Seriously? Thats awesome! But I would love to see it on my actual TV though, poor thing doesn't get used unless I'm playing video games.maddawg IAJI said:Its been on ESPN for quite a while now actually, or at least the website.
It airs on several different stations and every now and again, on ESPN itself. Its been airing on TV at least since 2006 and I remember that because I remember watching the Halo 2 MLG final on TV.NinjaTigerXIII said:Seriously? Thats awesome! But I would love to see it on my actual TV though, poor thing doesn't get used unless I'm playing video games.maddawg IAJI said:Its been on ESPN for quite a while now actually, or at least the website.
You've misread the NBA statistics. 17.2 million was the viewership averaged across the entire six game series. According to the article you linked, Game 6 last night delivered 23.5 million viewers, which is more than MLG was able to muster over the entire three day event.John Funk said:It's a lot closer this way, but honestly, that still ain't too shabby at all. For comparison, last night's NBA finals Game 6 reportedly clocked in 17.2 million viewers [http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/06/13/2011-nba-finals-on-abc-second-most-viewed-since-2004/95475/]. MLG still comes out ahead here, and even though you could argue that these numbers are fudged thanks to multiple streams broadcasting at once, it has every right to be proud of its numbers.
That's why I think we need to establish some rules. What makes a sport? What's it about? Is it physical exertion, team play, mental strategy, what? There are lots of things that are "games" and "sports" like football(both) or baseball but what qualifies a thing as a "sport"?NightlyNews said:I watch professional go players (go is like if checkers and chess had a lovechild, although it is without a doubt more strategy based than checkers and many believe it is deeper than chess).Twilight_guy said:I think we need official rules on what qualifies as a sport. I considering gaming in the same category as chess. Is chess a sport? (Honestly, I'm not sure on this one). Gaming a chess are both primarily mental with little physical exertion. This falls into the same challenge as art in a way though since both are nebulous bullshit terms with no hard definition. Of course I don't know about MLG since being art gives game legitimacy as a side-effect but being a sport gets them... sponsors? I dunno.
I imagine watching strategy games like starcraft are similar to me watching pro go players. Not sure if it's a sport, but other countries take go very seriously -second most played board game.
According to wikipedia go can be a sport, not really sure if that means anything to you though :]
Yea I agree. Wikipedia says "A sport is an organized, competitive, entertaining, and skillful activity requiring commitment, strategy, and fair play, in which a winner can be defined by objective means." But, that's so broad I would be hard pressed to find many activities that wouldn't be considered sports.Twilight_guy said:That's why I think we need to establish some rules. What makes a sport? What's it about? Is it physical exertion, team play, mental strategy, what? There are lots of things that are "games" and "sports" like football(both) or baseball but what qualifies a thing as a "sport"?NightlyNews said:I watch professional go players (go is like if checkers and chess had a lovechild, although it is without a doubt more strategy based than checkers and many believe it is deeper than chess).Twilight_guy said:I think we need official rules on what qualifies as a sport. I considering gaming in the same category as chess. Is chess a sport? (Honestly, I'm not sure on this one). Gaming a chess are both primarily mental with little physical exertion. This falls into the same challenge as art in a way though since both are nebulous bullshit terms with no hard definition. Of course I don't know about MLG since being art gives game legitimacy as a side-effect but being a sport gets them... sponsors? I dunno.
I imagine watching strategy games like starcraft are similar to me watching pro go players. Not sure if it's a sport, but other countries take go very seriously -second most played board game.
According to wikipedia go can be a sport, not really sure if that means anything to you though :]
Partially. The old games used to be new then. Now its pretty retro.Woodsey said:not_sure_if_serious.jpgPopido said:Thats quite lot considering that I thought professional gaming died with PC gaming.
You have no idea how relieved I was to see them come out on top. I absolutely hate Lebron and Dwayne and I honestly believed the Mavericks worked harder for their trip to the finals. You guys sweeped the Lakers. As a Boston fan, I have to give you guys credit for that.Ghostwise said:I'll be that guy too. Perhaps if we added all viewership from every finals game it would be a closer comparison. With that being said and being a Dallas native, THE MAVS ARE WORLD CHAMPIONS!!! Never thought I'd live to see the day and to see it done the way it was, is the ultimate vengeance and vindication.maddawg IAJI said:"...from 164 countries watching four streams over the three-day competition."
I hate to be that guy, but being an international thing and streaming an event tend to net you more folks then a sport that is only widely followed in the west. Plus, your counting all the viewers from a 3-day event and comparing it to one game, which went late into Sunday night and wasn't all that exciting. Most people in the east coast we're probably turning off their televisions by the time the game went into the 3rd quarter. If Miami had won that game, I can guarantee you this, the MLG would not have come close to the amount of viewers who would watch game 7.
In short, no, the MLG did not have more viewers then the NBA Finals, their entire event had more viewers then game 6, but that's it. The MLG did have more viewers then the NFL draft and I will give them credit for that one.![]()
Not exactly, because plenty of viewers watched more than one game.Ghostwise said:And if you take the average over the course of the 6 games and ad it up you will see that the finals were witnessed by over 103 million people!
as a fellow C's fan i have to agree. I've got no particular beef with Wade, and i can forgive Lebron now that i know that Boston was the reason Lebron decided to leave Cleveland and ruin his life. The Mavs just played hard, though, and they deserved to win to make up for 2006.maddawg IAJI said:You have no idea how relieved I was to see them come out on top. I absolutely hate Lebron and Dwayne and I honestly believed the Mavericks worked harder for their trip to the finals. You guys sweeped the Lakers. As a Boston fan, I have to give you guys credit for that.
That's true. Corrected.cobra_ky said:You've misread the NBA statistics. 17.2 million was the viewership averaged across the entire six game series. According to the article you linked, Game 6 last night delivered 23.5 million viewers, which is more than MLG was able to muster over the entire three day event.John Funk said:It's a lot closer this way, but honestly, that still ain't too shabby at all. For comparison, last night's NBA finals Game 6 reportedly clocked in 17.2 million viewers [http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/06/13/2011-nba-finals-on-abc-second-most-viewed-since-2004/95475/]. MLG still comes out ahead here, and even though you could argue that these numbers are fudged thanks to multiple streams broadcasting at once, it has every right to be proud of its numbers.
Good try though!