I personally prefer ethics over morals. Much stricter and well discussed in my opinion. Morals on their own, well, seem far too loose to be of use in every setting, do unto others, be nice and all that sound perfectly fine, and, they are, it's when people start adding exceptions to those moral rules when things start going downhill.
Love thy neighbour. Except if he's black, or gay, or Chinese, or doesn't believe what you believe. That is what I hate about morals, and that doesn't just apply to religious thinking either, but any line of thought or coda where that kind of crap pops up.
Which, as I said, is why I prefer ethics. Or at least, morality where, things are incessantly thought out, that are inclusive of everyone and don't make exceptions based on personal disagreements.
As for my own predilections toward moral thinking, I'm pretty loose. I'm gravy with well, most things as long as they don't cause undue harm against another, physical or otherwise. And even then am in support of practices such as S&M where both parties have agreed to it, even if mind you I don't partake myself.
Love thy neighbour. Except if he's black, or gay, or Chinese, or doesn't believe what you believe. That is what I hate about morals, and that doesn't just apply to religious thinking either, but any line of thought or coda where that kind of crap pops up.
Which, as I said, is why I prefer ethics. Or at least, morality where, things are incessantly thought out, that are inclusive of everyone and don't make exceptions based on personal disagreements.
As for my own predilections toward moral thinking, I'm pretty loose. I'm gravy with well, most things as long as they don't cause undue harm against another, physical or otherwise. And even then am in support of practices such as S&M where both parties have agreed to it, even if mind you I don't partake myself.