Crysis is gameplay wise, one of the most advanced and best shooters of the generation.Irreducible Sohn said:This. All of this.evilneko said:Any CryTek game.
People wouldn't give two cents of attention to say Crysis if it weren't for the graphics.
Apparently as a PC gamer it's all I care about.Mysterious Username said:I always here about how people think graphics are the only thing that matters, but I have yet to see someone who actually thinks that. It's like it's some kind of theoretical strawman that everyone is convinced exists, but it actually just a figment of our fears of developers misunderstandings of what gamers want.
On topic, every great classic console game.
Well i had a lot of fun with crysis one. it was no masterpiece but the abilities were fun to use.Irreducible Sohn said:This. All of this.evilneko said:Any CryTek game.
People wouldn't give two cents of attention to say Crysis if it weren't for the graphics.
Honestly, Crysis was awesome. Its multiplayer wasn't so great, but to be fair I was terribad at it, so that might have had something to do with it. But I loved the single player, and loading mod maps was always interesting. And, as you said, it is so much better than Call of Shit: Modern Scumbag 2. Yeah, not beating around the bush with that one.Amaror said:Well i had a lot of fun with crysis one. it was no masterpiece but the abilities were fun to use.Irreducible Sohn said:This. All of this.evilneko said:Any CryTek game.
People wouldn't give two cents of attention to say Crysis if it weren't for the graphics.
It was not a great game but i liked it a lot more than, say, modern warfare 2.
and there's your first clue they don't know what they're talking about and should probably start disregarding they're opinions on what qualify for good gamesfnlrpa said:maybe not on this site, but I have met a bunch of people at school who hated some games because "the graphics are not as good as call of duty"
I'm not saying Crysis is a bad game, but it does get overblown because of the graphics IMO.Amaror said:Well i had a lot of fun with crysis one. it was no masterpiece but the abilities were fun to use.Irreducible Sohn said:This. All of this.evilneko said:Any CryTek game.
People wouldn't give two cents of attention to say Crysis if it weren't for the graphics.
It was not a great game but i liked it a lot more than, say, modern warfare 2.
I would argue that Minecraft Graphics are pretty good and really add to the effect of the game. Of all recent games, that's probably one of the ones where the graphics contribute most to how good the game is.ohnoitsabear said:I'm going to have to go with the obvious example of Minecraft, or Dwarf Fortress (not exactly sure on when it first came out, but the fact that it's being regularly updated makes it modern enough), which has text based graphics and ends up being a unique and memorable experience, partially because of the lack of fancy models or sprites.
Although I must argue that despite graphics not being an indicator of quality, good graphics can enhance the experience of a game. For example, Metro 2033 would not been nearly as effective without the outstanding graphics.
I didn't mention PC classics because I've never played most of them.Frostbite3789 said:Apparently as a PC gamer it's all I care about.Mysterious Username said:I always here about how people think graphics are the only thing that matters, but I have yet to see someone who actually thinks that. It's like it's some kind of theoretical strawman that everyone is convinced exists, but it actually just a figment of our fears of developers misunderstandings of what gamers want.
On topic, every great classic console game.
Hang on while I go play Minecraft for a bit and think about how all I care about is graphics.