ReservoirAngel said:
So some people may have seen my thread in the Advice Forum about improving my writing ability.
Commonly recieved advice was: just read a lot of books in the genre your interested in writing. Well for me, that genre is Sci Fi.
trouble is, I'm not very knowledgeable about book releases and stuff like that, and the only Sci Fi novels I seem to be able to find in local bookstores are based off Sci Fi games. and i don't wanna read a book based off Halo, thank you VERY much.
So, with that in mind, I ask if anyone here knows any decent, modern Sci Fi books I could possibly look into?
I'm more than happy to help you, I just need some more information on your interests. How do you define "modern sci-fi"? Because if you mean in the last 50 years, then there are plenty of really great works to recommend. Truly groundbreaking stuff. If you mean the last decade, then we have less stuff.
The problem is that there hasn't been anyone to truly step up as a Science Fiction author in the past decade. There used to be a ton, Asimov, Clarke, Card, Le Guine, Norton, and more. But they all got old (or crazy, or bad). So, while Fantasy had new authors (like Patrick Rothfuss and George R.R. Martin) to step in to fill in the last generations shoes (like Tolkien, Lewis, etc), science fiction is kind of in a limbo now.
That's not to say there isn't good stuff out there, but that it's limited. It's a few books here and there instead of saying "Oh, just read everything by so and so."
Secondly, what kind of sci fi do you want? There's Space Opera, which is Star Wars, Star Trek, BSG, etc. It's big, grandiose conflict with heroes who are Real Men and Real Women. It used to be a lot more like Star Wars, but lately the trend has been towards existential crisis and what it means to be human. Think like the new Battlestar Galactica, what with cylons and downloading and all. Can be very weird. But this is mostly about heroes and villains. Characters are the focus, with the science fiction part essentially being "magic." That's not to say it's inherently unrealistic, just that realism is not the focus, the story of the characters is.
This is related to, but different, from Military Science Fiction. Think Space Opera but with more of a focus on military stuff. Like Stargate SG-1, this is more about fighting aliens than anything else. It's fun, it's entertaining, it can make you think, but it's never really risen much above pulp fiction as a genre. Think Tom Clancy novels with aliens. Character driven, but driven in a space tank with ray guns to an ass-kicking fest and we're bringing the rail guns.
None of this is like Hard Science Fiction. This is what many claim Star Trek is, but I don't think it did a good job. The best example is Arthur C. Clarke's novels and movie 2001. The movie Sunshine, for all it's flaws, falls here too. It's the more realistic science fiction. Some rules are bent, but mostly it emphasizes realism and the science. Aliens sometimes exist, but not always. Communication is limited by light speed, relativistic time dilation is often a major player. But the stories are usually about man's place in the universe. Characters don't matter, so much, they just exist as proxies for archetypes. The real focus is on how people and nature are changed by technology, not individuals.
These summaries are not meant to be a value judgment. I prefer space opera, but have had a lot of fun with Military Sci-Fi. Hard SF makes you think, but a lot of the time, you just want the full of himself, overly verbose, stuck up author to shut up about philosophy and just fucking tell the story.
So, what are you looking for?