It could probably take on the hairy ones, these Germans look like they got high points in energy weapons.kajinking said:Ok it's effective against drones and mortars, but what about Deathclaws?
It could probably take on the hairy ones, these Germans look like they got high points in energy weapons.kajinking said:Ok it's effective against drones and mortars, but what about Deathclaws?
Lucky Godzilla said:snip
Ok, so relection wouldnt realy work, but my point still stands. This has a lot of work to do before it will be worthwhile, mostly in the area of range and targeting. 1Km sounds like a lot, but unless you know where the missle is going to land and can get there in time, you would need an insane number of the things to cover, for examples, all populated areas in range of palastine missles.Vuliev said:snap
tanks. lazer tanks with mini reactors for power. unstoppable.Redlin5 said:It's always the Germans, isn't it? Still, very fascinating. Conventional guns will never be taken out of production however. This stuff sounds incredibly expensive and even if a handheld weapon were devised, I bet it would be very limited. Probably using a powerpack on the back or something for energy. Who knows...
I would think the only thing holding that back is powering the damn things. Making a 50kW laser that someone can hold and operate independent of a massive box producing the requisite power would be difficult, I'd think.Cid SilverWing said:Terrifyingly ambitious, if I do say so myself.
Starting to wonder how long it'll be before lasers obsolete gunpowder.
Please stop saying "if I do say so myself" when you're not talking about something you did. Please.Cid SilverWing said:Terrifyingly ambitious, if I do say so myself.
Starting to wonder how long it'll be before lasers obsolete gunpowder.
Holy shit.meatloaf231 said:Let me get this straight.
Humanity just made a laser that we then used to blow up robots.
no sharks, we do however have ill tempered mutated sea bassElijah Newton said:Now to find some sharks.
(please, by all that is good, have we finally arrived at the happy day when nobody catches the reference?)
True, but theres an easy solution. You simperingly build an even stronger laserrr. Theyre all prototypes and proofs of concept at this moment anyway.Groenteman said:Lucky Godzilla said:snipOk, so relection wouldnt realy work, but my point still stands. This has a lot of work to do before it will be worthwhile, mostly in the area of range and targeting. 1Km sounds like a lot, but unless you know where the missle is going to land and can get there in time, you would need an insane number of the things to cover, for examples, all populated areas in range of palastine missles.Vuliev said:snap
I think someone must have said once that swords will never become obsolete, firearms are just so inaccurate and slow.Quazimofo said:I doubt gunpowder/projectile weapons will ever become 100% obsolete. Lasers are awesome, but there ain't nothing like a bolter round (which SOMEONE should be working on RIGHT NOW).Cid SilverWing said:Terrifyingly ambitious, if I do say so myself.
Starting to wonder how long it'll be before lasers obsolete gunpowder.
Well we already have bolt rounds of a sortQuazimofo said:I doubt gunpowder/projectile weapons will ever become 100% obsolete. Lasers are awesome, but there ain't nothing like a bolter round (which SOMEONE should be working on RIGHT NOW).Cid SilverWing said:Terrifyingly ambitious, if I do say so myself.
Starting to wonder how long it'll be before lasers obsolete gunpowder.