Owyn_Merrilin said:
On topic: I really can't stand any punk-derived genre of music, and that goes doubly for screamo and metal core. The reason I can't stand punk is that it was a rebellion against the need for professional musicians to be technically skilled with their instruments. It's part of the modern culture of laziness, and a part that, as a musician, I really can't stand. As for why screamo and the various other hardcore punk genres bother me, it's because they've been frequently confused for metal in recent years, giving music that actually requires a level of virtuosity unseen outside of jazz these days a bad name as a genre for lazy people to go "chugga chugga chugga COOKIE COOKIE COOKIE chugga chugga chugga..."
Accusing punk of lacking virtuosity is missing the point somewhat. While virtuosity is prized by metal and jazz, punk promoted other traits instead. Pop songwriting (Buzzcocks, the Ramones), lyrical ability (Patti Smith, Nick Cave), innovation (Television, Talking Heads, Suicide, the Slits), "realness", energy, DIY spirit (Minor Threat/Fugazi). Technical skill is neither necessary nor sufficient for good music.
Anyway, the initial punk wave gave way to derivative genres that did require skill, even though it didn't manifest itself in guitar solos (appart from Television: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlbunmCbTBA). Sonic Youths alternative tunings and unusual time signatures, the Pop Group's free jazz channeling punk, PiL's krautrock influenced songs, My Bloody Valentine's intensely polished shoegaze. Heck, even metal bands like Motorhead were partly influenced by the punk movement.