I won't be picking this one up. I did enjoy MW2 (it was a bit unbalanced for my taste, but it at least tried to be original, and it did change quite a bit), but MW3 just seems like a map-pack for MW2 with no large maps.
1. The maps suck. The Spawns suck. It's all just random chaos.Capitano Segnaposto said:5.) Please tell me what they didn't do correct? The Layout seems good, the weapons and levels are fun as ever and the game is, to me a worthy sequel.F4LL3N said:Snip
this is off topic..but is your avatar what i think it is?Tin Man said:snip
YESTin Man said:Lol, guy from Jeepers Creepers, The Creeper.gmaverick019 said:this is off topic..but is your avatar what i think it is?Tin Man said:snip
if it is, i might just have to hunt you down, that thing used to be the grim reaper of my night mares.
OT: meh i'm not wasting another 60 bucks on it, when i can just play cod 4 for the same stuff, but more balanced and less raging.
i watched my bro play it and he let me have a couple turns, but like i said, it doesn't seem like anything besides bad balancing of maps/weapons on the map, so i'll definitely be giving this one a pass.
Sucks to be you if that shits in your head though man, that film freaked me out a bit!
Agreed. I play multiplayer just cause litrally all my freinds play cod multiplayer but the single player is Wow its so blooming shiney. If you want to completely tear the game to pieces play it all not just the online aspects like I say the story mode looks georgues . Like I say to a lot of ppl online if you don't like it don't play itSweetLiquidSnake said:Try this: Dont play online.
Play the story, which is why I loved MW2, get some achievements/trohpies, and spare yourself the headache of competing against that asshole who's been playing non-stop since midnight and is already level 50. I dont see the fascination of multiplayer....
1. It's said that the people demanded a war, so he would give in to such pressure to stay ontop of things rather than let someone else (Makarov) take over.Ixal said:1. That doesn't cut it. Someone who launches WW3 won't simply back off a few days later and argue against his ministers that peace is a better way. You don't flipflop on such a decision.Burn2Feel said:SnipIxal said:SnipSweetLiquidSnake said:Snip
2. Lol, no. I know Americans are scared shitless about illegal immigration, but getting hundreds of armed man and WMDs into several European cities undetected is laughable as their borders are much better controlled than the US/Mexican border because they are smaller.
3. Unlikely. PMCs are legit businesses and thus people would notice when they are hired en mass by a know terrorist. Also, not many legal businesses would have much interest in working with terrorists in the first place.
4. Thats not how wars work. There are those annoying things like supply lines which means that the frontline can't be in Paris and Berlin in the same time. The forces in Paris would be completely cut off from any supply. And don't get me started about this laughable US invasion.
5. Right, people are smuggling a Hind into Somalia within a few days how? By freighter? Or getting through numerous more stable countries illegally with an attack helicopter which magically doesn't have to refuel? But I forget, Nicolay nearly has as many resources available as Marakov, meaning he probably has the 2nd largest army in the world. And the US getting helicopters into Siberia? Where do they refuel?
6. Yuri scared? This man takes on a whole army nearly alone to kill Marakov. Why would he be scared to tell the Russians that Marakov (known, internationally hunter terrorist btw.)was involved (he could just claim that he recognized him from pictures. But as the Russians didn't even bother to look at camera footage from the massacre to recognize Marakon and instead relied on CSI Moscow to determine that the one body found was American that might not have been much use). And while Marakov has a infinite, all powerful army he has hardly any political power.
7. A rather weak excuse. When the president who knows the nuclear launch codes goes missing, changing the codes would be standard procedure.
8. All other forces pretty much suck and fail unless the Americans show up. Why couldn't the French have defended Paris? And when you remember, the French got shot up till the Americans showed up and the Germans were simply obliterated. And the SAS also failed to prevent the attack. The only nation who has any success in this game are the Americans.
Also two new things:
- Why can Russian missiles be instantly reprogrammed to fire at their own troops? (And how can medium range missiles hit targets 100 meters next to their launch point? They are not designed for that.)
- Why does Price tell Yuri to operate the Drone because the Program is in Russian? This guy boarded a Russian submarine and reprogrammed a nuclear missile to airburst over Washington and he can't speak Russian? (Why didn't he need the launch codes for that btw?)
Spec Ops survival was really good I thought, but Spec Ops missions were just the same as MW2's, which I really didn't like.Raiyan 1.0 said:Been playing a bit of MW3 in my friend's house, and while the SP is shit and according to him the MP isn't that great either, Specs Ops was surprisingly good.