Eh, the problem wasn't that something unexpected happened, it was that everything we were told about the movie was false. The basic premise I kept hearing was that it was supposed to be a "what if fairytales were real?" story, much like how Unbreakable was superheroes being real, and 6th sense was ghosts. Not really what it was though. Well, sort of, but not the way they kept advertising it. Don't get me wrong, it was a good movie, nice twist, everything. Smart film really. Problem is that is wasn't what I thought I was paying for.jamanticus post=18.71093.714003 said:Yes, and Heaven forbid the public should have something unexpected happen to them every once in a while, lolbroadband post=18.71093.713986 said:i also though that it was a nice movie, the problem is that the trailers made the ublic think that it was something diferentgamebrain89 post=18.71093.713872 said:I personally thought The Village was kinda clever. People razzed it to much in my opinion. I liked it. But thats just me. I'm strange that way.
Brick! That was such a great movie. The cinematography and dialog were amazing (the last line is a killer...), but whoever came up with that concept deserves a hearty pat on the back.Ares Tyr post=18.71093.714034 said:Brick is one of cleverist films I've ever seen. Cleverly written, the plot was clever, the dialogue was clever (and unique), and the way it was shot was clever. I just love the film all together and won't stop singing its praises until everyone has seen it. The best film noir movie since Pulp Fiction modernized it before it.
And while we are at it, Pulp Fiction was an extremely clever movie which told three different interconnecting stories from three different view points using awesome and witty dialogue along with an everyday sensebility. Love that movie, one of my favorites.
Agreed, sir. Very much agreed.MrCuddleswick post=18.71093.714832 said:Also, Donnie Darko deserves an additional mention because it assembles a new set of rules, immerses you in that world and then breaks your heart.
But not on first viewing. On first viewing it makes no sense.
if you get the dvd of snatch, it has "paikie" subtitles that only turn on when Brad Pitt is talking, cept for the aforementioned perwinkle blue bit, not that he's too hard to understand, especially after hanging out with a bunch of drunk newfiesSurreysmith post=18.71093.714963 said:I'm with you on snatch, I comletly didn't see the ending coming.juandonde post=18.71093.713935 said:Snatch was really funny
"periwinkle blue"
Okay- I've never seen the movie itself, but I saw the trailers they were running and then read the plot synopsis.... Ah well, it seems that The Village was either a fantastic movie or an absolutely terrible movie, depending on who watched itRocksa post=18.71093.715666 said:Eh, the problem wasn't that something unexpected happened, it was that everything we were told about the movie was false. The basic premise I kept hearing was that it was supposed to be a "what if fairytales were real?" story, much like how Unbreakable was superheroes being real, and 6th sense was ghosts. Not really what it was though. Well, sort of, but not the way they kept advertising it. Don't get me wrong, it was a good movie, nice twist, everything. Smart film really. Problem is that is wasn't what I thought I was paying for.jamanticus post=18.71093.714003 said:Yes, and Heaven forbid the public should have something unexpected happen to them every once in a while, lolbroadband post=18.71093.713986 said:i also though that it was a nice movie, the problem is that the trailers made the ublic think that it was something diferentgamebrain89 post=18.71093.713872 said:I personally thought The Village was kinda clever. People razzed it to much in my opinion. I liked it. But thats just me. I'm strange that way.
To put things simply.
You go to a restaurant, order a cheeseburger with the works, pay for said burger, wait for said burger, get excited about said burger, cashier calls your name up to come get said burger, you sit down with your still covered meal imagining how great this burger is going to be, I mean you are salivating at this point because everyone else was so excited about it. Open up your meal there and you have a chicken sandwich. Now this is a flippin' awesome chicken sandwich, probably one of the best you'll ever have, but you expected a burger and that's what you paid for, that's what you'd hoped for, and somehow you don't quite appreciate the sandwich as much because of it.
Same thing here.
Anyway, back to the topic at hand. Let's see...Identity was pretty awesome, had a nice twist to it, especially the end. Have to say that the ending has one of my favorite movie quotes in it. Cloverfield was also pretty nice, I mean you basically know what's going to happen right at the beginning if you pay attention to things, but to see how it gets to that point, thought it was nice.
I agree, the ending they went with completely contradicted the meaning of the novel. The revelation was that Smith's character was mindlessly slaughtering the mutuated, whom were displaying very human behaviours throughout the film, ie. setting up traps, displaying a form of verbal communication, having a clear leader, and to top it off, only wanted to rescue one of their own. He was meant to be the nightmare of their legend, hence the damned title. However, the American test audience was clearly gathered from the nearest trailer park because they didn't want to see the peaceful resolution of the intended ending. So, instead of Robert Neville realising his errors and making peace with the mutants, he 'valiantly' blows himself up just to take a few more of the bastards to hell with him. For more, see http://www.cracked.com/article_16258_5-awesome-movies-ruined-by-last-minute-changes.htmlMrCuddleswick post=18.71093.714929 said:On the subject of stupid endings, I Am Legend would have been a very smart movie if they'd have kept the original ending, instead of the ill-fitting one they chose to go with.