and children. However, even some hardcore gamers like myself have a hard time justifying spending 250 dollars on a new gaming console when at the same price I could upgrade my phone here in a month and get something like the Xperia Play.
Mobile gaming is evolving at a crazy rate and once where there were only games like solitaire and snake are now games like Infinity Blade and Spectral Souls. And it's only going to keep moving forward. Soon mobile gaming will be much closer than most people would think in terms of offering up similar quality games as the DS and PSP.
Portable consoles are just a tough sell now. Why would someone want to buy a device dedicated to just gaming when they could have a device that does gaming, and mp3s, and doubles as a digital camera, and offers fully functioning web browser, and so on and so on. Oh, and games on this much more versatile device cost a fraction of what they cost on a portable console.
If you can't see what a threat mobile gaming poses to portable consoles like the PSP2 and 3DS you are either blind or in denial. Mobile gaming is the natural evolution of things and will be competing in very big ways against the portable consoles like the 3DS.
Agreed 100%. And considering that the Xperia Play is just a PSP glued to a phone, and I doubt anyone who already has a PSP and games that just like with the PSP Go can't be used on the Xperia Play is looking at the Xperia Play and going "I MUST HAVE THAT SO I CAN BUY ALL OF MY GAMES AGAIN!" after the levels of raw hatred the PSP Go received. If anything, they're just waiting for NGP news.Electrogecko said:Wow I don't even know what to say to this. First of all, your definition of a hardcore gamer is my definition of a tech junkie. I think most "hardcore" gamers should look for the best games, not the best hardware.
You are nitpicking between hardcore gamer and tech junkie. For these purposes the target niche is pretty much the same. Those who will regularly spend a great deal of their disposable income on the latest and greatest games and game gear.Electrogecko said:Of course I get the gist of your opinion and I agree, but I feel obligated to point out that the 3DS has all the things you just listed, though we're not aware of the specs of the browser and the digital camera is a pretty low quality 3d camera.Xanthious said:Portable consoles are just a tough sell now. Why would someone want to buy a device dedicated to just gaming when they could have a device that does gaming, and mp3s, and doubles as a digital camera, and offers fully functioning web browser, and so on and so on. Oh, and games on this much more versatile device cost a fraction of what they cost on a portable console.
Wow I don't even know what to say to this. First of all, your definition of a hardcore gamer is my definition of a tech junkie. I think most "hardcore" gamers should look for the best games, not the best hardware. Idk who's been making fun of the system for months or who "has been left with the impression that it is a at best quirky system, that has to be held just right, in perfect conditions, may cause headaches, seizures or blurred vision, may damage small children's eyesight, has next to no battery life, and spies on you at every step you take and reports it all back to Nintendo like a little pocket Judas." Nobody has heard these things (least of all the "crazed gamer community") because half of them are not true, and in case you haven't heard, the 3d can be turned down or off. (and I'm having absolutely no problems maintaining full 3d view for long periods of time) You're using information selectively instead of objectively. Wasn't there an article on this very sight just yesterday that stated that optometrists view on the system was that it was more beneficial than hazardous?....and that it had twice as many preorders as the Wii? And the games are coming very soon. I'm looking forward to a new 3d Mario, Paper Mario, Mario Kart, Phoenix Wright vs Professor Layton, Ocarina of Time 3d, Starfox 3d, possibly all of which are coming this year. Add to that whatever we're gonna be shown at E3, and Nintendo fans have plenty of reason to buy the system and lots to look forward to.faefrost said:The problem is the 3DS is more than a bit schizophrenic about what portion of the "Gamer" niche market it is going for.
The traditional hardcore gamers. Those who do spend more money in exchange for gaming power currently have their attention more focused on SONY's two new offerings. The Xperia Play and the PSP2 (or whatever they are calling it this week) They may buy into the 3DS just because they are rampant gaming consumers. But only if there are several killer games to do so with. This group of consumers long ago learned not to jump on gimmicks. And really doesn't seem to be chomping at the bit for the 3DS. Marketing failed to attract any real buzz here, and even worse the various gaming related webcomics have been making fun of the thing for months. The webcomics have been doing a much better job than Nintendo's marketing to a degree that much of the more crazed gamer community (ie us!) has been left with the impression that it is a at best quirky system, that has to be held just right, in perfect conditions, may cause headaches, seizures or blurred vision, may damage small children's eyesight, has next to no battery life, and spies on you at every step you take and reports it all back to Nintendo like a little pocket Judas. I am guessing that this is not the marketing platform that Nintendo planned on launching with...
So this leaves the die hard true blue Nintendo4Life fans as the launch target audience. You know the ones that have Zelda tattoos (oops, wait no Zelda game yet) or Mario tattoos (nope not here either). Ok, the ones that have Pokemon tattoos (ummmm? Bad news sunshine, they are already playing it on their DS's). Hmmm? So they are targeting the rabid Nintendo loving 3d submarine simulator fan? SteelDiver4Evah?
It's kind of sad seeing Nintendo drop the ball this badly on this one. I know they have had their flops (Virtual Boy anyone?) But they are normally so good at this, and the 3DS started out with so much good word of mouth buzz when it first showed up at CES. It stole the show out from under MS and SONY.
Smartphones are evolving much faster than you think. My Incredible, which is over a year old, has HD video recording and a really good camera. Furthermore, Android phones that are updated as far as 2.1 have fully functioning web browsing capabilities complete with flash support. As for games, those too are evolving. You only need to look as far as some of the titles coming out on the Xperia Play. Or if those aren't your thing you also have Infinity Blade on the iPhone, multiple Square Enix RPGs on iOS and, Spectral Souls (A fully developed SRPG with over 60 hours of content) on both iOS and AndroidHaha, great jokes. I think the real question is "Why would someone want to buy a device that does shallow games, a poor digital camera, plays MP3s but with bad battery life, a piss-poor web browser, and comes with an expensive monthly bill when what they want is to play great games?" Oh, and those cheaper games for your phone are cheaper because they have so little content, let's not forget that important detail.
To your average person convenience is a big thing. There are far more casual consumers than there are hardcore gamers. Who the hell wants to carry around multiple devices when there is one that can more than cover their needs. Furthermore, how many people really have time to sit around and play portable consoles for any extended amount of time? Most people who have that kind of time and want to game have the ability to do so on a console like the 360 or PS3 or PC. For most people the gaming capabilities of your average smartphone is more than enough to satisfy any on the go gaming needs.Smartphones do a lot, but they master none of it. I can get a better game platform. I can get a better digital camera. I can get a better MP3 player. I can get a device with a better web browser (it's called a laptop). Smartphones sacrifice quality for convenience, and while that might be good for just your average joe looking for something to dick around with while he waits in line at the DMV or something, gamers aren't buying them over dedicated gaming machines, photographers aren't buying them over quality cameras, and so on.
No, the markets will certainly live on but I will wager that portable gaming is going to quickly get put aside in a niche market made up of hardcore gamers and children. However, as mobile devices continue to evolve they will continue to take larger shares of portable market as more and more they will be able to offer a competitive product to that of the DSs and other such portable consoles.Smartphones may be taking away sales from other various electronics from casual users of other devices (game systems, cameras, better MP3 players, etc), but they aren't ending the "era" of any of those devices. And to think otherwise means that you are the ones who are truly blind and in denial.
I will be shocked if the 3DS does anywhere near the numbers the original DS has accomplished. With far too big of an entry price and the shrinking market for portable gaming as a whole the 3DS has an uphill battle ahead of it.Also, you underestimate Nintendo. They'll fix their marketing and come Christmas, everyone and their grandmother will be trying to get a 3DS, just like the DS and Wii before it.
Yea comics are funny, but I'm not going to argue that Kinect is bad because it spies on you, takes photos of you in your underwear and posts them on the internet, and turns you into a furry. I would hope that most people don't rely on webcomics to get their facts.faefrost said:Snip it all to hell
Scratched to hell? What are you using to play games, a fork? I don't have a single scratch on any of my touch screens.Kiraxa said:short battery life, crappy launch titles, same shitty touchscreen as the ds which gets scratched to hell in a few hours of use, more expensive than a ps3. I'm surprised they managed to get as many people as they did.