most disappointing things about mercenaries 2

Recommended Videos

camokkid

New member
Aug 13, 2009
1,268
0
0
i wnat you to tell me what thing made you the most disappointed in mercs 2

mine are that you can no long make poeople get out of your vehicle unless you get out

you still cant fly planes

but most of all is that the ai is is completely RETARDED
 

walls of cetepedes

New member
Jul 12, 2009
2,907
0
0
camokkid said:
mine are that you can no long make poeople get out of your vehicle unless you get out
Yes, that annoyed me. The one thing I hated was failing a chopper hijack.

Or the fact that landing in water does the same damage as landing on land.
 

Omikron009

New member
May 22, 2009
3,815
0
0
Yeah. No planes, bad AI, but mostly the addition of fuel and the lack of a convenient merchant of menace style shop. I still loved it and I don't think it deserved all of the criticism it got.
 

Insanum

The Basement Caretaker.
May 26, 2009
4,451
0
0
The distance you can go away from your ally on Co-Op.

Oil ¬¬

Awful AI, And no Planes.

Overall, not a very good game.
 

Nargleblarg

New member
Jun 24, 2008
1,583
0
0
The system of any cars/helicopters/tanks you get in will disguise you as a different faction but everyone usually wants to kill that faction...I mean I know it's realistic but neither is jumping from helicopters and surviving.
 

TheNumber1Zero

Forgot to Remember
Jul 23, 2009
7,345
0
0
buildings do not respond

it is possible to screw up your game by nuking the headquarters.

things I enjoy are:

the fact that I understood the ammo system perfectly oof the bat while others did not

that you could survive any fall (this one time I jumped out of a helicopter landed on a island and enjoyed the fact that the copter crashed right where I wanted it to,the target)
 

mitchellkenn

New member
Apr 23, 2009
42
0
0
The messed up damage calcualtion. So I take LESS damage when I'm INSIDE the tank when it explodes than if I'm standing right beside it?
 

VincentX3

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,299
0
0
It was a great and addicting game for me. I played non stop for a long time till I found all the parts and made havoc everywhere.

The AI was dumb though but could be worse.

Tanks are like made of cottencandy

There was one stupid mission to protect a giant mususem like building playing with the biker like dude, that pissed me off for a long time. Tanks coming from all sides destroying the building and me just there with a RL. Coudln't call in air strikes because I would destroy the building too.

The Graphcis on the PC were so so and the view distance was lame at times

But the game was good and addiciting.


EDIT: Ragdolling across the street when you get blown up, fall or run'ed over. That made me pissed till he got back on his feet.
 

Buck Wilde

New member
Jul 15, 2009
163
0
0
Yeah, not having a convienient shop sucked, as did needing fuel now. Also they should've changed the system of delivering bombs seeing as how 90% of them you have to throw a smoke signal for. Oh, and the nuke has like no blast radius : (
 

AceDiamond

New member
Jul 7, 2008
2,293
0
0
The game was about half as long as the first one, they managed to make every single NPC the most annoying entity in the universe, and the methodology behind a large number of air strikes and artillery strikes requiring smoke signals and radio beacons that you can't throw more than 5 feet was frustrating.

And it's a shame because it certainly played all right and watching entire city blocks get leveled was a thing of beauty.
 

DjaPavlak

New member
Feb 11, 2009
1
0
0
dumb AI, bright green US vehicles, lack of good US aircraft (V-22 anyone?), no cheat weapon crates, repeating voice parts (i actually turned off the vocal volume)...i could go on and on
 

cocoadog

New member
Oct 9, 2008
539
0
0
well it wasn't perfect but if you don't enjoy dropping nukes on every single civilian you see you probably shouldn't be playing the game, because that's all it is and I'm alright with that.
 

chiggerwood

Lurker Extrordinaire
May 10, 2009
865
0
0
Fat Man Spoon said:

the fact that landing in water does the same amount of damage as landing on land.
I don't mean to be a douche, but because of water tension it would cause the same damage. If you don't believe me do a belly flop
 

walls of cetepedes

New member
Jul 12, 2009
2,907
0
0
chiggerwood said:
Fat Man Spoon said:

the fact that landing in water does the same amount of damage as landing on land.
I don't mean to be a douche, but because of water tension it would cause the same damage. If you don't believe me do a belly flop
No... you're right. It's just... it goes against how every other game I've played works...