Military Laser Slices Steel 1km Away

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
kajinking said:
Ok it's effective against drones and mortars, but what about Deathclaws?
It could probably take on the hairy ones, these Germans look like they got high points in energy weapons.
 

TornadoADV

Cobra King
Apr 10, 2009
207
0
0
Defending against LASER based defenses would be something only first world countries could afford. But it's certainly doable.
 

Jfswift

Hmm.. what's this button do?
Nov 2, 2009
2,396
0
41
The good news is that the laser destroyed the incoming missile. The bad news is that it exploded right outside your plane.
 

Groenteman

New member
Mar 30, 2011
120
0
0
Lucky Godzilla said:
Vuliev said:
Ok, so relection wouldnt realy work, but my point still stands. This has a lot of work to do before it will be worthwhile, mostly in the area of range and targeting. 1Km sounds like a lot, but unless you know where the missle is going to land and can get there in time, you would need an insane number of the things to cover, for examples, all populated areas in range of palastine missles.
 

Risingblade

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,893
0
0
Damn it the Germans beat us to it. Well that's ok it's not like they've ever done anything bad with weapons...
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Redlin5 said:
It's always the Germans, isn't it? Still, very fascinating. Conventional guns will never be taken out of production however. This stuff sounds incredibly expensive and even if a handheld weapon were devised, I bet it would be very limited. Probably using a powerpack on the back or something for energy. Who knows...
tanks. lazer tanks with mini reactors for power. unstoppable.

also, as for how fast it works, its all about aiming, and its going to aim as good as the aiming mechamnism is, and for that they use real military grade AA weapon mechanism, so it aism as good as it used to, just destroys more efficiently.
 

SL33TBL1ND

Elite Member
Nov 9, 2008
6,467
0
41
Cid SilverWing said:
Terrifyingly ambitious, if I do say so myself.

Starting to wonder how long it'll be before lasers obsolete gunpowder.
I would think the only thing holding that back is powering the damn things. Making a 50kW laser that someone can hold and operate independent of a massive box producing the requisite power would be difficult, I'd think.

Still cool, though.
 

Lola Lazerface

New member
Nov 26, 2012
31
0
0
Cid SilverWing said:
Terrifyingly ambitious, if I do say so myself.

Starting to wonder how long it'll be before lasers obsolete gunpowder.
Please stop saying "if I do say so myself" when you're not talking about something you did. Please.

On topic: I demand a share of the profits considering this was clearly inspired by the beautiful human being that is me.
 

Pandalisk

New member
Jan 25, 2009
3,248
0
0
I'm not surprised Rheinmetall came up with this, they have a long history of creating the most OP weapons of the decade.
 

someonehairy-ish

New member
Mar 15, 2009
1,949
0
0
meatloaf231 said:
Let me get this straight.

Humanity just made a laser that we then used to blow up robots.
Holy shit.

Did we basically just invent lascannon?

OT: This is way OP. Nerf it, naow.
 

uttaku

New member
Sep 20, 2010
122
0
0
Elijah Newton said:
Now to find some sharks.

(please, by all that is good, have we finally arrived at the happy day when nobody catches the reference?)
no sharks, we do however have ill tempered mutated sea bass
 

OniaPL

New member
Nov 9, 2010
1,057
0
0
It makes me so happy whenever science proves to me that maybe our world isn't so boring after all.
 

Prince Regent

New member
Dec 9, 2007
811
0
0
Groenteman said:
Lucky Godzilla said:
Vuliev said:
Ok, so relection wouldnt realy work, but my point still stands. This has a lot of work to do before it will be worthwhile, mostly in the area of range and targeting. 1Km sounds like a lot, but unless you know where the missle is going to land and can get there in time, you would need an insane number of the things to cover, for examples, all populated areas in range of palastine missles.
True, but theres an easy solution. You simperingly build an even stronger laserrr. Theyre all prototypes and proofs of concept at this moment anyway.
 

Kyber

New member
Oct 14, 2009
716
0
0
Quazimofo said:
Cid SilverWing said:
Terrifyingly ambitious, if I do say so myself.

Starting to wonder how long it'll be before lasers obsolete gunpowder.
I doubt gunpowder/projectile weapons will ever become 100% obsolete. Lasers are awesome, but there ain't nothing like a bolter round (which SOMEONE should be working on RIGHT NOW).
I think someone must have said once that swords will never become obsolete, firearms are just so inaccurate and slow.
 

Alcamonic

New member
Jan 6, 2010
747
0
0
Yes yes, that is nice and all. Can we now please start to make laser bread/cheese slicers?
 

The Heik

King of the Nael
Oct 12, 2008
1,568
0
0
Quazimofo said:
Cid SilverWing said:
Terrifyingly ambitious, if I do say so myself.

Starting to wonder how long it'll be before lasers obsolete gunpowder.
I doubt gunpowder/projectile weapons will ever become 100% obsolete. Lasers are awesome, but there ain't nothing like a bolter round (which SOMEONE should be working on RIGHT NOW).
Well we already have bolt rounds of a sort

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20_mm_caliber

Theo only reason why we don't have bolters is because you NEED to either have powered armour or mount it on a vehicle to fire it, else the recoil can break your arm un supported (or at the very least bruise it immensely), and a weaspon that directly damges it's user it wholly inefficient. Besides, anything bigger than a .50 cal is overkill versus infantry, so carrying such heavy ammo in any combative amount is largely pointless.

OT: Nice little machine, but I do wonder it if will have the same practicality issues as the THEL and YAL-1 (linked below)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_High_Energy_Laser

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1

If they have, then it's shaping up to be a pretty awesome new weapon against missile attacks. If not then meh, nothing I haven't seen before.