I actually kinda liked it...ALuckyChance said:Mine would have to be The Children of Hurin; anyone agree that it was incredibly dull?
Anyway, I'd say Catcher in the Rye.
Yeah, I said it.
I actually kinda liked it...ALuckyChance said:Mine would have to be The Children of Hurin; anyone agree that it was incredibly dull?
I don't even know if I'll ever finish that book. Damn text is so small I keep losing my place, and half the time I don't even care about what's going on.Xpwn3ntial said:Ayn Rand is a difficult author to read. I still have as of yet to finish Atlas Shrugged. It's good, but difficult.
The irony of your statement is hilarious.Xiado said:"A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius". Yes, that is the actual title of the book. It is so terrible I could not read parts of it, my body rebelled against it. I still have its ashes.
Oh my gawd, I only read The Hobbit and that was still an uncanny mission. Something about the way he writes is just off. Good read still.RhombusHatesYou said:Displaying my heresy here, I'll say ANYTHING BY TOLKIEN.
The Silmarillion. End of discussion.ALuckyChance said:Mine would have to be The Children of Hurin; anyone agree that it was incredibly dull?
Most difficult to read - to me, anyway - would be Robinson Crusoe, simply because of the insane amounts of semicolons in every mammoth-sized sentence, that once you finish you immediately forget what it was all about.
You fucking ninja you, I came in this topic to say exactly that!Outright Villainy said:I agree. Oh so much.RhombusHatesYou said:Displaying my heresy here, I'll say ANYTHING BY TOLKIEN.
And then they came upon a tree. And it was a fine tree with many branches, and its many branches had many leaves. On their quest to stop the evil sauron from destroying middle earth, they stopped for a picnic beneath the tree. They built a house and lived beneath the tree for 15 years, and had many lunches. Sometimes frodo had 6 slices of ham for lunch. He wrote a songs about his ham. These songs go on for 9 pages. The song went like this...
=D I like the last sentence. I might have to give it another look when I'm looking for things to read, and the movie was still on my "must-see-someday" list.coleslawghter said:Give twenty pages and youll be hooked, that book is so fucked up, Its a million times more disturbing than the movie. and its incredible
A clockwork orange, a real horror show book indeed, I viddied it at the library and was attracted to it like the good old in out, in out, real horrorshow indeed.
Hurin and the Silmarillion? Easy. Try the Left Behind series.RelexCryo said:The Silmarillion. End of discussion.ALuckyChance said:Mine would have to be The Children of Hurin; anyone agree that it was incredibly dull?
Most difficult to read - to me, anyway - would be Robinson Crusoe, simply because of the insane amounts of semicolons in every mammoth-sized sentence, that once you finish you immediately forget what it was all about.
To be fair, The Hobbit wasn't bad. However, Lord of the Rings was like bashing my head against a brick wall. A brick wall who's bricks were tenderly shaped by the hands of elves over many years, reinforced with mithril re-bar. The years have worn this wall... You get the point, it's a freakin' wall.RhombusHatesYou said:Displaying my heresy here, I'll say ANYTHING BY TOLKIEN.