I went through more pages of this thread than can be healthy, and while I don't have much of an opinion about Bob's departure and whether or not it was deserved I am baffled by how so many people are taking the time to tell others that they're glad to see him gone because (they disagreed with his movie opinions/they disagreed with his political views/they didn't watch his videos at all).
On the first or second page someone uses a restaurant as an analogy; 'If I'm eating at a restaurant I don't want to hear noxious political opinions.' And I'm thinking 'Dude, just leave the restaurant!'
All of these 'I'm glad he's gone' comments are about videos and columns you don't have to watch/read in the first place! Why does it matter if he is on this site or somewhere else when you have no obligation to devote focus to his stuff? All this means is you won't be reminded of his existence when you visit the site's main page, and if you are so relieved not to have that happen anymore, you have bigger issues than the specific focus of your ire.
On the first or second page someone uses a restaurant as an analogy; 'If I'm eating at a restaurant I don't want to hear noxious political opinions.' And I'm thinking 'Dude, just leave the restaurant!'
All of these 'I'm glad he's gone' comments are about videos and columns you don't have to watch/read in the first place! Why does it matter if he is on this site or somewhere else when you have no obligation to devote focus to his stuff? All this means is you won't be reminded of his existence when you visit the site's main page, and if you are so relieved not to have that happen anymore, you have bigger issues than the specific focus of your ire.