i thought the films were ok, just couildnt tell which robot was which when the fighting started
Thats where the Molds came from but it's not where the Transformers came from. The characters are more than just what toy molds they inhabited.DracoSuave said:Takara [wasn't merged with Tomy back then] had nothing to do with the American transformers series--they'd been selling Diaclone and Microman toys for almost a decade before the first of Transformers aired. Micromans were the mini-autobots that didn't scale with everything else, Diaclones were everything else.Winnosh said:You see that's the thing Transformers was always more than that. Yes Takara Tomy wanted to sell toys To do that they got Jim Shooter and Denis O Neil LEGENDS in the comics industry and heads of Marvel to create the characters and a comic book based around them. There are some amazing stories told with the characters throughout the years.
The cartoons are great but the comics will always be my first love in Transformers... Don't get me started on how I hated that the cartoon made the Dinobots stupid...
HASBRO decided to import the toys and molds and release some of the designs as a unified line called Transformers, with a cartoon and comic to market the toys with. The toys that had car and truck forms became the Autobots, and everything else became a decepticon.
It didn't take long to get popular, so Hasbro then made a deal to bring in the Scramble City lineup of toys, as well as more of the Microman selection and more Diaclones.
Eventually, however, they ran out of Micromans and Diaclones that they thought would sell, so new transformers engineering started happening at both Hasbro and Takara for this toyline, by now marketted as its own thing in both companies. This caused a different aesthetic, which required the removal of many Diaclone toys to prevent clashing--the new toys had no cockpits and were based on futuristic vehicles and fantastic things rather than being recognisable earth vehicles and objects. Thus the movie happened and killed everyone's childhood forever by murdering Optimus Prime.
And then they brought him back because people got angry.
And that is why Duke survived in the GI Joe movie no one watched.
Well if that's the case then I agree it was a pretty poor film for multiple reasons.Jigero said:The point of MDF is to defend legitimately good movies that got buried or have a bad wrap, which there are tons of.
All Jim is doing is just apologizing for legitimately bad movies in the vein attempt to attract attention.
I heavily recommend everyone go watch Best of the Worst over at redlettermedia (the same guys who did the plinkett reviews) They actually find legitimate diamonds in the rough instead of just apologizing for shit movies.
Hard to tell the characters apart in the action scenes?Tumedus said:The major premise of this defense is that the movie has good action. But it doesn't.
The action is so horribly shot. The transformers are hard to tell apart in robot mode, and the bulk of the action is shot in fast cut shaky cam with long stills close ups of humans reacting to visual nonsense elsewhere. I could go on about how offensive it is, how not funny it is, how bad the actors are, etc. but why bother. The one thing it had going for it, the one thing you try to use as its defense, it did horribly.
Yup. Apart from the two featured hero robots, Bumblebee and Optimus (I considered adding this to my post but didn't think I would need to justify it), the "characters" are basically just dark blobs of angled metal, especially the bad guys. I am not saying the movie is hard to follow, apart from the many continuity issues like Barricade showing up in the final battle, just that the action is poorly shot.arc1991 said:Hard to tell the characters apart in the action scenes?Tumedus said:The major premise of this defense is that the movie has good action. But it doesn't.
The action is so horribly shot. The transformers are hard to tell apart in robot mode, and the bulk of the action is shot in fast cut shaky cam with long stills close ups of humans reacting to visual nonsense elsewhere. I could go on about how offensive it is, how not funny it is, how bad the actors are, etc. but why bother. The one thing it had going for it, the one thing you try to use as its defense, it did horribly.
Come on now, the first cartoon was hilarious, all of the animation screw-ups, the colouring mistakes, the terrible plot contrivances, I see it as one of the greatest comedies of all time, you can't make something that funny intentionally, Transformers Prime is all around decent, Cybertron had good writing, the models were terrible, animation was bad, but the writing was really solid, and they've get some fun video games.the antithesis said:I only watched the first Transformers movie back when I still had HBO and HBO was running it ad nauseum. I didn't want to see the movie because I had been a fan back in the 80's when I was a kid, but now that I'm an adult I realize that Transformers is dog shit. Seriously. The toys were finicky and not much fun to play with except as a kind of Rubic's Cube were you need to figure out how to change them into a robot and back again. The were much too shaky and flimsy as action figures. The cartoon was a glorified toy commercial with the kind of bland characterization, inane plots and juvenile humor you'd expect in a children's show that does not hold up when watching it later in life. There's just nothing good about the franchise. So a movie version was not the sort of thing I wanted to see and neither should anybody else, honestly. It's like if cutting a flap pf skin off your penis was a common practice and no one question the stupidity of letting a sharp knife near your junk. Wake up, people!
I never understood when people said it was hard to tell them apart, yeah they're all angular, but they all have a completely different build, Megatron looks the most humanoid, Starscream has a huge upper body (he looks like a triangle) Blackout is tall with all of the blades, is it really that hard to say that a triangle doesn't look like a rectangle?arc1991 said:Hard to tell the characters apart in the action scenes?Tumedus said:The major premise of this defense is that the movie has good action. But it doesn't.
The action is so horribly shot. The transformers are hard to tell apart in robot mode, and the bulk of the action is shot in fast cut shaky cam with long stills close ups of humans reacting to visual nonsense elsewhere. I could go on about how offensive it is, how not funny it is, how bad the actors are, etc. but why bother. The one thing it had going for it, the one thing you try to use as its defense, it did horribly.
Bumblebee is yellow, Jazz is grey, Ironhide is black, Ratchet is green, Prime is red and blue...I'm sorry how is that hard to follow? really?
ROTF and DOTM have much better camera angles and transformation sequences, but still even in the first film its not hard to follow. Either i am really smart, most people on this thread are stupid, or most on this thread are G-whinners whose current purpose in the fandom is to deem all the films shit. probably the latter.
My point exactly.Warachia said:Fun fact, cutting skin off of somebodies dick IS a common practice.
Fun Fact, it's a common practice and started because of good reasons, like diseases and dirt going where they absolutely should not go.the antithesis said:My point exactly.Warachia said:Fun fact, cutting skin off of somebodies dick IS a common practice.
Especially the bad guys?Tumedus said:Yup. Apart from the two featured hero robots, Bumblebee and Optimus (I considered adding this to my post but didn't think I would need to justify it), the "characters" are basically just dark blobs of angled metal, especially the bad guys. I am not saying the movie is hard to follow, apart from the many continuity issues like Barricade showing up in the final battle, just that the action is poorly shot.arc1991 said:Hard to tell the characters apart in the action scenes?Tumedus said:The major premise of this defense is that the movie has good action. But it doesn't.
The action is so horribly shot. The transformers are hard to tell apart in robot mode, and the bulk of the action is shot in fast cut shaky cam with long stills close ups of humans reacting to visual nonsense elsewhere. I could go on about how offensive it is, how not funny it is, how bad the actors are, etc. but why bother. The one thing it had going for it, the one thing you try to use as its defense, it did horribly.
I recall when I saw the movie, many people were confused as which robots were fighting which battles.
First I want to make a clarification. The issue with them being identifiable isn't about being able to tell who was in what part of the movie or how the plot advanced. Not that that was overly important in a movie like this, anyway. The issue I am talking about is how it impacts the action scenes specifically, as their indistinguishable characteristics contribute to making the fights incoherent.arc1991 said:Especially the bad guys?Tumedus said:Yup. Apart from the two featured hero robots, Bumblebee and Optimus (I considered adding this to my post but didn't think I would need to justify it), the "characters" are basically just dark blobs of angled metal, especially the bad guys. I am not saying the movie is hard to follow, apart from the many continuity issues like Barricade showing up in the final battle, just that the action is poorly shot.arc1991 said:Hard to tell the characters apart in the action scenes?Tumedus said:The major premise of this defense is that the movie has good action. But it doesn't.
The action is so horribly shot. The transformers are hard to tell apart in robot mode, and the bulk of the action is shot in fast cut shaky cam with long stills close ups of humans reacting to visual nonsense elsewhere. I could go on about how offensive it is, how not funny it is, how bad the actors are, etc. but why bother. The one thing it had going for it, the one thing you try to use as its defense, it did horribly.
I recall when I saw the movie, many people were confused as which robots were fighting which battles.
So you can't tell the difference between this
![]()
And this
![]()
And this?
![]()
I'm not denying that there are story and continuity issues (Barricades disappearance, Starscream being absent when Megs got killed etc) But telling the difference between the characters is easy! It's a complaint I just cant get my head around, half the time the Autobots shout out who is coming (Ironhide shouting "It's Starscream!" and Optimus saying "Megatron"!) Hell there is a frigging scene where the cons introduce themselves! (Admittedly there was a naming error but still!) And the Autobots introduce themselves at least half hour into the film! Seriously it isn't hard! -.-