I was going to say....did they fix the bullshit where I can't go outside without stuttering unless I have it on low-medium?Sigmund Av Volsung said:
thats not even gaming outrage materialKerethos said:
wwhhhhaaaaaat?.....no way thats real...its too horribly perfect...NuclearKangaroo said:aparently, this was written inside the code of the game
"this is PC only who cares"
they shouldve added "im going to leave this comment on the code, i mean whats the worst that could happen?"
Could you explain that? Really what does that even mean? You are not forced to use mods, do they offend your senses or something? Help everyone understand the hardships of the console only gamer, because honestly your reply above makes no sense at all.LaochEire said:
Hawkeye21 said:
azurine said:
He is saying ignorance is bliss, as long as he doesn't acknowledge that things could be better he can lead the perfect life.Strelok said:
Reminds me of that time one of the programmers named something FeministWhore in a game, it was an ability or something. Programming is fun.NuclearKangaroo said:aparently, this was written inside the code of the game
"this is PC only who cares"
they shouldve added "im going to leave this comment on the code, i mean whats the worst that could happen?"
Can confirm that it's legit.TopazFusion said:I call bull on this.NuclearKangaroo said:aparently, this was written inside the code of the game
During the process of compiling human-readable code into machine-readable code, comments are removed.
It *is* possible to decompile machine code back into editable text, but you don't get the comments back when you do.
So I call bull on this image.
Where did you get this from? Either is fake, or it's leaked by one of the devs.
Mod only modifies config files and should work with any version of the game. I've never heard of Ubisoft banning anyone for modding before. Framerate improvement is not guaranteed, but it works for me and some other people. I see no harm in trying it out.Mr.K. said:
Because pirates most likely. That and they want to give an early boost to the current-gen consoles by lying and saying "they actually can run at the equivalent of ultra settings on PC! Buy this version!". That and they probably had some sort of deal with Sony or Microsoft to make the console versions look better to hide the fact that they're actually pretty underpowered.NuclearKangaroo said:
Your response makes less sense. The poster I was replying to said that this was the reason he gamed on PC, mods. He doesn't have to use these mods, but they obviously fix Watch Dogs' gimped graphics and are of an obvious benefit to him. Personally, I can be bothered with it. I can't be bothered to wait months for someone to potentially fix a problem with a game. I can't be bothered tinkering with settings or dealing with all that. I just choose console for simplicity and comfort.Strelok said:
Oh my. Ooooooh my. That is quite the blunder... Hopefully this whole shebang will cause a lot of modders to try and get it to look as good as possible, simply out of spite for Ubi. "We can do anything better than you"black_knight1337 said:Can confirm that it's legit.TopazFusion said:I call bull on this.NuclearKangaroo said:aparently, this was written inside the code of the game
During the process of compiling human-readable code into machine-readable code, comments are removed.
It *is* possible to decompile machine code back into editable text, but you don't get the comments back when you do.
So I call bull on this image.
Where did you get this from? Either is fake, or it's leaked by one of the devs.
I don't get what you mean either, sorry :/ It's a little confusing. If you have two versions of a game (in this case, PC and console), that are both sort of broken, wouldn't you go with the one that could potentially be fixed instead of the one that won't? Of course you don't have to bother with it, but it's nice to have the option.LaochEire said:
Well, you're making the assumption I am having issues with the console version graphically. I'm not. That's how it looks on those machines. It doesn't bother me.Pinkamena said:
the neogaf thread, the compiler always ignores comments dude, try it yourself in any programming language such as java or CTopazFusion said:I call bull on this.NuclearKangaroo said:aparently, this was written inside the code of the game
During the process of compiling human-readable code into machine-readable code, comments are removed.
It *is* possible to decompile machine code back into editable text, but you don't get the comments back when you do.
So I call bull on this image.
Where did you get this from? Either is fake, or it's leaked by one of the devs.
indeed it makes no sense, last quarter PC was the leading platform salewise for ubisoftMeChaNiZ3D said:Reminds me of that time one of the programmers named something FeministWhore in a game, it was an ability or something. Programming is fun.NuclearKangaroo said:aparently, this was written inside the code of the game
"this is PC only who cares"
they shouldve added "im going to leave this comment on the code, i mean whats the worst that could happen?"
OT: I don't really get the thought process behind this. They're crippling the PC version so that the console versions are comparable in graphical quality, for what? Do they have a deal with Sony and Microsoft where they don't make the PC version look too good? There are plenty of games that look better on PC and aren't ashamed of it, and that's natural because PCs don't have to be made at a certain budget or limited to release technology. As a console player, that's something people already accept, are they trying to perpetuate a myth of technological parity between consoles and high-end PCs? I can't see how the massive outrage over graphics and accusations of bullshotting outweigh good relations with console manufacturers where there is no expectation of product parity in the first place.
