I'm not sure if I'd call the guy who did "Rubber" a visionary director.
For those of you who are not familiar with "Rubber" it is by definition a movie without a point or plot. You have a tire (yes a tire) with psychic powers pretty much randomly rolling around killing stuff, while an audience of people out in the desert there for the show wait for something and pretty much self destruct.
I really do "get" Rubber (if you've seen it), but that doesn't make it good or visionary. While this movie he's doing could very well be funny or entertaining, if he's selling it based on his previous work, I really suggest avoiding it. "Rubber" seemed like it could be cool/funny too... it really, really, wasn't. The term "trying too hard" comes to mind, which seems like it happens a lot with attempts to make deliberatly edgy, low-budget,"art films". Minimalist surrealism is took often used as an excuse for not even trying.
