Thats a weak excuse. I'm quite familiar with the fact that life isn't fair, and that good things happen to bad people, but I don't see anything redeemable about this portrayal, and that doesn't even seem like the point its trying to hammer home. And saying "Thats the point" can be plastered onto anything as justification, but that hardly makes it valid. That would be like if I said that the point of Indie movies was to wate two hours of your life. Also the whole thing about how the film somehow encourages the idea that 'murder is bad; seems to fall a little flat.PrinceOfShapeir said:Real life doesn't follow a three act structure. Real life doesn't play fair - good people suffer, bastards live like princes, and sometimes murderers escape.Mossberg Shotty said:Of all the movies you could choose to "defend" I don't understand why you would pick this one. I saw it a few years back and absolutely despised it. It's not a clever, realistic movie about the horrors of mass murder, its a celebration of it. The movie is completely glorifying the serial killer.
Maybe I could understand if he died at the end or something, but no. He lives, gets rich and posts a video on the internet explaining how awesome he is, and that only good things can come from murdering your fellow man. In fact, he's portrayed as something of a hero, the way he "opens everyones eyes to how corrupt society is."
Some of the scenes literally turned my fucking stomach, like when he mows down an innocent group of young women after showing them his face. But you only have good things to say about that, right?
The movie turned your stomach? Good! That's the whole point!
Sorry, but you don't get points for pointing out the well established/painfully obvious.