Most Overrated Movie and Why

Recommended Videos

Monty McDougal

New member
Mar 15, 2011
153
0
0
Jamboxdotcom said:
Avatar. Ok, it's pretty. That, to me, is not sufficient validation for a film. And the allegory is far too heavy-handed to be taken seriously, so any merit it might get for its "message" is lost because it's delivered so obnoxiously.
Can't say it better. Even if it was ANY good it still would not live up to the hype.
 

HassEsser

New member
Jul 31, 2009
859
0
0
Avatar

Transformers 1

Transformers 2

Transformers 3

and a few more I'm too lazy to think about and try to remember
 

aakibar

New member
Apr 14, 2009
468
0
0
SirBryghtside said:
2001: A Space Odyssey. I watched it and was bored out of my skull, but I was genuinely interested in why people thought it was good. A couple of reviews later, and I find out the answer was because it's really good art, and anyone who says otherwise just doesn't 'get' it.

*sigh*
yea I agree with you, i tried to watch it but it just didn't work as a movie. As a book on the other hand its pretty dang good and as the years went on I think clarke figured out a way to explain the mind fuck that was going on.

But for me recently it would be inglorious basterds, it was good and all but it wasn't my cup of tea, the acting was amazing but it was just not one of those movies i just watch.
 

SimonCharlesHanna

New member
Jul 6, 2011
20
0
0
I hope I don't get burned for this but I really, really, reallly did not like Anchorman.

Because of this movie, I steer clear of all will farrell movies. I don't find him funny at all. The best one he has done is where he doesn't TRY to be funny.
 

floppylobster

New member
Oct 22, 2008
1,528
0
0
Ekonk said:
SirBryghtside said:
2001: A Space Odyssey. I watched it and was bored out of my skull, but I was genuinely interested in why people thought it was good. A couple of reviews later, and I find out the answer was because it's really good art, and anyone who says otherwise just doesn't 'get' it.

*sigh*
I think 2001 is amazing, although it's also really boring.

Same goes for Tarkovsky films, they're all masterpieces but so incredibly slow. But that's part of it, I guess. I can't imagine a fast-paced 2001: A Space Odyssey or Stalker.
But when you're really willing to contemplate the concepts explored in films like 2001, Stalker and Solaris, then those long 'boring' bits give you time to reflect and think about what you're being shown.

Though I totally get that people are bored by them. I was bored by 2001 when I was younger and, I hate to say it - didn't get it.
 

SecretAlienMan

New member
Mar 31, 2010
112
0
0
Watchmen. It loads you down with SOOOO much useless information and for a "superhero movie" it had very little superhero action moments
 

CupboardNinja

New member
Nov 30, 2010
81
0
0
The Dark Knight, definitely. Boring characters, the Joker's magical ability to place bombs wherever, and Batman's strict policy of not killing the Joker, even though it'd save thousands of lives; all these thing's just made it aterrible movie, especially considering I watched a master piece like Schindler's List five minutes before watching The Dark Knight.
 

DiabloBub666

New member
Aug 1, 2010
112
0
0
GONE WITH THE WIND. Without a doubt. I watched for an hour and gave up. It might be a great movie, but it just doesn't interest me. Just for ME, PERSONALLY.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
FalloutJack said:
The answer is 2012. But instead of ME explaining, I have a pinch-hitter for me. Take it away, Dara O'Briain!

That guy is hilarious. Here's to Brit comics!

Why does almost everyone seem to be picking critically acclaimed blockbusters from before they were born and only offering "it bored me" as an explanation? "It bored me" is not an assessment of a movie. "It bored me" with no characterization of how/why the film bored you makes it apparent that the something the movie offers has passed him/her by.
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
Oldboy.

To be honest, I really had no idea what to expect from it.

It really only had one redeeming factor, and that was the giant twist at the end. But really, the only thing I saw was a movie straining very hard to shock the audience.
 

MoosieMann

New member
Nov 18, 2009
70
0
0
elbrandino said:
Avatar is also up there. It's a gorgeous movie, but sometimes the plot just broke the fourth wall so hard. Examplse: unobtanium.
Oh I know this one! My dad works in the film business and 'unobtainium' is a term they use to represent a theoretical, indestructible material. IE: "If this was built out of unobtainium, we could rig it..." This was a reference directed to the people working in the film business (mostly grips) But anyways, i can agree (along with many here) that Avatar is overrated. Or, at least it was when i was coerced to see it. "You should see Avatar, that movie is awesome!" No. No it wasn't.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
Kysafen said:
For all the money it's made and re-kindling one of the worst gimmicks in cinema history [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-D_film], yes, I'd vote Avatar to be one of the most overrated films of all time.

SirBryghtside said:
2001: A Space Odyssey. I watched it and was bored out of my skull, but I was genuinely interested in why people thought it was good. A couple of reviews later, and I find out the answer was because it's really good art, and anyone who says otherwise just doesn't 'get' it.

*sigh*
Its messages and themes are of high importance to our race, but the way they're presented can and will turn people off. Either watch it again and dig deeper, or read the novel.
I get the obvious themes of technology and evolution, but what was it specifically supposed to be about? I recently got to see the sequel (John Lithgow was regrettably underused), which I found solidly "OK," but I'm not sure if the 2010 was Arthur C. Clarke-approved, or if it was written later and just threw out the allegory altogether in favor of a very literal deity story (like the godawful Cube sequels).
 

BanthaFodder

New member
Jan 17, 2011
774
0
0
for me it'd be Inception.
I thought it was OKAY, but I didn't care about the characters at ALL.
it felt like it was focusing on the gimmick more than being an actual movie, and everyone praised it as "deep" and such. it's not so much the movie that annoys me as it is the people who want to feel smart and defend it with their life. if you thought this movie was anything short of pure and utter gold, you "just didn't get it".
it's not that I didn't get it, I just didn't care. I saw the "twist" coming a mile away, and if you ask me, Toy Story 3 was far better and much more deep.
"what if life is a dream" is just something you think about when you're bored, leaving childhood behind is something everyone has to go through. I grew up with Toy Story and I'm going to be going to college in a few years. as such, the message of this movie really struck a chord with me.
Inception got an unenthusiastic "meh" out of me.
Toy Story 3 had me in tears by the end.

opps, just realised that this turned into a rant about how much I love Toy Story 3...
but yeah, Inception isn't as good as people say it is. good special effects, good score, pretty meh story and characters
 

remnant_phoenix

New member
Apr 4, 2011
1,439
0
0
Ti said:
Sidenote: Leona Lewis did the theme songs for both FFXIII and Avatar. Hm...
FFXIII was single greatest disappointment I've ever subjected myself too... If Leona Lewis is the problem, then my mission becomes clear:

Leona Lewis must be eliminated...

As for the OT, I'm gonna say "The Hangover." Moments that had my wife bursting into laughter just had me staring at the screen going, "Uh...is that supposed to be funny? Cause it's just random...and not 'random funny,' more like 'random stupid'."

Maybe it's because I cut my teeth on "ridiculous out-of-context random humor" with Aqua Teen Hunger Force years ago. The Hangover is a kiddie pool of "ridiculous out-of-context random humor" when compared to the likes of Aqua Teen's full-sized swimming pool.

Regardless, I think it's an overrated bucket of "meh."
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,485
0
0
funguy2121 said:
FalloutJack said:
The answer is 2012. But instead of ME explaining, I have a pinch-hitter for me. Take it away, Dara O'Briain!

That guy is hilarious. Here's to Brit comics!

Why does almost everyone seem to be picking critically acclaimed blockbusters from before they were born and only offering "it bored me" as an explanation? "It bored me" is not an assessment of a movie. "It bored me" with no characterization of how/why the film bored you makes it apparent that the something the movie offers has passed him/her by.
Oh, I can answer that. They're overrated people.

*Rimshot*
 

Kraj

New member
Jan 21, 2008
414
0
0
Hmm. I'd have to say Gone with the Wind.
Severely overrated. Either that or the Sound of Music. Both were... just terribly over-rated from both a cinematic perspective and an acting/plot perspective.
note: I'm not a KI major or anything so meh. imho.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
elbrandino said:
Inglorious Basterds. Tarantino has made nothing so far to show me he's as good as people say. The main thing I disliked about the movie was that it was advertised as a comedy and everyone said it was hilarious, and it was not funny at all. That and I don't like watching characters talk in languages I don't understand about a plot I stopped caring about 10 minutes in, all while reading subtitles.

Avatar is also up there. It's a gorgeous movie, but sometimes the plot just broke the fourth wall so hard. Examplse: unobtanium; predictable plot. I enjoyed watching it, but I don't think it's a phenomenon, and it's one of those movies I'll only watch once.
I loved Basterds, but it's not my favorite Tarantino film. The language/subs issue is a taste thing. It was well done. It's funny you should mention Basterds, because it relates to what you said about Avatar...

Warning: I'm going to be a huge nerd here and correct you. I hope this doesn't sound condescending. Fourth-wall breaking is a specific form of meta-fiction. It refers to, and only to, a character addressing the audience directly, as in the Bloodpool comics and the horrific (don't waste your time) Funny Games. Calling the sought-after material "unobtainium" isn't even really metafiction. Even if it weren't based on an engineering term, referring to something in this way isn't 4th wall breaking or metafiction. Metafiction is when a character addresses or acknowledges that he/she is a character. Stranger than Fiction is a fantastic example of this, as is Inglorious Basterds, specifically the very first scene, wherein the fantastic Christoph Waltz tells the farmer that he's exhausted all of his French and asks if he can finish the conversation in English. But Tarantino doesn't stop there - he didn't do it just for a dumb joke. He then uses that literary device to the story's end. The English is used to conceal from the Jews hiding under the floorboards that Col. Landa knows they are down there, and is about to kill them. It made the scene all the more gripping.

Two things struck me harder walking away from Inglorious Basterds than anything else: the first scene involving the title characters takes for ever but never ceases to be entertaining or stops serving the story, and proves that quite a bit of story can be pulled out of one scene, and the movie itself is a statement about the power of cinema. OK, and the standoff in the bar was one of the scariest things I've seen in a theater since the OD scene in Pulp Fiction.

Speaking of, go find a copy of that movie. Now. It'll change your view of Tarantino.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
FalloutJack said:
funguy2121 said:
FalloutJack said:
The answer is 2012. But instead of ME explaining, I have a pinch-hitter for me. Take it away, Dara O'Briain!

That guy is hilarious. Here's to Brit comics!

Why does almost everyone seem to be picking critically acclaimed blockbusters from before they were born and only offering "it bored me" as an explanation? "It bored me" is not an assessment of a movie. "It bored me" with no characterization of how/why the film bored you makes it apparent that the something the movie offers has passed him/her by.
Oh, I can answer that. They're overrated people.

*Rimshot*
Double tap to the splash (muted). Back to Metroid (Prime, you dolts. I do have taste).