MW2: how did the [spoilers] blow up?

kommunizt kat

New member
Jul 8, 2009
351
0
0
(dont know how to hide spoilers) in MW2 the ISS blows up so how is this possible since the shock wave from the blast doesnt travel through anything? Let the theories begin
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Well since you can't hide spoilers in a title I guess it wouldn't matter but for future reference (spoiler)(/spoiler) changing the ( to [

And I think

a wizard did it
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
I also noticed the ridiculousness of this. I'm no astrophysicist but I believe that common sense would tell you that shockwaves can't travel through somewhere where there isn't air. Also, I figure that in order for the shockwave to have reached a space station it also would have effected the rest of the planet, or at least half of it.

I would be more disappointed with the lack of realism in that sequence if not for the nonsensical absurdities I had already witnessed in Modern Warfare 2's story, and the ones I would continue to see.

Infinity Ward, I am disappoint.
 

Chester41585

New member
Mar 22, 2009
593
0
0
In physics, it doesn't happen. In Hollywood, not only is there sound in space, but pressure waves can travel through vacuum.

This game went for the Hollywood style and passed with flying colors. It's everything you've seen from any recent J.J. Abrams, Michael Bay, or Steven Spielberg movie. High-speed chases, impossible action bits, explosions, explosions, Michael BAY-SPLOSIONS!
 

Scumpernickle

New member
Sep 16, 2009
456
0
0
The blast was big enough to go all the way into space maybe?

And the rest of the planet didn't suffer horrible shockwave rape because of dark magics?

I'm not sure anymore...
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
Heh, people assume because space is a vacuum that's the only principle of physics you have to obey.
Never mind all the matter and gas introduced into the vacuum of space by a fucking nuclear warhead exploding. That's right people, when something explodes you get a lot of pressurised gas expanding very rapidly. If you don't think gas can carry a shockwave, I can see how you'd nitpick this point.

But please, feel free to ignore this post if you want to ***** about a very good game because it's trendy to do so. While you're at it, complain about why lasers make noise during space battle sequences in Star Wars.
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
Scumpernickle said:
The blast was big enough to go all the way into space maybe?

And the rest of the planet didn't suffer horrible shockwave rape because of dark magics?

I'm not sure anymore...
Um. The explosion happened in space. It didn't need to go anywhere.
 

Scumpernickle

New member
Sep 16, 2009
456
0
0
Kermi said:
Scumpernickle said:
The blast was big enough to go all the way into space maybe?

And the rest of the planet didn't suffer horrible shockwave rape because of dark magics?

I'm not sure anymore...
Um. The explosion happened in space. It didn't need to go anywhere.
Don't have the game so I'm trying to get by on some bits of info...

I still blame the dark magics.
 

Kollega

New member
Jun 5, 2009
5,161
0
0
Just how close the nuke was to ISS? Expanding cloud of hot gas could have did it. Or it was a wisard.
 

Omikron009

New member
May 22, 2009
3,817
0
0
Spoilers in the thread title=bad. Also I was wondering the exact same thing. I'm not sure if a shockwave like that can actually travel through space. I don't think so.
 

Wakefield

New member
Aug 3, 2009
827
0
0
That scene bugged me so much. I think it was one of the only moments in COD I actually stopped and went. That's completely ridiculous. (Don't misunderstand the rest of the plot was ridiculous but that just took the cake for me)
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
I thought it was the EMP, which was the point of launching the nuke into space in the first place.
ToxinArrow said:
The lack of coherent story did it.
Okay, this annoys me. No, the story is not hand fed to you the same way it was in MW1. Yes, it holds up to inspection if you just take the time to analyze it. Just tell me what you found incoherent and I'll explain.
 

ninja555

New member
Mar 21, 2009
780
0
0
The game turned into a Hollywood actionfilm that destroy the very physics of time and space, caused sound and sockwaves to travel through a vacuum.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
ninja555 said:
The game turned into a Hollywood actionfilm that destroy the very physics of time and space, caused sound and sockwaves to travel through a vacuum.
Not to beat a dead horse but...
Kermi said:
Heh, people assume because space is a vacuum that's the only principle of physics you have to obey.
Never mind all the matter and gas introduced into the vacuum of space by a fucking nuclear warhead exploding. That's right people, when something explodes you get a lot of pressurised gas expanding very rapidly. If you don't think gas can carry a shockwave, I can see how you'd nitpick this point.

But please, feel free to ignore this post if you want to ***** about a very good game because it's trendy to do so. While you're at it, complain about why lasers make noise during space battle sequences in Star Wars.
 

Kubanator

New member
Dec 7, 2008
261
0
0
Kermi said:
Heh, people assume because space is a vacuum that's the only principle of physics you have to obey.
Never mind all the matter and gas introduced into the vacuum of space by a fucking nuclear warhead exploding. That's right people, when something explodes you get a lot of pressurised gas expanding very rapidly. If you don't think gas can carry a shockwave, I can see how you'd nitpick this point.

But please, feel free to ignore this post if you want to ***** about a very good game because it's trendy to do so. While you're at it, complain about why lasers make noise during space battle sequences in Star Wars.
The nuke exploded a good 1000-5000km away. The mass launched by the nuke that would hit such a small target as the ISS would be minimal. But, feel free to try being self righteous and correct people. While you're at it, why don't you complain about the lack of coherent story.
 

Bretty

New member
Jul 15, 2008
864
0
0
Yeah, last time I checked there is not only no mass out there but there is no air?

The only thing the bomb would release is energy.... Now that energy has to go somewhere. It is plausible, I suppose.
 

ToxinArrow

New member
Jun 13, 2009
246
0
0
orannis62 said:
I thought it was the EMP, which was the point of launching the nuke into space in the first place.
ToxinArrow said:
The lack of coherent story did it.
Okay, this annoys me. No, the story is not hand fed to you the same way it was in MW1. Yes, it holds up to inspection if you just take the time to analyze it. Just tell me what you found incoherent and I'll explain.
Well since you asked....

Who is the man in the saferoom? Why does Price nuke America? How does Price know how to set the timer/range for a nuclear missile? Why does Shepard betray 141? There are a few others, but I can't think of them.
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
Kubanator said:
The nuke exploded a good 1000-5000km away. The mass launched by the nuke would be minimal. But, feel free to try being self righteous and correct people. While you're at it, why don't you complain about the lack of coherent story.
1,000-5,000km? Ha ha ha, oh wow.
The ISS is never more than 350km above the earth, and that's it's apogee. Keep in mind the height of earth's atmosphere is about 80km, and you've got a maximum of 270km - now keep in mind space is a vacuum (which all detractors are so fond of reminding us), which means travelling particles are not limited by atmospheric pressure and air viscosity like they would be in an explosion that happens within the earth's atmosphere.

Science!