Agreed a thousand times. I bought it expecting to enjoy, or at least appreciate, a classic. It was just really really average and uninteresting.Xan Holbrook said:This is going to seem like a red rag to every potential emo/literary historian bull, but 'Catcher In The Rye' was absolutely shockingly bad.
No it's not. Three pages without so much as paragraph break and I gave up on it.RhombusHatesYou said:Crime and Punishment is probably the longest I've spent on a book this year. On the other hand, its the good sort of difficult.
I'm with you on this one. I understand how important the book is in geek life, but I can't say I enjoyed reading it.RhombusHatesYou said:Currently reading Neuromancer, I'll admit, I had to look at a plot summary on the internet a couple of times to get myself up to speed.
I like LOTR, but I can see where you're coming from. They can be difficult to get into.RhombusHatesYou said:Displaying my heresy here, I'll say ANYTHING BY TOLKIEN.
QFT x100. Tolkien's style in LotR is just dire. The Hobbit is a wonderful story, well written and great for anyone to read. In an improv group I'm in, I once got told to tell a story in the style of Tolkien, and basically ended up describing every button on a computer console in high detail.Outright Villainy said:I agree. Oh so much.RhombusHatesYou said:Displaying my heresy here, I'll say ANYTHING BY TOLKIEN.
And then they came upon a tree. And it was a fine tree with many branches, and its many branches had many leaves. On their quest to stop the evil sauron from destroying middle earth, they stopped for a picnic beneath the tree. They built a house and lived beneath the tree for 15 years, and had many lunches. Sometimes frodo had 6 slices of ham for lunch. He wrote a songs about his ham. These songs go on for 9 pages. The song went like this...