Molyneux's Curiosity Offers $77,800 DLC

Gather

New member
Apr 9, 2009
492
0
0
And if the person who spent 70 grand doesn't get to be the first to see the inside of the cube due to sheer luck I wonder how annoyed said person would be.
 

ThePS1Fan

New member
Dec 22, 2011
635
0
0
Here's my idea. Start a kickstarter to buy this thing, sit there and live stream until you've uncover whatever the hell it is.
 

RJ Dalton

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,285
0
0
The purpose of this experiment is not to make money.
That's just a bonus.

I think Mr. Molyneux may actually be insane. The Mr. Teatime sort of insane, in that he doesn't see other people in the same way that you or I do.
 

MeChaNiZ3D

New member
Aug 30, 2011
3,104
0
0
Just think, If 1000 other people with iron chisels are also playing, the guy with the diamond chisel will only have a 50% chance. Personally I wouldnt waste that much money on what could be less than a 50% chance.
 

zombiesinc

One day, we'll wake the zombies
Mar 29, 2010
2,508
0
0
Color me uninterested. Also, this is the first I've heard of him leaving Lionhead Studios. I'm more relieved than disappointed.
 

UsefulPlayer 1

New member
Feb 22, 2008
1,776
0
0
Then there should be the 1,000 dollar choice of sealing the cube and not let anyone ever find out what's inside!

I still don't see the motivation for anyone to care for what's inside the cube. Hardly a Golden Ticket into the mysteries of the Willy Wonka factory.
 

Doom-Slayer

Ooooh...I has custom title.
Jul 18, 2009
630
0
0
Hookah said:
Hevva said:
"It's an insane amount of money," says Molyneux. The aim of the diamond chisel is experimental: Can curiosity alone drive one player or a syndicate to spend that much money? "This is not a money-making exercise; it is a test about the psychology of monetization," he added.
Of course not. If it was a money-making exercise then the pick wouldn't have such an enormous price tag now would it.

Oh.

Wait.

The test is to see whether someone will pay such a large amount of money for "Curiosity". If the price wasnt that high then they wouldnt be able to test that...
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
LOL, there is no social experiment here. Its more of Petes magical hype machine duping people into thinking its something more impressive than it is.



Though, I think we all know whats inside the cube.... Naked pictures of Peter Molyneaux.
 

Hunter65416

New member
Oct 22, 2010
1,068
0
0
I love it..but if someone actually buys the diamond chisel and opens the box..its going to have to be bloody good to stop them from vomiting from the realization that they just wasted 77k

IM CALLING IT HERE: Inside the box will be their money back..and maybe something else
 

Innocent Bystander

New member
Jan 29, 2012
59
0
0
Is anyone else wondering whose idea it was to let Peter Molyneux out of the padded cell and get him making video games?
 

Innocent Bystander

New member
Jan 29, 2012
59
0
0
RJ Dalton said:
The purpose of this experiment is not to make money.
That's just a bonus.

I think Mr. Molyneux may actually be insane. The Mr. Teatime sort of insane, in that he doesn't see other people in the same way that you or I do.
Nice Terry Pratchett allusion. He's really just Mr. Teatime if he joined the Accountants Guild rather than the Assassins Guild.
 

Jingle Fett

New member
Sep 13, 2011
379
0
0
When I heard the name Molyneux I was like Oh boy, what has he done now...but this is actually kind of genius, I'm really intrigued at what will happen. The money really is just a bonus (besides, why shouldn't he make some money off this?) the real objective is to see how people react.
 

Pharsalus

New member
Jun 16, 2011
330
0
0
Man I never realized that mr Populous was, in fact, a Bond villain this entire time.
 

ultrachicken

New member
Dec 22, 2009
4,303
0
0
Hookah said:
Hevva said:
"It's an insane amount of money," says Molyneux. The aim of the diamond chisel is experimental: Can curiosity alone drive one player or a syndicate to spend that much money? "This is not a money-making exercise; it is a test about the psychology of monetization," he added.
Of course not. If it was a money-making exercise then the pick wouldn't have such an enormous price tag now would it.

Oh.

Wait.
If he really cared so much about making money, he would be producing more Fable games. They're not Call of Duty, but he would be making much more than 70k off that.
 

Danceofmasks

New member
Jul 16, 2010
1,512
0
0
It's an experiment on how stupid people can be.

If a whole bunch of people chip away, and by a whole bunch i mean >100,000 people, then the odds of the person who bought the diamond chisel getting the final hit is less than 50%.

So. Who's up for spending $80k on less than even odds of potentially seeing a trollface?
 

Aphantas

New member
Apr 29, 2010
64
0
0
I keep on seeing others post on how the goal will not be worth the cash, or that the experiment will be ruined by video uploads, macros, code cracking etc.
I think that they are missing the point of this experiment.
Its not about the reward, but what we will do (or not do) to get it.

The thing that fascinates me most about this experiment though is the fact that any action that you take on this, including inaction, can be considered a a valid response to it.

For example non-participation shows that your decisions are not driven by curiosity.
If the code is cracked or macros are used it shows just what lengths we will go to in order to not spend money, while still satiating our curiosity.
Hell, even talking about it on forum sites could be regarded as a response and thus contribute to the data.

Molyneux and Co. really are brilliant; this experiment cannot break and could have further reaching consequences than we can imagine. You can be sure that advertisers and retailers would be very interested in this experiment...